finance research letters | Journament

Journal Ranking

#2052 / 33,958
📊 Below Average
Overall Score
41.1/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
37
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 2 weeks ago

finance research letters

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus ncbi ulakbim soc
Short Name financ res lett
Abbreviated Name finance research letters
ISSN 1544-6123
Aim and Scope
URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/journal/finance-research-letters
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (32 total)

2015
religious musings de s. t. coleridge: a theological and political interpretation for the romantic literature.
;Laura Gavilán
Vol. 1 , No. 2 , pp. 105-115
393 views Abstract
2019
The way to induce private participation in green finance and investment
Taghizadeh-Hesary, F.
Vol. 31 , pp. 98-103
295 views DOI
2015
mystical experience relational language as a way of teresa sanjuanista loving openness to others. interview with maximiliano garcia herraiz, ocd
;ALALITE Argentina;Cecilia Inés Avenatti de Palumbo;Pedro Eugenio Bayá Casal
Vol. 3 , No. 6 , pp. 202-223
285 views Abstract
2020
How does CSR mediate the relationship between culture, religiosity and firm performance?
Ahmed Imran Hunjra,Sabri Boubaker,Murugesh Arunachalam,Asad Mehmood;Ahmed Imran Hunjra;Sabri Boubaker;Murugesh Arunachalam;Asad Mehmood;
, pp. 101587-
272 views DOI
2015
paul tillich understanding about the bible from a interreligious perspective
;Thiago Pinheiro
Vol. 4 , No. 8 , pp. 106-114
266 views Abstract
2019
Analysing the dynamic influence of US macroeconomic news releases on Turkish stock markets
Ekinci, C.
Vol. 31 , pp. 155-164
258 views DOI
2015
alceu amoroso lima’s spiritual itinerary desert and faith’s ecstasy
;Leandro Garcia Rodrigues
Vol. 1 , No. 1 , pp. 124-147
257 views Abstract
2019
Oil price fluctuation, stock market and macroeconomic fundamentals: Evidence from China before and after the financial crisis
Wei, Y.
Vol. 30 , pp. 23-29
246 views DOI
2015
the six swans and the girl some considerations about the salvation in simone weil
;Maria Clara Lucchetti Bingemer
Vol. 1 , No. 1 , pp. 97-123
245 views Abstract
2015
the theory of the text and narration of paul ricoeur and its fruitfulness for theology
;Geraldo De Mori
Vol. 2 , No. 3 , pp. 39-71
243 views Abstract
View All 32 Articles
41
Overall
Below Average
31
35
30
40
37
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

41.1/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

31.2/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

36.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.