Indexed in Journament

international journal of play therapy

EN

Certificate of Indexing
Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
25.6 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #26,811 of 29,324 scored journals (34,008 indexed)
13 Articles
Scores higher than 8.5% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name international journal of play therapy
Abbreviated Name international journal of play therapy

Quality Profile

6 of 12 dimensions measured
Engagement 30.4
Timeliness 0.0
Diversity 5.6
Innovation 24.0
Community Impact 2.9
Content Distribution 82.3
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

6 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left out entirely rather than plotted as zero, and with 6 dimensions measured there is not enough of a profile to draw as a shape.

Show the numbers
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.4 30.4
Accessibility — 19.1
Timeliness 0.0 9.2
Diversity 5.6 25.8
Innovation 24.0 27.4
Community Impact 2.9 7.8
Content Distribution 82.3 88.6
Content Quality — 55.5
Ethics & Transparency — 40.2
Editorial Standards — 33.4
Publication Regularity — 53.2
Geographic Reach — 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (13)

2017
evolutions and tendencies regarding the romanian transfer pricing legislation: is there a need for change?
;Ioana NEACSU;Liliana FELEAGA
Vol. 15 , No. 145 , pp. 65-82
398 views DOI Abstract
2016
boardroom diversity and audit fees: director ethnicity, independence and nationality
;Ayoib CHE AHMAD;Salau ABDULMALIK O.
Vol. 14 , No. 136 , pp. 413-423
295 views DOI Abstract
2018
determinants of employees’ psychological ownership on budgetary slack
;Kamisah Ismail;Cheok Mui Yee;Edward Wong Sek Khin
Vol. 16 , No. 149 , pp. 122-130
292 views DOI Abstract
2016
Sandtray supervision: An integrated model for play therapy supervision
Perryman, K.
Vol. 25 , pp. 186-196
273 views DOI
2017
organizational culture and internal control
;Sorin Domnisoru;Radu Ogarca;Isabela Dragomir
Vol. 15 , No. 148 , pp. 628-643
259 views DOI Abstract
2017
ifrs 16 “leases” – consequences on the financial statements and financial indicators
;Marian SACARIN
Vol. 15 , No. 145 , pp. 114-122
257 views DOI Abstract
2017
the role of the internal control systems implementation in the corruption prevention process for the romanian public entities
;Carmen Pirvan;Ileana Nisulescu
Vol. 15 , No. 146 , pp. 254-265
256 views DOI Abstract
2017
Four approaches to using sandtray in play therapy supervision.
Hartwig, E.
Vol. 26 , pp. 230-238
250 views DOI
2012
Sandtray-Worldplay for people who experience chronic mental illness
Schadler, G.
Vol. 21 , pp. 87-99
238 views DOI
2017
using fuzzy c-means clustering algorithm in financial health scoring
;Furkan BASER;Soner GOKTEN;Pinar OKAN GOKTEN
Vol. 15 , No. 147 , pp. 385-394
237 views DOI Abstract
2018
determinants of employees’ psychological ownership on budgetary slack
;Kamisah Ismail;Cheok Mui Yee;Edward Wong Sek Khin
Vol. 16 , No. 149 , pp. 122-130
292 views DOI Abstract
2017
ifrs 16 “leases” – consequences on the financial statements and financial indicators
;Marian SACARIN
Vol. 15 , No. 145 , pp. 114-122
257 views DOI Abstract
2017
the role of the internal control systems implementation in the corruption prevention process for the romanian public entities
;Carmen Pirvan;Ileana Nisulescu
Vol. 15 , No. 146 , pp. 254-265
256 views DOI Abstract
2017
organizational culture and internal control
;Sorin Domnisoru;Radu Ogarca;Isabela Dragomir
Vol. 15 , No. 148 , pp. 628-643
259 views DOI Abstract
2017
using fuzzy c-means clustering algorithm in financial health scoring
;Furkan BASER;Soner GOKTEN;Pinar OKAN GOKTEN
Vol. 15 , No. 147 , pp. 385-394
237 views DOI Abstract
2017
evolutions and tendencies regarding the romanian transfer pricing legislation: is there a need for change?
;Ioana NEACSU;Liliana FELEAGA
Vol. 15 , No. 145 , pp. 65-82
398 views DOI Abstract
2017
Four approaches to using sandtray in play therapy supervision.
Hartwig, E.
Vol. 26 , pp. 230-238
250 views DOI
2016
boardroom diversity and audit fees: director ethnicity, independence and nationality
;Ayoib CHE AHMAD;Salau ABDULMALIK O.
Vol. 14 , No. 136 , pp. 413-423
295 views DOI Abstract
2016
study regarding the creative accounting techniques in management accounting
;Flavius-Andrei GUINEA
Vol. 14 , No. 142 , pp. 1136-1148
140 views DOI Abstract
2016
financial products as alternatives to traditional deposits
;Cristina Lidia MANEA
Vol. 14 , No. 137 , pp. 526-539
191 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
25.6/100 · Poor
Ranked #26,811 of 29,324 scored
(34,008 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.
Journament

Overall Quality Score

25.6/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.4/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

5.6/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

24.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

2.9/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

82.3/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.