Indexed in Journament

finance research letters

ISSN 1544-6123· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
23.1 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #27,997 of 29,312 scored journals (34,012 indexed)
32 Articles
Scores higher than 4.4% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name financ res lett
Abbreviated Name finance research letters
ISSN 1544-6123
URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/journal/finance-research-letters

Quality Profile

7 of 12 dimensions measured
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

5 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left as gaps in the shape rather than plotted as zero.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for finance research letters
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.7 30.4
Accessibility 20.0 20.4
Timeliness 0.0 5.8
Diversity 5.6 24.4
Innovation 19.5 25.7
Community Impact 8.6 5.8
Content Distribution 69.8 88.6
Content Quality 55.5
Ethics & Transparency 40.2
Editorial Standards 33.4
Publication Regularity 53.2
Geographic Reach 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (32)

2019
The way to induce private participation in green finance and investment
Vol. 31 , pp. 98-103
330 views DOI
2020
How does CSR mediate the relationship between culture, religiosity and firm performance?
, pp. 101587-
326 views DOI
2015
mystical experience relational language as a way of teresa sanjuanista loving openness to others. interview with maximiliano garcia herraiz, ocd
Vol. 3 , No. 6 , pp. 202-223
323 views Abstract
2015
paul tillich understanding about the bible from a interreligious perspective
Vol. 4 , No. 8 , pp. 106-114
301 views Abstract
2015
alceu amoroso lima’s spiritual itinerary desert and faith’s ecstasy
Vol. 1 , No. 1 , pp. 124-147
300 views Abstract
2015
the theory of the text and narration of paul ricoeur and its fruitfulness for theology
Vol. 2 , No. 3 , pp. 39-71
292 views Abstract
2015
the six swans and the girl some considerations about the salvation in simone weil
Vol. 1 , No. 1 , pp. 97-123
277 views Abstract
2020
Safe haven or risky hazard? Bitcoin during the Covid-19 bear market.
Vol. 35 , pp. 101607
150 views DOI Abstract
2020
2020
Regulation spillovers across cryptocurrency markets
Vol. 36 , pp. 0-0
228 views DOI
2020
How the cryptocurrency market has performed during COVID 19? A multifractal analysis
Vol. 36 , pp. 101647
203 views DOI Abstract
2020
How does CSR mediate the relationship between culture, religiosity and firm performance?
, pp. 101587-
326 views DOI
2020
2020
2019
Weekly momentum in the commodity futures market
, pp. 0-0
177 views DOI
Journament Score
23.1/100 · Poor
Ranked #27,997 of 29,312 scored
(34,012 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

23.1/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.7/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

5.6/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

19.5/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

8.6/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

69.8/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.