Indexed in Journament

annals of intensive care

ISSN 2110-5820· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
39.4/100
Journament Score
#9,287
Journament Rank
131
Articles Indexed

About This Journal

Short Name annals of intensive care
Abbreviated Name annals of intensive care
ISSN 2110-5820
URL https://annalsofintensivecare.springeropen.com

Indexings

scopus doaj ulakbim sci

Tools & Certificate of Indexing

Certificate of Indexing
Quality Badge Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's verified indexing scores on your website with our self-contained widget.

One-Line JavaScript Embed:
Advantages: Single-line script, seamless DOM integration, clickable badges linking to full journal profile.
Standard iFrame Embed Code:
Widget Preview:

Publications Per Year

Articles (131)

2019
Photoplethysmographic determination of the respiratory rate in acutely ill patients: validation of a new algorithm and implementation into a biomedical device
Vol. 9 , No. 1 , pp. 1-10
430 views Abstract
2021
Performance of the ROX index to predict intubation in immunocompromised patients receiving high-flow nasal cannula for acute respiratory failure - Annals of Intensive Care
Vol. 11 , No. 1 , pp. 1-9
400 views DOI Abstract
2016
endoscopic diagnosis and differentiation of inflammatory bowel disease
Vol. 49 , No. 4 , pp. 370-375
365 views DOI Abstract
2021
An international survey on aminoglycoside practices in critically ill patients: the AMINO III study
Vol. 11 , No. 1 , pp. -
346 views Abstract
2021
Comparison between regional citrate anticoagulation and heparin for intermittent hemodialysis in ICU patients: a propensity score-matched cohort study - Annals of Intensive Care
Vol. 11 , No. 1 , pp. 1-9
342 views DOI Abstract
2021
Predictors of fluid responsiveness in critically ill patients mechanically ventilated at low tidal volumes: systematic review and meta-analysis
Vol. 11 , pp. -
324 views DOI Abstract
2021
Insulin sensitivity in critically ill patients: are women more insulin resistant?
Vol. 11 , pp. -
81 views DOI Abstract
2021
Regional citrate anticoagulation for intermittent hemodialysis in the intensive care: what is the optimal setup?
Vol. 11 , pp. -
95 views DOI
2021
Increased susceptibility to intensive care unit-acquired pneumonia in severe COVID-19 patients: a multicentre retrospective cohort study
Vol. 11 , pp. -
81 views DOI Abstract
2021
Predictors of fluid responsiveness in critically ill patients mechanically ventilated at low tidal volumes: systematic review and meta-analysis
Vol. 11 , pp. -
324 views DOI Abstract
2021
Comparison between regional citrate anticoagulation and heparin for intermittent hemodialysis in ICU patients: a propensity score-matched cohort study - Annals of Intensive Care
Vol. 11 , No. 1 , pp. 1-9
342 views DOI Abstract
2021
Elevated plasma IL-6 and CRP levels are associated with adverse clinical outcomes and death in critically ill SARS-CoV-2 patients: inflammatory response of SARS-CoV-2 patients
Vol. 11 , pp. -
111 views DOI Abstract
2021
Dobutamine-sparing versus dobutamine-to-all strategy in cardiac surgery: a randomized noninferiority trial
Vol. 11 , pp. -
152 views DOI Abstract
2021
Malignant pertussis in infants: factors associated with mortality in a multicenter cohort study
Vol. 11 , pp. -
5 views DOI Abstract
2021
Levosimendan use in patients with acute heart failure and reduced ejection fraction with or without severe renal dysfunction in critical cardiac care units: a multi-institution database study - Annals of Intensive Care
Vol. 11 , No. 1 , pp. 1-11
220 views DOI Abstract
2021
Sympathetic stimulation increases serum lactate concentrations in patients admitted with sepsis: implications for resuscitation strategies
Vol. 11 , pp. -
107 views DOI Abstract
39
Overall
Poor
31
35
30
40
38
50
0
0
0
0
0

Overall Quality Score

39.4/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.5/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

37.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.