Indexed in Journament

Schizophrenia Bulletin Open

EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
52.4 / 100
Journament Score
Average
Ranked #104 of 29,301 scored journals (34,035 indexed)
23 Articles
Scores higher than 99.6% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name SBO

Quality Profile

4 of 12 dimensions measured
Engagement 30.9
Timeliness 90.0
Community Impact 14.3
Content Distribution 73.2
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

8 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left out entirely rather than plotted as zero, and with 4 dimensions measured there is not enough of a profile to draw as a shape.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for Schizophrenia Bulletin Open
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.9 30.6
Accessibility — 23.3
Timeliness 90.0 3.0
Diversity — 25.9
Innovation — 24.1
Community Impact 14.3 6.7
Content Distribution 73.2 89.8
Content Quality — 55.1
Ethics & Transparency — 40.5
Editorial Standards — 33.0
Publication Regularity — 52.9
Geographic Reach — 30.4

Publications Per Year

Articles (23)

2026
From Micro Molecular To Functional Levels Through Macro Structures: Mediation Of Structural Brain Changes On The Relationship Between Oxidative Stress And Cognition In Early Onset Psychosis
65 views DOI Abstract
2026
Oxidative damage induced disruption of mitochondrial quality control underlying abnormal energy metabolism in peripheral leukocytes of schizophrenia patients
59 views DOI Abstract
2026
Potential mechanisms of change in VR-CBT and standard CBT for schizophrenia-related paranoia: a mediation analysis from the FaceYourFears trial
54 views DOI Abstract
2025
Attitudes Driving Regional Differences in LAI Antipsychotic Utilization for Schizophrenia Among Healthcare Professionals, Patients, and Caregivers (ADVANCE): Results From a Multinational Survey Study
53 views DOI Abstract
2026
Was Kraepelin Prescient Regarding Excitation-Inhibition Imbalance in Schizophrenia?
51 views DOI Abstract
2026
The relationship between social media and schizophrenia and other psychotic disorders: a systematic review
50 views DOI Abstract
2026
The Lived Experience of Paranoia: Systematic Review of Qualitative Studies
49 views DOI Abstract
2026
Co-Design of a Novel Desirability of Outcome Ranking (DOOR) for Medication Trials in Psychosis
49 views DOI Abstract
2026
The Relationship Between Schizotypy and Latent Inhibition and Conditioned Inhibition
48 views DOI Abstract
2026
SUBJECTIVE PERCEPTIONS OF DIGITAL PHENOTYPING MEASURES OF NEGATIVE SYMPTOMS AMONG INDIVIDUALS AT CLINICAL HIGH RISK FOR PSYCHOSIS AND THEIR RELATIVES
46 views DOI Abstract
2026
Psychometric properties of ambulatory and passive measures of negative symptoms: A systematic review
18 views DOI Abstract
2026
Visual Target P3b Amplitude Mediates the Relationship between Childhood Traumatic Experiences and Social Functioning in People at Clinical High Risk for Psychosis
24 views DOI Abstract
2026
Better safe than sorry? Exploratory associations between fear-learning processes and later paranoia in threat-exposed adolescents in standardized Virtual Reality environments
37 views DOI Abstract
2026
Association between delusions, belief flexibility, and cognitive control in schizophrenia – a 6-month repeated-measures study
45 views DOI Abstract
2026
SUBJECTIVE PERCEPTIONS OF DIGITAL PHENOTYPING MEASURES OF NEGATIVE SYMPTOMS AMONG INDIVIDUALS AT CLINICAL HIGH RISK FOR PSYCHOSIS AND THEIR RELATIVES
46 views DOI Abstract
2026
Co-Design of a Novel Desirability of Outcome Ranking (DOOR) for Medication Trials in Psychosis
49 views DOI Abstract
2026
Was Kraepelin Prescient Regarding Excitation-Inhibition Imbalance in Schizophrenia?
51 views DOI Abstract
2026
The Relationship Between Schizotypy and Latent Inhibition and Conditioned Inhibition
48 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
52.4/100 · Average
Ranked #104 of 29,301 scored
(34,035 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

52.4/100

Tier: Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.9/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

14.3/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

90.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

73.2/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.