Individual vs household: How do different calculation patterns of catastrophic health expenditure matter? New evidence from China's critical illness insurance programme.
Clicks: 406
ID: 16835
2019
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Steady Performance
80.8
/100
406 views
292 readers
Trending
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
SteadyRanked #10 of 32 articles by views in the international journal of health planning and management
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Reducing the incidence and severity of catastrophic health expenditure (CHE) has been considered to be one of the most fundamental goals of the global health care financing system. China, the second largest economy and the most populous country in the world, established a critical illness insurance (CII) programme in 2012 in an effort to protect Chinese residents from CHE shocks. This paper attempts to address whether the different calculation patterns (namely, individuals vs household) of CHE matter under China's CII programme. We compare two CII models built with the World Health Organization's (WHO's) standard and the Chinese standard. Exploiting the latest China family panel studies (CFPS) dataset, we demonstrate that using household as the calculation pattern is more effective in alleviating CHE under a tight premium budget, which is consistent with the international view. This finding raises concerns about the appropriate calculation pattern of CHE in policy making.
| Reference Key |
zhang2019individualthe
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Zhang, Ying;Hu, Ding;Guan, Yongmei;Vanneste, Jacques; |
| Journal | the international journal of health planning and management |
| Year | 2019 |
| DOI |
10.1002/hpm.2885
|
| URL | |
| Keywords | Keywords not found |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.