transplant infectious disease : an official journal of the transplantation society | Journament

Journal Ranking

#246 / 33,897
📉 Poor
Overall Score
39.0/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
35
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 20 saat önce

transplant infectious disease : an official journal of the transplantation society

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indekslemeler
ncbi
Kisa Ad transpl infect dis
Kisaltilmis Ad transpl infect dis
ISSN 1399-3062
Amac ve Kapsam
URL
Yazar Talimatlari

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (39 total)

2019
Successful eradication of chronic symptomatic Candida krusei urinary tract infection with increased dose micafungin in a liver and kidney transplant recipient: Case report and review of the literature.
Multani, Ashrit;Subramanian, Aruna K;Liu, Anne Y;
, pp. e13118
387 views DOI Abstract
2019
Why do lung transplant patients discontinue triazole prophylaxis?
Pennington, Kelly M;Razonable, Raymund R;Peters, Steve;Scott, John P;Wylam, Mark;Daly, Richard C;Kennedy, Cassie C;
Vol. 21 , No. 3 , pp. e13067
343 views DOI Abstract
2020
Coinfection of Mycobacterium malmoense and Mycobacterium chimaera in a kidney transplant recipient: a case report and review of the literature.
Maalouly, Christian;Devresse, Arnaud;Martin, Anandi;Rodriguez-Villalobos, Hector;Kanaan, Nada;Belkhir, Leïla;
, pp. e13241
287 views DOI Abstract
2016
rarity of heart failure in a traditional african population; a rural community based study
;Basil N. Okeahialam;Hadiza A. Agbo;Chikaike Ogbonna;Evelyn K. Chuhwak;Ikechukwu O.Isiguzoro
Vol. 8 , pp. 38-40
285 views DOI Abstract
2016
endothelial function assessed by peripheral arterial tonometry is not related to cardiovascular risk score in healthy subjects
;Ylfa Run Sigurdardottir;Bylgja Run Stefansdottir;Thor Aspelund;Gudmundur Thorgeirsson;Linda Bjork Kristinsdottir;Vilmundur Gudnason;Karl Andersen
Vol. 9 , pp. 21-26
282 views DOI Abstract
2019
Bacteremias following autologous stem cell transplantation for multiple myeloma: Risk factors and outcomes.
Mohan, Meera;Susanibar-Adaniya, Sandra;Buros, Amy;Crescencio, Juan Carlos Rico;Burgess, Mary J;Lusardi, Katherine;Davies, Faith;Morgan, Gareth;Vanrhee, Frits;Zangari, Maurizio;Schinke, Carolina;Thanendrarajan, Sharmilan;Kothari, Atul;
Vol. 21 , No. 2 , pp. e13052
269 views DOI Abstract
2017
Esophageal tuberculosis with coexisting opportunistic infections in a renal allograft transplant recipient.
Kumar, Sunil;Minz, Mukut;Sinha, Saroj K;Vaiphei, Kim;Sharma, Ashish;Singh, Sarbpreet;Kenwar, Deepesh B;
Vol. 19 , No. 1
261 views DOI Abstract
2015
bartonella henselae endocarditis: a serological dilemma
;Yashwant Agrawal;Ronald Ross;Jagadeesh K Kalavakunta
Vol. 4 , pp. 69-70
261 views DOI Abstract
2013
echocardiographic evaluation of cardiac function response to removal of aortic stenosis: surgical and trans-catheter aortic valve implantation (tavi)
;Ying Zhao;Yi-hua He
Vol. 1 , No. 1 , pp. 16-18
227 views DOI Abstract
2017
approach to the treatment of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction and mid-range ejection fraction
;Ewa A Jankowska;Andrew JS Coats;Stefan D Anker
Vol. 10 , pp. 34-36
222 views DOI Abstract
View All 39 Articles
39
Overall
Poor
31
15
30
40
35
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

39.0/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.8/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

35.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.