Indexed in Journament

European Journal of Therapeutics

ISSN 2564-7040· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
40.4 / 100
Journament Score
Below Average
Ranked #1,269 of 29,298 scored journals (34,012 indexed)
18 Articles
Scores higher than 95.6% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

European Journal of Therapeutics (Eur J Ther) is the double-blind peer-reviewed, open-access, international publication organ of the Gaziantep University School of Medicine. The journal is a quarterly publication, published on March, June, September, and December and its publication language is English. European Journal of Therapeutics will be published bi-monthly, commencing in 2024 (February, April, June, August, October and December). European Journal of Therapeutics aims to contribute to the international literature by publishing original clinical and experimental research articles, short communication, review articles, technical notes, and letters to the editor in the fields of medical sciences. The journal’s target audience includes researchers, physicians and healthcare professionals who are interested or working in in all medical disciplines. The editorial and publication processes of the journal are shaped in accordance with the guidelines of the International Council of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE), the World Association of Medical Editors (WAME), the Council of Science Editors (CSE), the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE), the European Association of Science Editors (EASE), and National Information Standards Organization (NISO). The journal conforms to the Principles of Transparency and Best Practice in Scholarly Publishing (doaj.org/bestpractice). Originality, high scientific quality, and citation potential are the most important criteria for a manuscript to be accepted for publication. Manuscripts submitted for evaluation should not have been previously presented or already published in an electronic or printed medium. The journal should be informed of manuscripts that have been submitted to another journal for evaluation and rejected for publication. The submission of previous reviewer reports will expedite the evaluation process. Manuscripts that have been presented in a meeting should be submitted with detailed information on the organization, including the name, date, and location of the organization. Manuscripts submitted to the European Journal of Therapeutics will go through a double-blind peer-review process. Each submission will be reviewed by at least two external, independent peer reviewers who are experts in their fields in order to ensure an unbiased evaluation process. The editorial board will invite an external and independent editor to manage the evaluation processes of manuscripts submitted by editors or by the editorial board members of the journal. The Editor in Chief is the final authority in the decision-making process for all submissions.
Short Name European Journal of Therapeutics
Abbreviated Name Eur J Ther
ISSN 2564-7040
URL https://eurjther.com/
Author Instructions https://eurjther.com/index.php/home/about/submissions

Quality Profile

6 of 12 dimensions measured
Engagement 30.9
Accessibility 30.0
Timeliness 20.0
Innovation 70.0
Community Impact 5.0
Content Distribution 79.6
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

6 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left out entirely rather than plotted as zero, and with 6 dimensions measured there is not enough of a profile to draw as a shape.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for European Journal of Therapeutics
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.9 30.4
Accessibility 30.0 22.5
Timeliness 20.0 3.0
Diversity 22.7
Innovation 70.0 24.1
Community Impact 5.0 4.2
Content Distribution 79.6 88.7
Content Quality 55.5
Ethics & Transparency 40.2
Editorial Standards 33.4
Publication Regularity 53.2
Geographic Reach 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (18)

2023
Anti-phospholipase A2 Receptor Antibody Measurement in Patients with Idiopathic Membranous Nephropathy Diagnosed by Renal Biopsy
Vol. 29 , No. 2 , pp. 116-122
235 views DOI Abstract
2023
Correlation of Diffusion-weighted MR imaging and FDG PET/CT in the Diagnosis of Metastatic Lymph Nodes of Head and Neck Malignant Tumors
Vol. 29 , No. 2 , pp. 135-142
222 views DOI Abstract
2023
The Impact of Using Technological Devices on Mental and Physical Health in Adolescents
Vol. 29 , No. 2 , pp. 194-200
221 views DOI Abstract
2023
Determination of Reference Intervals of Biochemistry Parameters in healthy individuals in Gaziantep Province
Vol. 29 , No. 2 , pp. 173-178
218 views DOI Abstract
2023
Evaluation of the Readability of Turkish Online Resources Related to Laryngeal Cancer
Vol. 29 , No. 2 , pp. 168-172
204 views DOI Abstract
2023
Evaluation of the Image Quality of Ultra-Low-Dose Paranasal Sinus Computed Tomography Scans
Vol. 29 , No. 2 , pp. 143-148
199 views DOI Abstract
2023
Neutrophil-Lymphocyte Ratio, Monocyte-Lymphocyte Ratio and Platelet-Lymphocyte Ratio in Manic Episode Patients with Bipolar Disorder:
Vol. 29 , No. 2 , pp. 110-115
193 views DOI Abstract
2023
Evaluation of Errors Encountered in Photogrammetric Studies on Lower Extremities
Vol. 29 , No. 2 , pp. 155-162
191 views DOI Abstract
2023
The Effect of Forced Exercise on Striatal and Serum Serotonin Levels in a Parkinson’s Mouse Model
Vol. 29 , No. 2 , pp. 179-187
184 views DOI Abstract
2023
The Preventative Knowledge and Experience of Anesthesiology Students with C-arm Fluoroscopy
Vol. 29 , No. 2 , pp. 201-207
179 views DOI Abstract
2023
The First Impact Factor of the European Journal of Therapeutics
Vol. 29 , No. 3 , pp. e10-e11
114 views DOI Abstract
2023
The Preventative Knowledge and Experience of Anesthesiology Students with C-arm Fluoroscopy
Vol. 29 , No. 2 , pp. 201-207
179 views DOI Abstract
2023
The Impact of Using Technological Devices on Mental and Physical Health in Adolescents
Vol. 29 , No. 2 , pp. 194-200
221 views DOI Abstract
2023
Bibliometric Analysis of the Published Studies on the Kindling Model between 1980 and 2023
Vol. 29 , No. 2 , pp. 188-193
171 views DOI Abstract
2023
The Effect of Forced Exercise on Striatal and Serum Serotonin Levels in a Parkinson’s Mouse Model
Vol. 29 , No. 2 , pp. 179-187
184 views DOI Abstract
2023
Determination of Reference Intervals of Biochemistry Parameters in healthy individuals in Gaziantep Province
Vol. 29 , No. 2 , pp. 173-178
218 views DOI Abstract
2023
Evaluation of the Readability of Turkish Online Resources Related to Laryngeal Cancer
Vol. 29 , No. 2 , pp. 168-172
204 views DOI Abstract
2023
Analysis of the Nutrient Foramen in Human Dry Ulnae of Turkish Population: An Anatomical Study and Current Literature Review
Vol. 29 , No. 2 , pp. 163-167
112 views DOI Abstract
2023
Evaluation of Errors Encountered in Photogrammetric Studies on Lower Extremities
Vol. 29 , No. 2 , pp. 155-162
191 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
40.4/100 · Below Average
Ranked #1,269 of 29,298 scored
(34,012 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

40.4/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.9/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

30.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

5.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

20.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

79.6/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.