Indexed in Journament

technological and economic development of economy

ISSN 2029-4913· EN

Certificate of Indexing
Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
38.5/100
Journament Score
#11,309
Journament Rank
18
Articles Indexed

About This Journal

Short Name technological and economic development of economy
Abbreviated Name technological and economic development of economy
ISSN 2029-4913

Indexings

doaj ulakbim soc

Tools & Certificate of Indexing

Certificate of Indexing
Quality Badge Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's verified indexing scores on your website with our self-contained widget.

One-Line JavaScript Embed:
Advantages: Single-line script, seamless DOM integration, clickable badges linking to full journal profile.
Standard iFrame Embed Code:
Widget Preview:

Publications Per Year

Articles (18)

2018
Multiattribute evaluation of organic and inorganic agricultural food investments using fuzzy TOPSIS
Suder, Asli;Kahraman, Cengiz;
Vol. 24 , No. 3 , pp. -
465 views Abstract
2016
Multivariate Granger causality between CO2 emissions, energy intensity and economic growth in Portugal: evidence from cointegration and causality analysis
Shahbaz, Muhammad;Jam, Farooq Ahmed;Bibi, Sadia;Loganathan, Nanthakumar;
Vol. 22 , No. 1 , pp. -
447 views Abstract
2010
Automation of update of digital national geo‐reference databases / Nacionalinių georeferencinių duomenų bazių atnaujinimo automatizavimas
Stankevičius, Žilvinas;Beconytė, Giedrė;Kalantaitė, Aušra;
Vol. 16 , No. 2 , pp. -
437 views Abstract
2019
Board of director’s gender diversity and its impact on earnings management: An empirical analysis for select european firms
Saona, P.
Vol. 25 , pp. 634-663
361 views DOI
2019
Remanufacturing with patented technique royalty under asymmetric information and uncertain markets
Gao, Jie;Liang, Zhilei;Shang, Jennifer;Xu, Zeshui;
, pp. -
361 views Abstract
2014
proteomic insights into non-small cell lung cancer: new ideas for cancer diagnosis and therapy from a functional viewpoint
;Johannes Linxweiler;Laxmikanth Kollipara;René P. Zahedi;Pavel Lampel;Richard Zimmermann;Markus Greiner
Vol. 4 , No. C , pp. 25-39
349 views DOI Abstract
2015
A hybrid model for decision-making in the information and Communications Technology sector
Cid-López, Andrés;Hornos, Miguel J.;Carrasco, Ramón Alberto;Herrera-Viedma, Enrique;
Vol. 21 , No. 5 , pp. -
336 views Abstract
2014
proteomic and genomic analysis reveals novel campylobacter jejuni outer membrane proteins and potential heterogeneity
;Eleanor Watson;Aileen Sherry;Neil F. Inglis;Alex Lainson;Dushyanth Jyothi;Raja Yaga;Erin Manson;Lisa Imrie;Paul Everest;David G.E. Smith
Vol. 4 , No. C , pp. 184-194
313 views DOI Abstract
2014
Measuring bank efficiency: DEA application
Titko, Jelena;Stankevičienė, Jelena;Lāce, Nataļja;
Vol. 20 , No. 4 , pp. -
307 views Abstract
2016
Project network management: risks and contributors from the viewpoint of contractors and sub-contractors
Hwang, Bon Gang;Ng, Han Boey;
Vol. 22 , No. 4 , pp. -
295 views Abstract
2019
Remanufacturing with patented technique royalty under asymmetric information and uncertain markets
Gao, Jie;Liang, Zhilei;Shang, Jennifer;Xu, Zeshui;
, pp. -
361 views Abstract
2019
Board of director’s gender diversity and its impact on earnings management: An empirical analysis for select european firms
Saona, P.
Vol. 25 , pp. 634-663
361 views DOI
2018
Employing FAHP to de-codify the determinants of trade agreements: a case of the EU-India trade talks
Khorana, Sangeeta;Cho, Jaemin;Lee, Jaeho;Disegna, Marta;
Vol. 24 , No. 6 , pp. -
62 views Abstract
2018
Multiattribute evaluation of organic and inorganic agricultural food investments using fuzzy TOPSIS
Suder, Asli;Kahraman, Cengiz;
Vol. 24 , No. 3 , pp. -
465 views Abstract
2017
comprehensive mass spectrometry based biomarker discovery and validation platform as applied to diabetic kidney disease
;Scott D. Bringans;Jun Ito;Thomas Stoll;Kaye Winfield;Michael Phillips;Kirsten Peters;Wendy A. Davis;Timothy M.E. Davis;Richard J. Lipscombe
Vol. 14 , No. C , pp. 1-10
248 views DOI Abstract
2016
the eupa standardization initiative
;F. Canals;F. Elortza;A. Paradela;G. Corthals;Michelle Camenzuli;A. Muñoz;O. Schiltz;Anne Gonzalez de Peredo;A Sickman;C. Borchers;Fernando J. Corrales
Vol. 11 , No. C , pp. 31-32
97 views DOI
2016
towards a functional definition of the mitochondrial human proteome
;Mauro Fasano;Tiziana Alberio;Mohan Babu;Emma Lundberg;Andrea Urbani
Vol. 10 , No. C , pp. 24-27
141 views DOI Abstract
2016
Multivariate Granger causality between CO2 emissions, energy intensity and economic growth in Portugal: evidence from cointegration and causality analysis
Shahbaz, Muhammad;Jam, Farooq Ahmed;Bibi, Sadia;Loganathan, Nanthakumar;
Vol. 22 , No. 1 , pp. -
447 views Abstract
2016
Project network management: risks and contributors from the viewpoint of contractors and sub-contractors
Hwang, Bon Gang;Ng, Han Boey;
Vol. 22 , No. 4 , pp. -
295 views Abstract
2015
detecting significant changes in protein abundance
;Kai Kammers;Robert N. Cole;Calvin Tiengwe;Ingo Ruczinski
Vol. 7 , No. C , pp. 11-19
266 views DOI Abstract
38
Overall
Poor
31
15
30
40
35
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

38.5/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.6/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

34.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.