Articulating design reasoning for intangible cultural heritage in human–computer interaction: dimensions, tensions, and implications

Clicks: 32
ID: 326873
2026
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Emerging

Ranked #8 of 9 articles by views in Interacting with Computers

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Abstract This paper presents a systematic literature review of design approaches used to support the dissemination of intangible cultural heritage (ICH). While prior work has explored various digital interventions for heritage preservation, few studies have synthesized the design logics, participation models, and representational strategies that underpin such systems. This study aims to bridge these gaps through a systematic literature review of ICH research within human–computer interaction, focusing on design approaches. Drawing from Scopus, Web of Science, and the ACM Digital Library, 1533 papers were identified, of which 115 were selected for full-text analysis. Rather than cataloging technologies or applications, the review synthesizes how interaction decisions are shaped through design approaches, participation models, media modalities, and representational strategies. Based on this synthesis, we articulate a five-dimensional design space for reasoning about interaction with ICH, encompassing interaction mechanism, media modality, participation model, cultural positioning, and emotional strategy. The analysis reveals recurring design tensions, including reproduction versus interpretation, community authority versus affective accessibility, and structure versus openness. By framing ICH as an extreme context for interaction design, this work contributes a conceptual lens for understanding interaction in settings involving tacit knowledge, cultural authority, and situated participation, with implications beyond heritage contexts.
Reference Key
openalex_W7204491179 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors
Journal Interacting with Computers
Year 2026
DOI
10.1093/iwc/iwag041
URL
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.