journal of optimization in industrial engineering | Journament

Journal Ranking

#97 / 33,718
📊 Below Average
Overall Score
45.0/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
55
Accessibility
60
Timeliness
30
Diversity
40
Innovation
50
Community Impact
45
Ethics & Transparency
30
Content Quality
50
Editorial Diversity
40
Publication Regularity
40
Geographic Reach
35
Updated 2 weeks ago

journal of optimization in industrial engineering

Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
doaj
Short Name journal of optimization in industrial engineering
Abbreviated Name journal of optimization in industrial engineering
ISSN
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (9 total)

2015
Design of H� Congestion Controller for TCP Networks Based on LMI Formulation
Fakharian, Ahmad;Abbasi, Amir;
Vol. 8 , No. 17 , pp. 51-56
353 views Abstract
2015
descriptive qualitative method of evaluation from the viewpoint of math teachers and its comparison with the quantitative evaluation (giving scores) method (a case study on the primary schools for girls in zone 1 of tehran city)
;Farnaz Ostad-Ali;Mohammad Hasan Behzadi;Ahmad Shahvarani
Vol. 2015 , No. 1 , pp. 50-56
302 views DOI Abstract
2019
A Multi-Objective Fuzzy Approach to Closed-Loop Supply Chain Network Design with Regard to Dynamic Pricing
, Soroush Avakh Darestani;Pourasadollah, Faranak;
Vol. 12 , No. 1 , pp. 173-194
245 views Abstract
2013
does the application of instructional mathematics software have enough efficiency?
;Zahra Kalantarnia;Elahe Masoum
Vol. 2013 , pp. 1-6
225 views DOI Abstract
2013
the examining mathematical word problems solving ability under efficient representation aspect
;Maryam Sajadi;Parvaneh Amiripour;Mohsen Rostamy-Malkhalifeh
Vol. 2013 , pp. 1-11
222 views DOI Abstract
2019
A Regret Minimization Approach in Product Portfolio Management with Respect to Customers' Price-sensitivity
Esmaeili, M.
Vol. 12 , pp. 93-102
219 views DOI
2016
structural modeling for influence of mathematics self-concept, motivation to learn mathematics and self-regulation learning on mathematics academic achievement
;Hamideh Jafari Koshkouei;Ahmad Shahvarani;Mohammad Hassan Behzadi;Mohsen Rostamy-Malkhalifeh
Vol. 2016 , No. 1 , pp. 1-12
213 views DOI Abstract
2015
enhancing the blended learning experience of calculus i students
;A. Al-Ghassani;H. Al Shamsi;M. Islam;N. Al-Salti;I. Al-Hasni
Vol. 2015 , No. 1 , pp. 20-34
206 views DOI Abstract
2013
a study of dependence between culture and learning mathematics
;Fatemeh Khaleghpanah-Noughabi;Mohammad-Hassan Behzadi;Ahmad Shahvarani
Vol. 2013 , pp. 1-6
177 views DOI Abstract
45
Overall
Below Average
55
60
40
50
45
30
30
50
40
40
35
Journament

Overall Quality Score

45.0/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

55.0/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

60.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

40.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

Estimated 2 countries represented

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

50.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

45.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

30.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

30.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

50.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

40.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

40.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

35.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Estimated 2 countries represented

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.