Epidemiology and psychiatric sciences | Journament

Journal Ranking

#919 / 33,971
📊 Below Average
Overall Score
42.9/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
30
Accessibility
50
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
33
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 3 weeks ago

Epidemiology and psychiatric sciences

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus ncbi ulakbim sci soc
Short Name Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci
Abbreviated Name epidemiology and psychiatric sciences
ISSN 2045-7979
Aim and Scope
URL https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/epidemiology-and-psychiatric-sciences
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (25 total)

2020
Association of depression and diabetes complications and mortality: a population-based cohort study.
Wu, C-S;Hsu, L-Y;Wang, S-H;
Vol. 29 , pp. e96
311 views DOI Abstract
2014
biodegradation of cyanide using serratia sp. isolated from contaminated soil of gold mine in takab
;Mojtaba Mohseni;Sajad Firuzyar
Vol. 3 , No. 10 , pp. 75-86
305 views Abstract
2016
cloning of affecting pyruvate decarboxylase gene in the production bioethanol of agricultural waste in the e.coli bacteria
;Masome Zeinali;Bahman Hosseini;Soodabeh Jahanbakhsh;Mahmod Rezazadeh bari;Meisam Tabatabaee
Vol. 5 , No. 18 , pp. 11-28
288 views Abstract
2015
the study of synergistic effects of n.butanolic cyclamen coum extract and ciprofloxacin on inhibition of pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm formation
;ahya abdi ali;morvarid shafiei;fereshteh shahcheraghi;azra saboora;Tooba Ghazanfari
Vol. 3 , No. 12 , pp. 25-32
284 views Abstract
2016
optimizations of α-amylase production by response surface methodology in immobilization bacillus amyloliquefaciens atcc 23350
;Hamid reza Samadlouie;Maryam Karimiroozbahani;Hami kaboosi;Naser Farrokhi
Vol. 4 , No. 16 , pp. 77-86
279 views Abstract
2019
Mental health care utilisation among internally displaced persons in Ukraine: Results from a nation-wide survey
Roberts, B.
Vol. 28 , pp. 100-111
268 views DOI
2014
isolation and characterization of fenitrothion-degrading bacteria from pestachio gardens in kerman provinance
;Mehrnosh Ghafari;Mehdi Hassanshahian;Mohammad Mahani
Vol. 3 , No. 10 , pp. 51-64
266 views Abstract
2020
Transitioning youth to adult age also through health services.
Bonati, Maurizio;
Vol. 29 , pp. e88
240 views DOI
2016
gene sequencing, cloning, and expression of the recombinant l- asparaginase of pseudomonas aeruginosa sn4 strain in escherichia coli
;Arastoo Badoei-dalfard;Zahra Karami;Narjes Ramezani-pour
Vol. 4 , No. 16 , pp. 11-20
240 views Abstract
2014
optimization of α-amylase production by bacillus amyloliquefaciens using response surfaces methodology
;Hami Kaboosi;Naimeh Tabari ;Hamid Reza Samadlouie
Vol. 3 , No. 11 , pp. 79-90
238 views Abstract
View All 25 Articles
43
Overall
Below Average
30
50
30
40
33
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

42.9/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.4/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

50.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

32.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.