cell stress & chaperones | Journament

Journal Ranking

#5766 / 33,981
📉 Poor
Overall Score
39.6/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
30
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
32
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 1 month ago

cell stress & chaperones

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Certificate of Indexing
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
ulakbim sci
Short Name cell stress chaperones
Abbreviated Name cell stress chaperones
ISSN 1466-1268
Aim and Scope
URL https://www.springer.com/journal/12192
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (30 total)

2019
kutuplaştırılmış veri üzerinde ikili sınıflandırma için sürekli zamanlı eşik değeri belirleme
;Ali SAĞLAM;Nurdan AKHAN BAYKAN
Vol. 25 , No. 5 , pp. 596-602
294 views Abstract
2015
the microstructure and hardness properties analysis of welded aluminum matrix material reinforced with sic using different currents and forms of welding
;Arzum Ulukoy;Volkan Onar;Yavuz Kaplan
Vol. 21 , No. 8 , pp. 365-370
292 views Abstract
2019
Structural properties and cellular expression of AfrLEA6, a group 6 late embryogenesis abundant protein from embryos of Artemia franciscana.
LeBlanc, Blase M;Le, Mike T;Janis, Brett;Menze, Michael A;Hand, Steven C;
275 views DOI Abstract
2017
domates çekirdeği ilave edilerek üretilen krakerlerin bazı kimyasal, fiziksel ve duyusal özellikleri
;Fatma IŞIK;Cansu TOPKAYA
Vol. 23 , No. 7 , pp. 926-932
271 views Abstract
2018
kent içi otobüs memnuniyet anketi verileri ve faktör analizinden yararlanılarak otobüslerin hizmet kalitesinin modellenmesi: İett örneği
;İlgın GÖKAŞAR;Büşra BURAN;Selim DÜNDAR
Vol. 24 , No. 6 , pp. 1079-1086
265 views Abstract
2015
importance of decision support systems about food safety in raw milk production
;Ecem Akan;Özer Kınık
Vol. 21 , No. 7 , pp. 319-324
254 views Abstract
2011
kültürel miras için zenginleştirilmiş gerçeklik uygulamaları
;Erkan Bostancı
Vol. 17 , No. 3 , pp. 133-142
251 views Abstract
1998
solution of nonlinear problems in water resources systems by genetic algorithm
;Ahmet BAYLAR;Mualla ÖZTÜRK;Abdussamet ARSLAN
Vol. 4 , No. 3 , pp. 777-785
251 views Abstract
2005
optimal-tuning of pid controller gains using genetic algorithms
;Ömer GÜNDOĞDU
Vol. 11 , No. 1 , pp. 131-135
233 views Abstract
2010
the passive cable modeling and simulating of the axon with matlab7.0.4/simulink
;Özlem COŞKUN;Mesud KAHRİMAN;Selçuk ÇÖMLEKÇİ;Suat ÖZKORUCUKLU
Vol. 16 , No. 3 , pp. 283-289
202 views Abstract
View All 30 Articles
40
Overall
Poor
30
35
30
40
32
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

39.6/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.3/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

32.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.