Indexed in Journament

Interacting with Computers

ISSN 0953-5438· Oxford University Press· EN

Journal Website Guide for Authors Certificate of Indexing
Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
30.2 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #22,573 of 26,281 scored journals (33,995 indexed)
7 Articles
Scores higher than 14.1% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Interacting with Computers is an international, peer-reviewed journal focusing on the design, evaluation, analysis and theory of human-computer interaction. The journal is interdisciplinary and welcomes contributions from computing, psychology, design, management, and other relevant fields. It publishes high-quality papers that address significant issues in the field and have the potential to advance our understanding of how people interact with computers.
Short Name Interacting with Computers
Abbreviated Name Interacting with Computers
ISSN 0953-5438
URL https://academic.oup.com/iwc
Author Instructions https://academic.oup.com/iwc/pages/General_Instructions

Quality Profile

6 of 12 dimensions measured
Engagement 30.3
Accessibility 30.0
Timeliness 70.0
Innovation 26.0
Community Impact 2.9
Content Distribution 17.5
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

6 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left out entirely rather than plotted as zero, and with 6 dimensions measured there is not enough of a profile to draw as a shape.

Show the numbers
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.3 30.0
Accessibility 30.0 19.2
Timeliness 70.0 27.9
Diversity — 29.8
Innovation 26.0 34.2
Community Impact 2.9 18.9
Content Distribution 17.5 87.4
Content Quality — 55.5
Ethics & Transparency — 40.2
Editorial Standards — 33.4
Publication Regularity — 53.2
Geographic Reach — 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (7)

2000
What is beautiful is usable
Noam Tractinsky, Adi Katz, D Ikar
660 views DOI Abstract
2010
Needs, affect, and interactive products – Facets of user experience
Marc Hassenzahl, Sarah Diefenbach, Anja S. Göritz
142 views DOI Abstract
2003
A Unifying Reference Framework for multi-target user interfaces
Gaëlle Calvary, Joëlle Coutaz, David Thévenin, Quentin Limbourg, Laurent Bouillon, Jean Vanderdonckt
35 views DOI Abstract
2010
Socio-technical systems: From design methods to systems engineering
Gordon Baxter, Ian Sommerville
25 views DOI Abstract
2026
Does technology overload you in more than one way? Psychometric properties of Technology Overload Scale
Henrik Lassila, Talayeh Aledavood, Juhi Kulshrestha, Janne Lindqvist
14 views DOI Abstract
2026
Beyond accuracy: user perception of differential privacy in speech emotion recognition
Le Fang, Jiajuan Li, Cong Fang, Xingtong Chen, Yujie Zhu, Yan Xu, Stephen Jia Wang
13 views DOI Abstract
2026
Responsible automation. Exploring the impact of device automation on task responsibility for the task result in a field study
Elisabeth Moosheimer, Sarah Diefenbach
10 views DOI Abstract
2026
Beyond accuracy: user perception of differential privacy in speech emotion recognition
Le Fang, Jiajuan Li, Cong Fang, Xingtong Chen, Yujie Zhu, Yan Xu, Stephen Jia Wang
13 views DOI Abstract
2026
Does technology overload you in more than one way? Psychometric properties of Technology Overload Scale
Henrik Lassila, Talayeh Aledavood, Juhi Kulshrestha, Janne Lindqvist
14 views DOI Abstract
2026
Responsible automation. Exploring the impact of device automation on task responsibility for the task result in a field study
Elisabeth Moosheimer, Sarah Diefenbach
10 views DOI Abstract
2010
Needs, affect, and interactive products – Facets of user experience
Marc Hassenzahl, Sarah Diefenbach, Anja S. Göritz
142 views DOI Abstract
2010
Socio-technical systems: From design methods to systems engineering
Gordon Baxter, Ian Sommerville
25 views DOI Abstract
2003
A Unifying Reference Framework for multi-target user interfaces
Gaëlle Calvary, Joëlle Coutaz, David Thévenin, Quentin Limbourg, Laurent Bouillon, Jean Vanderdonckt
35 views DOI Abstract
2000
What is beautiful is usable
Noam Tractinsky, Adi Katz, D Ikar
660 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
30.2/100 · Poor
Ranked #22,573 of 26,281 scored
(33,995 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.
Journament

Overall Quality Score

30.2/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.3/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

30.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

26.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

2.9/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

70.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

17.5/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.