Indexed in Journament

Ciencia & saude coletiva

ISSN 1678-4561· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
35.3 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #12,699 of 29,324 scored journals (33,995 indexed)
37 Articles
Scores higher than 56.6% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name Cien Saude Colet
Abbreviated Name cien saude colet
ISSN 1678-4561

Quality Profile

6 of 12 dimensions measured
Engagement 31.0
Timeliness 20.0
Diversity 5.6
Innovation 70.0
Community Impact 12.9
Content Distribution 71.9
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

6 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left out entirely rather than plotted as zero, and with 6 dimensions measured there is not enough of a profile to draw as a shape.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for Ciencia & saude coletiva
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 31.0 30.4
Accessibility 19.1
Timeliness 20.0 9.2
Diversity 5.6 25.8
Innovation 70.0 27.4
Community Impact 12.9 7.8
Content Distribution 71.9 88.6
Content Quality 55.5
Ethics & Transparency 40.2
Editorial Standards 33.4
Publication Regularity 53.2
Geographic Reach 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (37)

2010
Uso de substâncias psicoativas entre estudantes de odontologia da Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo Psychoactive substance use among Espírito Santo Federal University odontology students
Vol. 15 , No. 3 , pp. 655-662
559 views Abstract
2019
Two examples of narrative constructs in the sociology of health.
Vol. 24 , No. 9 , pp. 3463-3468
458 views DOI Abstract
2019
Economic crises, child mortality and the protective role of public health expenditure.
Vol. 24 , No. 12 , pp. 4395-4404
453 views DOI Abstract
2019
Towards post-colonial capacity-building methodologies - some remarks on the experiences of health researchers from Mozambique and Angola.
Vol. 24 , No. 5 , pp. 1617-1626
438 views DOI Abstract
2016
Family functioning and health issues associated with codependency in families of drug users
Vol. 21 , No. 1 , pp. 101-107
434 views Abstract
2010
A saúde na escola: um breve resgate histórico Health at school: a brief history
Vol. 15 , No. 2 , pp. 397-402
433 views Abstract
2019
The pharmacist in the Brazilian Primary Health Care: insertion under construction.
Vol. 24 , No. 10 , pp. 3717-3726
429 views DOI Abstract
2020
Evaluation of the quality of prenatal care based on the recommendations Prenatal and Birth Humanization Program.
Vol. 25 , No. 3 , pp. 793-804
414 views DOI Abstract
2013
Gestão de recursos financeiros da educação permanente em saúde: desafio das comissões de integração ensino-serviço Management of financial resources of permament education in health: challenge of the in-service learning integration committees
Vol. 18 , No. 6 , pp. 1683-1693
401 views Abstract
2019
How do we live with chronic disease? A rights-based approach promoting the wellbeing of children with chronic disease.
Vol. 24 , No. 10 , pp. 3663-3672
397 views DOI Abstract
2024
When disability and homoparenting meet: the adoption of children with disability by same sex couples.
Vol. 29 , No. 4 , pp. e19772023
117 views DOI Abstract
2020
Learning the clinic of social suffering: narratives of Internship in Primary Health Care.
Vol. 25 , No. 4 , pp. 1251-1260
347 views DOI Abstract
2020
Evaluation of the quality of prenatal care based on the recommendations Prenatal and Birth Humanization Program.
Vol. 25 , No. 3 , pp. 793-804
414 views DOI Abstract
2020
Nursing technician training: qualification profile.
Vol. 25 , No. 1 , pp. 67-78
276 views DOI Abstract
2020
Job satisfaction of nursing staff in the public health network in a Brazilian capital city.
Vol. 25 , No. 1 , pp. 169-180
182 views DOI Abstract
2019
Economic crises, child mortality and the protective role of public health expenditure.
Vol. 24 , No. 12 , pp. 4395-4404
453 views DOI Abstract
2019
The pharmacist in the Brazilian Primary Health Care: insertion under construction.
Vol. 24 , No. 10 , pp. 3717-3726
429 views DOI Abstract
2019
Rare diseases and the associative dialogue: resignifications for moral experiences.
Vol. 24 , No. 10 , pp. 3673-3682
302 views DOI Abstract
2019
[Social identity of people with rare conditions and the lack of diagnosis: contributions based on Hall, Honneth and Jutel].
Vol. 24 , No. 10 , pp. 3701-3708
302 views DOI Abstract
2019
Two examples of narrative constructs in the sociology of health.
Vol. 24 , No. 9 , pp. 3463-3468
458 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
35.3/100 · Poor
Ranked #12,699 of 29,324 scored
(33,995 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

35.3/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

31.0/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

5.6/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

12.9/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

20.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

71.9/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.