artificial cells, nanomedicine, and biotechnology | Journament

Journal Ranking

#3313 / 33,982
📊 Below Average
Overall Score
41.7/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
38
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 12 hours ago

artificial cells, nanomedicine, and biotechnology

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Certificate of Indexing
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
ncbi
Short Name artif cells nanomed biotechnol
Abbreviated Name artificial cells, nanomedicine, and biotechnology
ISSN 2169-141X
Aim and Scope
URL https://www.tandfonline.com/toc/ianb20/current
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (50 total)

2018
Preliminary investigation of novel tetra-tailed macrocycle amphiphile based nano-vesicles for amphotericin B improved oral pharmacokinetics.
Ali, Imdad;Rehman, Jawad Ur;Ullah, Shafi;Imran, Muhammad;Javed, Ibrahim;El-Haj, Babiker M;Saad Ali, Heyam;Arfan, Muhammad;Shah, Muhammad Raza;
Vol. 46 , No. sup3 , pp. S1204-S1214
514 views DOI Abstract
2013
survey of stress, anxiety, depression and self-concept of students of fasa university of medical sciences, 2010
;Majid Najafi Kalyani ;Elaheh Pourjam ;Nahid Jamshidi ;Shahnaz Karimi ;Vahid Najafi Kalyani
Vol. 3 , No. 3 , pp. 235-240
508 views Abstract
2020
Design and construction of a magnetic targeting pro-coagulant protein for embolic therapy of solid tumors.
Zou, Mingyuan;Xu, Peilan;Wang, Li;Wang, Lanlan;Li, Tingting;Liu, Cong;Shi, Lei;Xie, Jun;Li, Wanyun;Wang, Shengyu;Wu, Guoqiu;Luo, Fanghong;Wu, Ting;Yan, Jianghua;
Vol. 48 , No. 1 , pp. 116-128
500 views DOI Abstract
2019
Rabdosia rubescens Linn: green synthesis of gold nanoparticles and their anticancer effects against human lung cancer cells A549
Zhang X.
Vol. 47 , pp. 2171-2178
474 views DOI
2016
evaluating superoxide dismutase (sod), glutathione (gsh), malondialdehyde (mda) and the histological changes of the lung tissue after γ-irradiation in rats
;Abolhasan Rezaeyan;Gholam Hassan Haddadi;Massood Hosseinzadeh
Vol. 6 , No. 2 , pp. 235-245
474 views Abstract
2016
the effects of resistance exercises and yoga on the life quality and the muscle strength of patients with knee osteoarthritis: a systemic review of the previous literatures
;Vahid Mazloum;Vahid Sobhani
Vol. 6 , No. 2 , pp. 138-145
460 views Abstract
2016
relationship between maternal blood vitamin d levels and pregnancy outcomes: a review article
;Maryam Rostami;Fahimeh Ramezani Tehrani;Masoomeh Simbar;Farhad Hossein Panah
Vol. 6 , No. 1 , pp. 1-18
446 views Abstract
2013
cloning and expression of leptospira lipl32 antigen as a candidate for rapid diagnosis
;Nooshin Sohrabi;Shohreh Azimi
Vol. 3 , No. 2 , pp. 124-129
446 views Abstract
2019
Synthesis of gold nanoparticles from leaf Panax notoginseng and its anticancer activity in pancreatic cancer PANC-1 cell lines
Wang L.
Vol. 47 , pp. 1216-1223
421 views DOI
2019
Synthesis and characterization of gold nanoparticles from aqueous leaf extract of Alternanthera sessilis and its anticancer activity on cervical cancer cells (HeLa)
Qian L.
Vol. 47 , pp. 1173-1180
403 views DOI
View All 50 Articles
42
Overall
Below Average
31
35
30
40
38
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

41.7/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

31.0/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

38.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.