Postgraduate Medical Journal | Journament

Journal Ranking

#2822 / 33,953
📉 Poor
Overall Score
38.0/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
30
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
34
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 4 days ago

Postgraduate Medical Journal

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
ncbi ulakbim sci
Short Name Postgraduate Medical Journal
Abbreviated Name postgrad med j
ISSN 1469-0756
Aim and Scope
URL http://pmj.bmj.com
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (22 total)

2019
Osler Centenary Papers: Would Sir William Osler be a role model for medical trainees and physicians today?
Murthy, Vivek K;Wright, Scott M;
Vol. 95 , No. 1130 , pp. 664-668
371 views DOI Abstract
1991
Recurrent bacterial meningitis occurring five years after closed head injury and caused by an intranasal post-traumatic meningo-encephalocele
Giunta G;Piazza I;;
Vol. 67 , No. 786 , pp. -
350 views Abstract
2003
Effects of diltiazem on platelet activation and cytosolic calcium during percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty.
Dai, H;Chen, J;Tao, Q;Zhu, J;Zhang, F;Zheng, L;Qiu, Y;
Vol. 79 , No. 935 , pp. 522-6
347 views Abstract
2018
Childbearing and maternity leave in residency: determinants and well-being outcomes.
Stack, Shobha W;McKinney, Christy M;Spiekerman, Charles;Best, Jennifer A;
Vol. 94 , No. 1118 , pp. 694-699
338 views DOI Abstract
2017
A mixed method, multiperspective evaluation of a near peer teaching programme.
Lydon, Sinéad;O'Connor, Paul;Mongan, Orla;Gorecka, Miroslawa;McVicker, Lyle;Stankard, Aiden;Byrne, Dara;
Vol. 93 , No. 1103 , pp. 541-548
301 views DOI Abstract
2020
The role of community pharmacists and their position in the delivery of diabetes care: an update for medical professionals.
Brewster, Sarah;Holt, Richard;Portlock, Jane;Price, Hermione;
245 views DOI Abstract
1990
Practical principles of medical audit
Dixon N;;
Vol. 66 Suppl 3 , pp. -
239 views Abstract
2017
aplikasi pengenalan ikan hias predator air tawar menggunakan teknologi augmented reality berbasis android
;Jimmy Moedjahedy;Ardy Bokang;Arthur Raranta
Vol. 3 , No. 1 , pp. 91-99
231 views Abstract
2019
Stop paying through the nose: student and trainee medical conferences offer better value for money than professional alternatives.
Sharp, Elliott W;Curlewis, Keegan;Clarke, Thomas H S;
223 views DOI Abstract
2020
Hydroxychloroquine and covid-19.
Sinha, Neeraj;Balayla, Galit;
215 views DOI Abstract
View All 22 Articles
38
Overall
Poor
30
35
30
40
34
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

38.0/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.5/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

34.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.