Nutrients | Journament

Journal Ranking

#4 / 33,721
🥈 Very Good
Overall Score
75.0/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
65
Accessibility
80
Timeliness
70
Diversity
60
Innovation
65
Community Impact
70
Ethics & Transparency
50
Content Quality
70
Editorial Diversity
60
Publication Regularity
65
Geographic Reach
60
Updated 1 week ago

Nutrients

Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus ncbi doaj ulakbim sci
Short Name Nutrients
Abbreviated Name nutrients
ISSN 2072-6643
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (375 total)

2019
Analysis of the Influence of Age, BMI, and WHtR on Body Mass Acceptance, Attitudes, and Motivation towards Body Mass Reduction in Overweight and Obese Caucasian Women
Vol. 11 , No. 3 , pp. 542-
603 views Abstract
2017
Estimated Nutritive Value of Low-Price Model Lunch Sets Provided to Garment Workers in Cambodia
Vol. 9 , No. 7 , pp. 782-
515 views Abstract
2019
Polyphenols and IUGR Pregnancies: Effects of Maternal Hydroxytyrosol Supplementation on Hepatic Fat Accretion and Energy and Fatty Acids Profile of Fetal Tissues.
Vol. 11 , No. 7
446 views DOI Abstract
2019
Avocado Oil Extract Modulates Auditory Hair Cell Function through the Regulation of Amino Acid Biosynthesis Genes.
Vol. 11 , No. 1
431 views DOI Abstract
2019
Problematic Internet Use as a Predictor of Eating Disorders in Students: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Study.
Vol. 11 , No. 9
425 views DOI Abstract
2019
The Autophagy Signaling Pathway: A Potential Multifunctional Therapeutic Target of Curcumin in Neurological and Neuromuscular Diseases.
Vol. 11 , No. 8
408 views DOI Abstract
2018
Whole Fruits and Fruit Fiber Emerging Health Effects.
Vol. 10 , No. 12
403 views DOI Abstract
2019
Fat Quantity and Quality, as Part of a Low-Fat, Vegan Diet, Are Associated with Changes in Body Composition, Insulin Resistance, and Insulin Secretion. A 16-Week Randomized Controlled Trial
Vol. 11 , No. 3 , pp. 615-
391 views Abstract
2019
A Multi-Year Examination of Gardening Experience and Fruit and Vegetable Intake During College.
Vol. 11 , No. 9
380 views DOI Abstract
75
Overall
Very Good
65
80
60
65
70
70
50
70
60
65
60

Overall Quality Score

75.0/100

Tier: Very Good

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

65.0/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

80.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

60.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

Estimated 25 countries represented

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

65.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

70.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

70.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

50.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

70.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

60.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

65.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

60.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Estimated 25 countries represented

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.