nurse education in practice | Journament

Journal Ranking

#2575 / 33,958
📉 Poor
Overall Score
39.7/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
37
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 1 week ago

nurse education in practice

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus ncbi ulakbim sci soc
Short Name nurse educ pract
Abbreviated Name nurse education in practice
ISSN 1873-5223
Aim and Scope
URL https://www.journals.elsevier.com/nurse-education-in-practice
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (32 total)

2019
Accessing the curriculum; university based learning experiences of visually impaired physiotherapy students.
Frank, Helen;McLinden, Mike;Douglas, Graeme;
Vol. 42 , pp. 102620
391 views DOI Abstract
2019
Research on the resilience of Chinese nursing students to workplace vertical violence in clinical practice.
Tian, Lingyun;Zhang, Ying;Li, Xuejiao;Li, Xingxing;Li, Yifang;Ma, Li;Wu, Yuehong;Li, Yinglan;
Vol. 40 , pp. 102624
383 views DOI Abstract
2019
Simulation in midwifery education: A descriptive explorative study exploring students' knowledge, confidence and skills in the care of the preterm neonate.
Stoodley, Cathy;McKellar, Lois;Steen, Mary;Fleet, Julie;
Vol. 42 , pp. 102635
383 views DOI Abstract
2019
Socially Responsible Leadership: A study with nursing and medical students in Turkey.
Sönmez, Betül;İspir, Öznur;Azizoğlu, Fatma;Hapçıoğlu, Seniha Bilge;Yıldırım, Aytolan;
Vol. 36 , pp. 144-150
371 views DOI Abstract
2019
Pedagogical principles and methods underpinning education of health and social care practitioners on experiences and needs of older LGBT+ people: Findings from a systematic review.
Higgins, Agnes;Downes, Carmel;Sheaf, Greg;Bus, Elisa;Connell, Sandra;Hafford-Letchfield, Trish;Jurček, Anže;Pezzella, Alfonso;Rabelink, Irma;Robotham, George;Urek, Mojca;van der Vaart, Nina;Keogh, Brian;
Vol. 40 , pp. 102625
363 views DOI Abstract
2020
Midwives' experiences of learning and teaching being 'with woman': A descriptive phenomenological study.
Bradfield, Zoe;Hauck, Yvonne;Duggan, Ravani;Kelly, Michelle;
Vol. 43 , pp. 102699
357 views DOI Abstract
2019
Can a one-on-one mentorship program reduce the turnover rate of new graduate nurses in China? A longitudinal study.
Zhang, Yuping;Huang, Xin;Xu, Shuangyan;Xu, Caijuan;Feng, Xiuqin;Jin, Jingfen;
Vol. 40 , pp. 102616
349 views DOI Abstract
2019
Mental well-being among nursing students in Slovenia and Northern Ireland: A survey.
Cilar, Leona;Barr, Owen;Štiglic, Gregor;Pajnkihar, Majda;
Vol. 39 , pp. 130-135
330 views DOI Abstract
2020
Comparison of PechaKucha and traditional PowerPoint presentations in nursing education: A randomized controlled study.
Bakcek, Ozgu;Tastan, Sevinc;Iyigun, Emine;Kurtoglu, Pervin;Tastan, Birhan;
Vol. 42 , pp. 102695
325 views DOI Abstract
2019
Competencies on environmental health and pedagogical approaches in the nursing curriculum: A systematic review of the literature.
Lopez-Medina, I M;Álvarez-Nieto, C;Grose, J;Elsbernd, A;Huss, N;Huynen, M;Richardson, J;
Vol. 37 , pp. 1-8
325 views DOI Abstract
View All 32 Articles
40
Overall
Poor
31
35
30
40
37
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

39.7/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.8/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

36.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.