Indexed in Journament

cell stress & chaperones

ISSN 1466-1268· EN

Journal Website Certificate of Indexing
Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
25.0 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #26,817 of 29,298 scored journals (34,012 indexed)
30 Articles
Scores higher than 8.4% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name cell stress chaperones
Abbreviated Name cell stress chaperones
ISSN 1466-1268
URL https://www.springer.com/journal/12192

Quality Profile

7 of 12 dimensions measured
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

5 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left as gaps in the shape rather than plotted as zero.

Show the numbers
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.8 30.4
Accessibility 20.0 22.5
Timeliness 0.0 3.0
Diversity 5.6 22.7
Innovation 45.0 24.1
Community Impact 4.3 4.2
Content Distribution 63.2 88.7
Content Quality — 55.5
Ethics & Transparency — 40.2
Editorial Standards — 33.4
Publication Regularity — 53.2
Geographic Reach — 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (30)

2019
kutuplaştırılmış veri üzerinde ikili sınıflandırma için sürekli zamanlı eşik değeri belirleme
;Ali SAĞLAM;Nurdan AKHAN BAYKAN
Vol. 25 , No. 5 , pp. 596-602
327 views Abstract
2015
the microstructure and hardness properties analysis of welded aluminum matrix material reinforced with sic using different currents and forms of welding
;Arzum Ulukoy;Volkan Onar;Yavuz Kaplan
Vol. 21 , No. 8 , pp. 365-370
324 views Abstract
2017
domates çekirdeği ilave edilerek üretilen krakerlerin bazı kimyasal, fiziksel ve duyusal özellikleri
;Fatma IŞIK;Cansu TOPKAYA
Vol. 23 , No. 7 , pp. 926-932
319 views Abstract
2019
Structural properties and cellular expression of AfrLEA6, a group 6 late embryogenesis abundant protein from embryos of Artemia franciscana.
LeBlanc, Blase M;Le, Mike T;Janis, Brett;Menze, Michael A;Hand, Steven C;
312 views DOI Abstract
2018
kent içi otobüs memnuniyet anketi verileri ve faktör analizinden yararlanılarak otobüslerin hizmet kalitesinin modellenmesi: İett örneği
;İlgın GÖKAŞAR;Büşra BURAN;Selim DÜNDAR
Vol. 24 , No. 6 , pp. 1079-1086
296 views Abstract
2011
kültürel miras için zenginleştirilmiş gerçeklik uygulamaları
;Erkan Bostancı
Vol. 17 , No. 3 , pp. 133-142
286 views Abstract
1998
solution of nonlinear problems in water resources systems by genetic algorithm
;Ahmet BAYLAR;Mualla ÖZTÜRK;Abdussamet ARSLAN
Vol. 4 , No. 3 , pp. 777-785
282 views Abstract
2015
importance of decision support systems about food safety in raw milk production
;Ecem Akan;Özer Kınık
Vol. 21 , No. 7 , pp. 319-324
272 views Abstract
2005
optimal-tuning of pid controller gains using genetic algorithms
;Ömer GÜNDOĞDU
Vol. 11 , No. 1 , pp. 131-135
253 views Abstract
2010
the passive cable modeling and simulating of the axon with matlab7.0.4/simulink
;Özlem COŞKUN;Mesud KAHRİMAN;Selçuk ÇÖMLEKÇİ;Suat ÖZKORUCUKLU
Vol. 16 , No. 3 , pp. 283-289
222 views Abstract
2019
kutuplaştırılmış veri üzerinde ikili sınıflandırma için sürekli zamanlı eşik değeri belirleme
;Ali SAĞLAM;Nurdan AKHAN BAYKAN
Vol. 25 , No. 5 , pp. 596-602
327 views Abstract
2019
Structural properties and cellular expression of AfrLEA6, a group 6 late embryogenesis abundant protein from embryos of Artemia franciscana.
LeBlanc, Blase M;Le, Mike T;Janis, Brett;Menze, Michael A;Hand, Steven C;
312 views DOI Abstract
2018
kent içi otobüs memnuniyet anketi verileri ve faktör analizinden yararlanılarak otobüslerin hizmet kalitesinin modellenmesi: İett örneği
;İlgın GÖKAŞAR;Büşra BURAN;Selim DÜNDAR
Vol. 24 , No. 6 , pp. 1079-1086
296 views Abstract
2018
elastik zemin üzerine oturan tabakalı kompozit silindirik kabukların zorlanmış titreşim analizi üzerine eğriliğin etkisi
;Ali DOĞAN
Vol. 24 , No. 6 , pp. 960-966
195 views Abstract
2017
domates çekirdeği ilave edilerek üretilen krakerlerin bazı kimyasal, fiziksel ve duyusal özellikleri
;Fatma IŞIK;Cansu TOPKAYA
Vol. 23 , No. 7 , pp. 926-932
319 views Abstract
2016
optimal bidding in turkey day ahead electricity market for wind energy and pumped storage hydro power plant
;Ceyhun Yıldız;Mustafa Şekkeli
Vol. 22 , No. 5 , pp. 361-366
140 views Abstract
2016
an ontology based approach in health information systems: blood test ontology example
;Emine Sezer;Özgü Can;Okan Bursa;Murat Osman Ünalır
Vol. 22 , No. 5 , pp. 367-375
189 views Abstract
2016
new prediction methods for collaborative filtering
;Hasan BULUT;Musa MİLLİ
Vol. 22 , No. 2 , pp. 123-128
185 views Abstract
2015
the role of mass transfer in membrane systems
;Levent Gürel;Hanife Büyükgüngör
Vol. 21 , No. 6 , pp. 224-238
107 views Abstract
2015
importance of decision support systems about food safety in raw milk production
;Ecem Akan;Özer Kınık
Vol. 21 , No. 7 , pp. 319-324
272 views Abstract
Journament Score
25.0/100 · Poor
Ranked #26,817 of 29,298 scored
(34,012 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.
Journament

Overall Quality Score

25.0/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.8/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

5.6/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

45.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

4.3/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

63.2/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.