Indexed in Journament

transplant infectious disease : an official journal of the transplantation society

ISSN 1399-3062· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
32.7 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #12,058 of 29,297 scored journals (34,026 indexed)
39 Articles
Scores higher than 58.8% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Nombre Corto transpl infect dis
Nombre Abreviado transpl infect dis
ISSN 1399-3062
URL https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/13993062

Quality Profile

7 of 12 dimensions measured
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

5 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left as gaps in the shape rather than plotted as zero.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for transplant infectious disease : an official journal of the transplantation society
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 31.2 30.5
Accessibility 20.0 23.0
Timeliness 0.0 3.0
Diversity 22.2 25.9
Innovation 70.0 24.1
Community Impact 5.0 5.7
Content Distribution 73.2 89.4
Content Quality — 55.1
Ethics & Transparency — 40.5
Editorial Standards — 33.0
Publication Regularity — 52.9
Geographic Reach — 30.4

Publications Per Year

Articles (39)

2019
Why do lung transplant patients discontinue triazole prophylaxis?
Vol. 21 , No. 3 , pp. e13067
438 views DOI Abstract
2016
endothelial function assessed by peripheral arterial tonometry is not related to cardiovascular risk score in healthy subjects
Vol. 9 , pp. 21-26
415 views DOI Abstract
2020
Coinfection of Mycobacterium malmoense and Mycobacterium chimaera in a kidney transplant recipient: a case report and review of the literature.
, pp. e13241
386 views DOI Abstract
2017
Esophageal tuberculosis with coexisting opportunistic infections in a renal allograft transplant recipient.
Vol. 19 , No. 1
367 views DOI Abstract
2016
rarity of heart failure in a traditional african population; a rural community based study
Vol. 8 , pp. 38-40
364 views DOI Abstract
2019
Bacteremias following autologous stem cell transplantation for multiple myeloma: Risk factors and outcomes.
Vol. 21 , No. 2 , pp. e13052
340 views DOI Abstract
2015
bartonella henselae endocarditis: a serological dilemma
Vol. 4 , pp. 69-70
340 views DOI Abstract
2016
spiral flow tube for contrast medium reduction in coronary ct angiography
Vol. 9 , pp. 15-20
301 views DOI Abstract
2016
graves induced reversible lvot obstruction
Vol. 8 , pp. 103-105
300 views DOI Abstract
2020
New blood-borne virus infections among organ transplant recipients: An Australian data-linked cohort study examining donor transmissions and other HIV, hepatitis C and hepatitis B notifications, 2000-2015
, pp. -
197 views Abstract
2020
Prospective assessment of Clostridioides (formerly Clostridium) difficile colonization and acquisition in hematopoietic stem cell transplant patients
, pp. -
205 views Abstract
2020
A case-control study to assess the role of polyomavirus in transplant complications: Where do we stand?
, pp. -
179 views Abstract
2020
A Case of Successful Treatment of Severe COVID-19 Pneumonia with Favipiravir and Tocilizumab in Post-kidney Transplant Recipient.
, pp. e13388
236 views DOI Abstract
2020
Coinfection of Mycobacterium malmoense and Mycobacterium chimaera in a kidney transplant recipient: a case report and review of the literature.
, pp. e13241
386 views DOI Abstract
2019
Bacteremias following autologous stem cell transplantation for multiple myeloma: Risk factors and outcomes.
Vol. 21 , No. 2 , pp. e13052
340 views DOI Abstract
2019
Why do lung transplant patients discontinue triazole prophylaxis?
Vol. 21 , No. 3 , pp. e13067
438 views DOI Abstract
2017
mortality and co-morbidities among hospitalised hypertensives in nigeria
Vol. 11 , pp. 37-42
264 views DOI Abstract
2017
estimation of risk factors for cardiogenic shock in takotsubo cardiomyopathy: a retrospective study
Vol. 11 , pp. 49-54
203 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
32.7/100 · Poor
Ranked #12,058 of 29,297 scored
(34,026 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

32.7/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

31.2/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

22.2/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

5.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

73.2/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.