Indexed in Journament

the international journal of health planning and management

ISSN 1099-1751· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
38.5 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #5,235 of 29,324 scored journals (33,995 indexed)
32 Articles
Scores higher than 82.1% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name int j health plann manage
Abbreviated Name int j health plann manage
ISSN 1099-1751
URL https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10991751

Quality Profile

7 of 12 dimensions measured
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

5 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left as gaps in the shape rather than plotted as zero.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for the international journal of health planning and management
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.6 30.4
Accessibility 20.0 19.1
Timeliness 0.0 9.2
Diversity 65.6 25.8
Innovation 70.0 27.4
Community Impact 9.3 7.8
Content Distribution 63.4 88.6
Content Quality 55.5
Ethics & Transparency 40.2
Editorial Standards 33.4
Publication Regularity 53.2
Geographic Reach 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (32)

2019
Trends and sociodemographic factors of e-cigarette use among adult daily smokers in South Korea.
1,336 views DOI Abstract
2018
Extending health insurance coverage to the informal sector: Lessons from a private micro health insurance scheme in Lagos, Nigeria.
519 views DOI Abstract
2019
Evaluating Mediterranean diet adherence in university student populations: Does this dietary pattern affect students' academic performance and mental health?
467 views DOI Abstract
Policy process for health sector reforms: a case study of Punjab Province (Pakistan).
Vol. 24 , No. 4 , pp. 306-25
467 views DOI Abstract
2019
Public-private partnerships in non-profit hospitals: Case study of China.
452 views DOI Abstract
2019
Financing health care in Bangladesh: Policy responses and challenges towards achieving universal health coverage.
Vol. 34 , No. 1 , pp. e11-e20
449 views DOI Abstract
2019
Impact of improved primary care on patient satisfaction: Results of a pilot study in the University of the Philippines.
435 views DOI Abstract
2019
Factors influencing missed nursing care in public hospitals in Australia: An exploratory mixed methods study.
430 views DOI Abstract
2020
Organisational antecedents of workplace victimisation: The role of organisational climate, culture, leadership, support, and justice in predicting junior doctors' exposure to bullying at work.
Vol. 35 , No. 1 , pp. 346-367
342 views DOI Abstract
2019
Trends and sociodemographic factors of e-cigarette use among adult daily smokers in South Korea.
1,336 views DOI Abstract
2019
2019
A national survey of turnover intention among general practitioners in China.
330 views DOI Abstract
2019
The use of evidence in decision making by hospital managers in Lebanon: A cross-sectional study.
347 views DOI Abstract
2019
Impact of improved primary care on patient satisfaction: Results of a pilot study in the University of the Philippines.
435 views DOI Abstract
2019
Public-private partnerships in non-profit hospitals: Case study of China.
452 views DOI Abstract
2019
Evaluating Mediterranean diet adherence in university student populations: Does this dietary pattern affect students' academic performance and mental health?
467 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
38.5/100 · Poor
Ranked #5,235 of 29,324 scored
(33,995 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

38.5/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.6/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

65.6/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

9.3/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

63.4/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.