applied biological chemistry | Journament

Journal Ranking

#294 / 33,897
📉 Poor
Overall Score
38.6/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
30
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
34
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 5 часов назад

applied biological chemistry

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Индексации
scopus
Краткое название applied biological chemistry
Сокращённое название applied biological chemistry
ISSN
Цели и охват
URL
Инструкции для авторов

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (53 total)

2016
the role of big five factors on predicting job crafting propensities amongst administrative employees in a south african tertiary institution
;Clement Bell;Noxolo Njoli
Vol. 14 , No. 1 , pp. e1-e11
405 views DOI Abstract
2019
Gold nanoparticles conjugated with resveratrol induce cell cycle arrest in MCF-7 cell lines
Lee D.
Vol. 62 , pp. 0-0
353 views DOI
2019
Evaluation of antioxidant and antimicrobial activity of phenolic lipids produced by the transesterification of 4-hydroxyphenylacetic acid and triglycerides
Sari M.
Vol. 62 , pp. 0-0
311 views DOI
2016
work stressors, job insecurity, union support, job satisfaction and safety outcomes within the iron ore mining environment
;Nicolaas W.H. Smit;Leon T. de Beer;Jaco Pienaar
Vol. 14 , No. 1 , pp. e1-e13
284 views DOI Abstract
2015
work engagement and meaningful work across generational cohorts
;Crystal Hoole;Jackie Bonnema
Vol. 13 , No. 1 , pp. e1-e11
272 views DOI Abstract
2014
politicisation of performance appraisals
;Sonia Swanepoel;Petrus A. Botha;Nancy B. Mangonyane
Vol. 12 , No. 1 , pp. e1-e9
271 views DOI Abstract
2017
the relationship between demographic variables and well-being of women in south african workplaces
;Madelyn Geldenhuys;Carolina M. Henn
Vol. 15 , pp. e1-e15
267 views DOI Abstract
2018
role stress and turnover intentions among information technology personnel in south africa: the role of supervisor support
;Rennie Naidoo
Vol. 16 , pp. e1-e10
264 views DOI Abstract
2010
technology and entrepreneurial orientation at the organisational level in the johannesburg area
;Boris Urban
Vol. 8 , No. 1 , pp. e1-e9
261 views DOI Abstract
2019
Correction to: Anti-inflammatory and antioxidant effects of 2, 7-dihydroxy-4, 6-dimethoxy phenanthrene isolated from Dioscorea batatas Decne (Applied Biological Chemistry, (2019), 62, 1, (29), 10.1186/s13765-019-0436-2)
Lim J.
Vol. 62 , pp. 0-0
257 views DOI
View All 53 Articles
39
Overall
Poor
30
15
30
40
34
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

38.6/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.3/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

33.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.