Indexed in Journament

Ulum al-Sunnah

ISSN 2959-2224 (Online) | 2959-2216 (Print)· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
35.4 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #11,392 of 29,324 scored journals (34,008 indexed)
46 Articles
Scores higher than 61.1% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Aim ULŪM-AL-SUNNAH Research Journal of Islāmic Studies aims to promote innovative academic research on contemporary matters and convolutions of modern-day world in addition to the orthodox approach of research specially from the perspectives of Ḥadīth & Sīrah, while generally from any other accepted source of Islām. Scope The Research Journal “ULŪM-AL-SUNNAH” seeks to publish articles that explore Islāmic Knowledge especially in the field of Ḥadīth & Sīrah Studies, and generally to Qur’ānic Studies, Sharī‘ah & Law, Comparative Religion Studies, Islāmic History, Ṣufīsm, Economics, Politics, Culture & Civilizations, Social Sciences and other disciplines with link to Islām.
Short Name Ulūm al-Sunnah
Abbreviated Name UAS
ISSN 2959-2224 (Online) | 2959-2216 (Print)
URL https://journals.iub.edu.pk/index.php/uas/index
Author Instructions https://journals.iub.edu.pk/index.php/uas/author-guidelines

Quality Profile

6 of 12 dimensions measured
Engagement 30.9
Accessibility 30.0
Timeliness 20.0
Innovation 70.0
Community Impact 7.1
Content Distribution 49.2
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

6 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left out entirely rather than plotted as zero, and with 6 dimensions measured there is not enough of a profile to draw as a shape.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for Ulum al-Sunnah
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.9 30.4
Accessibility 30.0 19.1
Timeliness 20.0 9.2
Diversity 25.8
Innovation 70.0 27.4
Community Impact 7.1 7.8
Content Distribution 49.2 88.6
Content Quality 55.5
Ethics & Transparency 40.2
Editorial Standards 33.4
Publication Regularity 53.2
Geographic Reach 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (46)

2024
Leprosy Disease: An Islamic Historical and Pakistani Context : Introduction, Leprosay disease ,Its kinds
Vol. 2 , No. 02 , pp. 01-17
301 views DOI Abstract
2024
Mental Health and Spiritual Well-Being in the Qurān: Addressing Modern Psychological Challenges through Islamic Teachings
Vol. 2 , No. 02 , pp. 33-40
243 views DOI Abstract
2024
2023
A Critical Review of Anti-Islamic Forces in Prophetﷺ Era
Vol. 1 , No. 02 , pp. 14-25
131 views DOI Abstract
2023
The Mathematical Miracles of the Holy Qur'an
Vol. 1 , No. 01 , pp. 20-34
131 views DOI Abstract
2024
Analytical Study of “Welfare-Oriented Islamic Democratic state” In Context of “Rîasāt e Mādîna”.
Vol. 2 , No. 02 , pp. 41-58
74 views DOI Abstract
2024
Mental Health and Spiritual Well-Being in the Qurān: Addressing Modern Psychological Challenges through Islamic Teachings
Vol. 2 , No. 02 , pp. 33-40
243 views DOI Abstract
2024
Analytical Review of Halal and Haram Food in the Light of Islamic Legal Maxims (Al-Qawa’id Al-Fiqhiyyah)
Vol. 2 , No. 02 , pp. 18-32
47 views DOI Abstract
2024
Leprosy Disease: An Islamic Historical and Pakistani Context : Introduction, Leprosay disease ,Its kinds
Vol. 2 , No. 02 , pp. 01-17
301 views DOI Abstract
2024
Journament Score
35.4/100 · Poor
Ranked #11,392 of 29,324 scored
(34,008 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

35.4/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.9/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

30.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

7.1/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

20.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

49.2/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.