Indexed in Journament

Journal of trace elements in medicine and biology : organ of the Society for Minerals and Trace Elements (GMS)

ISSN 1878-3252· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
41.0 / 100
Journament Score
Below Average
Ranked #7,669 of 33,995 indexed journals
16 Articles
Accessibility 35
Engagement 31
The Journament Score combines content quality, publication ethics and transparency, editorial standards, publication regularity, accessibility and reader engagement into a single 0–100 figure. It is recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed.

About This Journal

Short Name J Trace Elem Med Biol
Abbreviated Name j trace elem med biol
ISSN 1878-3252
URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/journal/journal-of-trace-elements-in-medicine-and-biology

Publications Per Year

Articles (16)

2019
Protective effects of grape seed proanthocyanidins against iron overload-induced renal oxidative damage in rats.
, pp. 126407
440 views DOI Abstract
2019
Influence of the selenium level on overall survival in lung cancer.
Vol. 56 , pp. 46-51
426 views DOI Abstract
2019
Plasma selenium levels and risk of new-onset diabetes in hypertensive adults.
Vol. 56 , pp. 6-12
411 views DOI Abstract
2019
Biodistribution and toxickinetic variances of chemical and green Copper oxide nanoparticles in vitro and in vivo.
Vol. 55 , pp. 154-169
385 views DOI Abstract
2019
Assessing the dietary intake of calcium, magnesium, iron, zinc and copper in institutionalised children and adolescents from Guatemala. Contribution of nutritional supplements.
Vol. 53 , pp. 91-97
371 views DOI Abstract
2020
Chemical elements and preeclampsia - An overview of current problems, challenges and significance of recent research.
Vol. 59 , pp. 126468
345 views DOI Abstract
2021
Association of selenium, zinc and copper concentrations during pregnancy with birth weight: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Vol. 69 , pp. 126903
339 views DOI Abstract
2019
Antioxidant and anti-gout effects of orally administered zinc oxide nanoparticles in gouty mice.
Vol. 56 , pp. 169-177
327 views DOI Abstract
2015
ethical stakeholder engagement
Vol. 9 , No. 1 , pp. -
322 views Abstract
2019
Selenium and iodine in diabetes mellitus with a focus on the interplay and speciation of the elements.
Vol. 56 , pp. 69-80
321 views DOI Abstract
2021
Association of selenium, zinc and copper concentrations during pregnancy with birth weight: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Vol. 69 , pp. 126903
339 views DOI Abstract
2020
Chemical elements and preeclampsia - An overview of current problems, challenges and significance of recent research.
Vol. 59 , pp. 126468
345 views DOI Abstract
2019
Biodistribution and toxickinetic variances of chemical and green Copper oxide nanoparticles in vitro and in vivo.
Vol. 55 , pp. 154-169
385 views DOI Abstract
2019
Protective effects of grape seed proanthocyanidins against iron overload-induced renal oxidative damage in rats.
, pp. 126407
440 views DOI Abstract
2019
Antioxidant and anti-gout effects of orally administered zinc oxide nanoparticles in gouty mice.
Vol. 56 , pp. 169-177
327 views DOI Abstract
2019
Selenium and iodine in diabetes mellitus with a focus on the interplay and speciation of the elements.
Vol. 56 , pp. 69-80
321 views DOI Abstract
2019
Assessing the dietary intake of calcium, magnesium, iron, zinc and copper in institutionalised children and adolescents from Guatemala. Contribution of nutritional supplements.
Vol. 53 , pp. 91-97
371 views DOI Abstract
2019
Influence of the selenium level on overall survival in lung cancer.
Vol. 56 , pp. 46-51
426 views DOI Abstract
2019
Plasma selenium levels and risk of new-onset diabetes in hypertensive adults.
Vol. 56 , pp. 6-12
411 views DOI Abstract
2018
a delphi study to identify standards for internal communication
Vol. 11 , No. 3 , pp. -
232 views Abstract
Journament Score
41.0/100 · Below Average
Ranked #7,669 of 33,995

Overall Quality Score

41.0/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

31.3/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

35.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.