Indexed in Journament

journal of optimization in industrial engineering

EN

Certificate of Indexing
Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
27.3 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #24,749 of 29,297 scored journals (34,016 indexed)
9 Articles
Scores higher than 15.5% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →
AI Quality Analysis
39.6 / 100
Separate paid analysis — does not affect the Journament Score or ranking.

About This Journal

Short Name journal of optimization in industrial engineering
Abbreviated Name journal of optimization in industrial engineering

Quality Profile

11 of 12 dimensions measured
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

1 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left as gaps in the shape rather than plotted as zero.

Show the numbers
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 31.0 30.5
Accessibility — 23.1
Timeliness 0.0 3.0
Diversity 5.6 26.4
Innovation 22.5 24.1
Community Impact 8.6 4.5
Content Distribution 89.3 89.3
Content Quality 50.0 55.1
Ethics & Transparency 30.0 40.5
Editorial Standards 40.0 33.0
Publication Regularity 40.0 52.9
Geographic Reach 35.0 30.4

Publications Per Year

Articles (9)

2015
Design of H� Congestion Controller for TCP Networks Based on LMI Formulation
Fakharian, Ahmad;Abbasi, Amir;
Vol. 8 , No. 17 , pp. 51-56
454 views Abstract
2015
descriptive qualitative method of evaluation from the viewpoint of math teachers and its comparison with the quantitative evaluation (giving scores) method (a case study on the primary schools for girls in zone 1 of tehran city)
;Farnaz Ostad-Ali;Mohammad Hasan Behzadi;Ahmad Shahvarani
Vol. 2015 , No. 1 , pp. 50-56
445 views DOI Abstract
2019
A Multi-Objective Fuzzy Approach to Closed-Loop Supply Chain Network Design with Regard to Dynamic Pricing
, Soroush Avakh Darestani;Pourasadollah, Faranak;
Vol. 12 , No. 1 , pp. 173-194
358 views Abstract
2013
the examining mathematical word problems solving ability under efficient representation aspect
;Maryam Sajadi;Parvaneh Amiripour;Mohsen Rostamy-Malkhalifeh
Vol. 2013 , pp. 1-11
358 views DOI Abstract
2013
does the application of instructional mathematics software have enough efficiency?
;Zahra Kalantarnia;Elahe Masoum
Vol. 2013 , pp. 1-6
348 views DOI Abstract
2019
A Regret Minimization Approach in Product Portfolio Management with Respect to Customers' Price-sensitivity
Esmaeili, M.
Vol. 12 , pp. 93-102
336 views DOI
2015
enhancing the blended learning experience of calculus i students
;A. Al-Ghassani;H. Al Shamsi;M. Islam;N. Al-Salti;I. Al-Hasni
Vol. 2015 , No. 1 , pp. 20-34
326 views DOI Abstract
2016
structural modeling for influence of mathematics self-concept, motivation to learn mathematics and self-regulation learning on mathematics academic achievement
;Hamideh Jafari Koshkouei;Ahmad Shahvarani;Mohammad Hassan Behzadi;Mohsen Rostamy-Malkhalifeh
Vol. 2016 , No. 1 , pp. 1-12
325 views DOI Abstract
2013
a study of dependence between culture and learning mathematics
;Fatemeh Khaleghpanah-Noughabi;Mohammad-Hassan Behzadi;Ahmad Shahvarani
Vol. 2013 , pp. 1-6
285 views DOI Abstract
2019
A Multi-Objective Fuzzy Approach to Closed-Loop Supply Chain Network Design with Regard to Dynamic Pricing
, Soroush Avakh Darestani;Pourasadollah, Faranak;
Vol. 12 , No. 1 , pp. 173-194
358 views Abstract
2019
A Regret Minimization Approach in Product Portfolio Management with Respect to Customers' Price-sensitivity
Esmaeili, M.
Vol. 12 , pp. 93-102
336 views DOI
2016
structural modeling for influence of mathematics self-concept, motivation to learn mathematics and self-regulation learning on mathematics academic achievement
;Hamideh Jafari Koshkouei;Ahmad Shahvarani;Mohammad Hassan Behzadi;Mohsen Rostamy-Malkhalifeh
Vol. 2016 , No. 1 , pp. 1-12
325 views DOI Abstract
2015
enhancing the blended learning experience of calculus i students
;A. Al-Ghassani;H. Al Shamsi;M. Islam;N. Al-Salti;I. Al-Hasni
Vol. 2015 , No. 1 , pp. 20-34
326 views DOI Abstract
2015
descriptive qualitative method of evaluation from the viewpoint of math teachers and its comparison with the quantitative evaluation (giving scores) method (a case study on the primary schools for girls in zone 1 of tehran city)
;Farnaz Ostad-Ali;Mohammad Hasan Behzadi;Ahmad Shahvarani
Vol. 2015 , No. 1 , pp. 50-56
445 views DOI Abstract
2015
Design of H� Congestion Controller for TCP Networks Based on LMI Formulation
Fakharian, Ahmad;Abbasi, Amir;
Vol. 8 , No. 17 , pp. 51-56
454 views Abstract
2013
a study of dependence between culture and learning mathematics
;Fatemeh Khaleghpanah-Noughabi;Mohammad-Hassan Behzadi;Ahmad Shahvarani
Vol. 2013 , pp. 1-6
285 views DOI Abstract
2013
does the application of instructional mathematics software have enough efficiency?
;Zahra Kalantarnia;Elahe Masoum
Vol. 2013 , pp. 1-6
348 views DOI Abstract
2013
the examining mathematical word problems solving ability under efficient representation aspect
;Maryam Sajadi;Parvaneh Amiripour;Mohsen Rostamy-Malkhalifeh
Vol. 2013 , pp. 1-11
358 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
27.3/100 · Poor
Ranked #24,749 of 29,297 scored
(34,016 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis 39.6/100
Journament

Overall Quality Score

27.3/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

31.0/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

5.6/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

Estimated 2 countries represented

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

22.5/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

8.6/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

89.3/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

30.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

50.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

40.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

40.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

35.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Estimated 2 countries represented

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.