Indexed in Journament

conflict and health

ISSN 1752-1505· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
41.6 / 100
Journament Score
Below Average
Ranked #2,991 of 29,324 scored journals (34,008 indexed)
20 Articles
Scores higher than 89.8% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name confl health
Abbreviated Name confl health
ISSN 1752-1505
URL https://link.springer.com/journal/13031

Quality Profile

7 of 12 dimensions measured
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

5 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left as gaps in the shape rather than plotted as zero.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for conflict and health
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.4 30.4
Accessibility 20.0 19.1
Timeliness 0.0 9.2
Diversity 77.8 25.8
Innovation 70.0 27.4
Community Impact 13.6 7.8
Content Distribution 68.1 88.6
Content Quality 55.5
Ethics & Transparency 40.2
Editorial Standards 33.4
Publication Regularity 53.2
Geographic Reach 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (20)

2011
Vulnerability to high risk sexual behaviour (HRSB) following exposure to war trauma as seen in post-conflict communities in eastern uganda: a qualitative study
Vol. 5 , No. 1 , pp. 22-
599 views Abstract
2020
A validation study of the Zanmi Lasante Depression Symptom Inventory (ZLDSI) in a school-based study population of transitional age youth in Haiti.
Vol. 14 , pp. 13
490 views DOI Abstract
2019
Essential newborn care practice at four primary health facilities in conflict affected areas of Bossaso, Somalia: a cross-sectional study.
Vol. 13 , pp. 27
459 views DOI Abstract
2016
The peacebuilding potential of healthcare training programs.
Vol. 10 , No. 1 , pp. 29
457 views DOI Abstract
2011
Resilience of refugees displaced in the developing world: a qualitative analysis of strengths and struggles of urban refugees in Nepal.
Vol. 5 , No. 1 , pp. 20
433 views DOI Abstract
2019
Dua Ti Dawa Ti understanding psychological distress in the ten districts of the Kashmir Valley and community mental health service needs.
Vol. 13 , pp. 59
423 views DOI Abstract
2019
Developing an integrated intervention to address intimate partner violence and psychological distress in Congolese refugee women in Tanzania
Vol. 13 , No. 1 , pp. 1-16
401 views Abstract
2019
Reproductive health in humanitarian settings in Lebanon and Iraq: results from four cross-sectional studies, 2014-2015.
Vol. 13 , pp. 24
398 views DOI Abstract
2019
2020
A validation study of the Zanmi Lasante Depression Symptom Inventory (ZLDSI) in a school-based study population of transitional age youth in Haiti.
Vol. 14 , pp. 13
490 views DOI Abstract
2019
2019
Developing an integrated intervention to address intimate partner violence and psychological distress in Congolese refugee women in Tanzania
Vol. 13 , No. 1 , pp. 1-16
401 views Abstract
2019
Dua Ti Dawa Ti understanding psychological distress in the ten districts of the Kashmir Valley and community mental health service needs.
Vol. 13 , pp. 59
423 views DOI Abstract
2019
Qualitative evidence of crimes against humanity: the August 2017 attacks on the Rohingya in northern Rakhine State, Myanmar.
Vol. 13 , pp. 41
352 views DOI Abstract
2019
Informal healthcare provision in Lebanon: an adaptive mechanism among displaced Syrian health professionals in a protracted crisis.
Vol. 13 , pp. 40
333 views DOI Abstract
2019
Reproductive health in humanitarian settings in Lebanon and Iraq: results from four cross-sectional studies, 2014-2015.
Vol. 13 , pp. 24
398 views DOI Abstract
2019
Essential newborn care practice at four primary health facilities in conflict affected areas of Bossaso, Somalia: a cross-sectional study.
Vol. 13 , pp. 27
459 views DOI Abstract
2019
High levels of mortality, exposure to violence and psychological distress experienced by the internally displaced population of Ein Issa camp prior to and during their displacement in Northeast Syria, November 2017.
Vol. 13 , pp. 33
385 views DOI Abstract
2018
indikasi penyimpangan laporan keuangan akademik universitas xyz menggunakan algoritma greedy dan k-means
Vol. 2 , No. 1 , pp. 301-306
218 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
41.6/100 · Below Average
Ranked #2,991 of 29,324 scored
(34,008 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

41.6/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.4/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

77.8/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

13.6/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

68.1/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.