a delphi study to identify standards for internal communication
Clicks: 239
ID: 219361
2018
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Steady Performance
30.0
/100
239 views
33 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
SteadyRanked #11 of 16 articles by views in Journal of trace elements in medicine and biology : organ of the Society for Minerals and Trace Elements (GMS)
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
In recent years, significant advancement has been made in establishing standards for measuring
external public relations efforts. Little has been done, however, to standardize measurement for
those responsible for internal communication. Employees are critical to the success of any
organization, and the effectiveness of communication with them is of paramount importance.
Seeking to rectify this gap, the Institute for Public Relations and the Commission on Research,
Measurement, and Evaluation created an international 11-member task force comprising
academics and practitioners in 2015 to develop internal communication measurement standards.
The task force identified and tentatively defined possible standards for internal communication.
The researchers of this study extended the global task force’s initial work by conducting a Delphi
study in 2016 with a purposive sample of 22 internal communication thought leaders to
determine if a wider audience of internal communication practitioners agreed with the task
force’s recommended standards and definitions. This research describes the findings of the
Delphi study and introduces and defines measurement standards that internal communication
practitioners can use to create more effective communication plans and measure the value
communication bring to their organizations. The proposed standards also supersede the current
"engagement" catchall goal that tends to be amorphous and difficult to address. In the future, the
researchers plan to test the reliability and validity of the internal communication standards
developed in this study, so that practitioners can measure in a consistent and comparable
manner—the ultimate goal of standardization.
| Reference Key |
oneil2018publica
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | ;Julie O’Neil;Michele Ewing;Stacey Smith;Sean Williams |
| Journal | Journal of trace elements in medicine and biology : organ of the Society for Minerals and Trace Elements (GMS) |
| Year | 2018 |
| DOI |
DOI not found
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.