annales de dermatologie et de venereologie | Journament

Journal Ranking

#516 / 33,971
📊 Below Average
Overall Score
43.1/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
30
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
35
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 2 weeks ago

annales de dermatologie et de venereologie

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
ncbi
Short Name ann dermatol venereol
Abbreviated Name ann dermatol venereol
ISSN 0151-9638
Aim and Scope
URL https://www.journals.elsevier.com/annales-de-dermatologie-et-de-venereologie
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (12 total)

2020
[Pediatric cutaneous leishmaniasis in Morocco: Clinical and epidemiological features].
Baghad, B;Riyad, M;Razanapinaritra, R;Maksouri, H;Ben Errais, H;Chiheb, S;
Vol. 147 , No. 2 , pp. 106-112
323 views DOI Abstract
2010
um modelo de cores na usabilidade das interfaces computacionais para os deficientes de baixa visão
;Cínthia Costa Kulpa;Fábio Gonçalves Teixeira;Régio Pierre da Silva
Vol. 1 , No. 01 , pp. 66-78
259 views DOI Abstract
2010
uma contribuição ao ecodesign: metodologia para avaliação e seleção de células de baterias de nimh, visando o seu reuso
;Sandra Souza dos Santos;Wilson S Kindlein Jr;Eduardo Luís Schneider;Célia de Fraga Malfatti
Vol. 1 , No. 01 , pp. 51-59
255 views DOI Abstract
2017
[Uncombable hair syndrome: Association of wrongdoers].
Dereure, O;
Vol. 144 , No. 3 , pp. 241-242
229 views DOI
2016
método para obtenção de medidas antropométricas utilizando um digitalizador 3d de baixo custo
;Clariana Fischer Bendler;Fábio Gonçalves Teixeira
Vol. 6 , No. 11 , pp. -
224 views Abstract
2013
identificação e sistematização de diretrizes para o design de embalagens sustentáveis
;Priscila Zavadil;Regio Pierre Silva
Vol. 3 , No. 05 , pp. -
221 views Abstract
2010
a biomimética como método criativo para o projeto de produto
;Flora Bittencourt Detanico;Fábio Gonçalves Teixeira;Tânia Luísa Koltermann da Silva
Vol. 1 , No. 02 , pp. 101-113
220 views DOI Abstract
2010
reaproveitamento de resíduos de mdf da indústria moveleira
;Aline Freitas da Silva;Carolina Finamore de Figueiredo
Vol. 1 , No. 02 , pp. 77-87
211 views DOI Abstract
2016
avaliação de soluções geradas a partir de métodos de design voltados para a inovação
;Melissa Pozatti;Maurício Moreira e Silva Bernardes;Júlio Carlos de Souza Van der Linden
Vol. 6 , No. 12 , pp. -
207 views Abstract
[Notions of race: from diagnosis to therapy].
Bonniol, J-L;
Vol. 141 , No. 8-9 , pp. 553-9
200 views DOI
View All 12 Articles
43
Overall
Below Average
30
35
30
40
35
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

43.1/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.4/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

34.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.