Indexed in Journament

Oxford University Press eBooks

Oxford University Press· EN

Certificate of Indexing
Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
34.8 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #16,962 of 18,861 scored journals (33,995 indexed)
1,517 Articles
Scores higher than 10% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name Oxford University Press eBooks
Abbreviated Name Oxford University Press eBooks

Quality Profile

4 of 12 dimensions measured
Engagement 30.4
Timeliness 100.0
Community Impact 3.6
Content Distribution 3.8
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

8 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left out entirely rather than plotted as zero, and with 4 dimensions measured there is not enough of a profile to draw as a shape.

Show the numbers
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.4 29.9
Accessibility — 19.8
Timeliness 100.0 42.2
Diversity — 30.0
Innovation — 38.3
Community Impact 3.6 28.6
Content Distribution 3.8 84.6
Content Quality — 54.2
Ethics & Transparency — 39.5
Editorial Standards — 32.5
Publication Regularity — 51.6
Geographic Reach — 30.0

Publications Per Year

Articles (1,517)

2009
The Theory of the Leisure Class
Thorstein Veblen; C. Wright Mills
4,937 views DOI
2022
Business Research Methods
Emma Bell, Alan Bryman, Bill Harley
248 views DOI Abstract
1996
War before civilization
Lawrence H. Keeley
127 views Abstract
2022
Atkins’ Physical Chemistry
Peter Atkins, Julio de Paula, James Keeler
86 views DOI Abstract
2023
Official Methods of Analysis of AOAC INTERNATIONAL
Patricia Cunniff
79 views DOI
2018
Networks
M. E. J. Newman
65 views DOI Abstract
2023
Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Molecular Simulation
Mark E. Tuckerman
37 views DOI Abstract
2012
Organic Chemistry
Jonathan Clayden, Nick Greeves, Stuart Warren
33 views DOI Abstract
2023
An Introduction to Medicinal Chemistry
Graham L. Patrick
27 views DOI Abstract
2023
Handbook of Religion and Health
Harold G. Koenig, Tyler J. VanderWeele, John R. Peteet
27 views DOI Abstract
2026
Vijayanagara Legacies in Mughal Period India
Mark T. Lycett, Kathleen D. Morrison
1 views DOI Abstract
2026
The Maritime Sector
Gelina Harlaftis
DOI Abstract
2026
Translating Faith
Saambavi Sivaji
DOI Abstract
2026
Spatial Analysis, Landscape Modelling, and Mobility Simulation in Mountain Environments
Francesco Carrer, Isaac Ullah
DOI Abstract
2026
Global Capital Markets and External Debt
Liudmila Malyshava
DOI Abstract
2026
Artisans and Artists
David Hills
DOI Abstract
2026
Mountain Meanings
Brian A. Stewart, Sam Challis
DOI Abstract
2026
Toward a decolonial approach to language socialization
Eduardo Lactaoen, Martin Guardado
DOI Abstract
2026
Input and participation frameworks in early childhood
Nadxieli Toledo Bustamante
DOI Abstract
2026
Teaching, Learning, and the Pedagogy of EMDR Therapy
Derek Farrell, Matthew D. Kiernan
DOI Abstract
Journament Score
34.8/100 · Poor
Ranked #16,962 of 18,861 scored
(33,995 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.
Journament

Overall Quality Score

34.8/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.4/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

3.6/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

100.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

3.8/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.