Indexed in Journament

Physica medica : PM : an international journal devoted to the applications of physics to medicine and biology : official journal of the Italian Association of Biomedical Physics (AIFB)

ISSN 1724-191X· EN

Journal Website Certificate of Indexing
Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
35.9 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #6,644 of 29,297 scored journals (34,015 indexed)
25 Articles
Scores higher than 77.3% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name Phys Med
Abbreviated Name phys med
ISSN 1724-191X
URL https://www.journals.elsevier.com/physica-medica

Quality Profile

6 of 12 dimensions measured
Engagement 30.7
Accessibility 20.0
Timeliness 0.0
Innovation 70.0
Community Impact 11.4
Content Distribution 76.1
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

6 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left out entirely rather than plotted as zero, and with 6 dimensions measured there is not enough of a profile to draw as a shape.

Show the numbers
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.7 30.4
Accessibility 20.0 23.1
Timeliness 0.0 3.0
Diversity — 26.4
Innovation 70.0 24.1
Community Impact 11.4 4.4
Content Distribution 76.1 89.3
Content Quality — 55.1
Ethics & Transparency — 40.5
Editorial Standards — 33.0
Publication Regularity — 52.9
Geographic Reach — 30.4

Publications Per Year

Articles (25)

2016
the effectiveness of reengineering moheb project to improve knowledge, attitude, and performance of individuals & local communities in response to earthquake: a case study
;Hamidreza Eskash;Morteza Moradipour;Mina Nazari Kamal;Sheida Sarafzade;Mahboobeh Rouhollahi;Abdoreza Arghaii;Rahele Samouei
Vol. 1 , No. 4 , pp. 193-199
572 views Abstract
2019
Calculation of k factors for Farmer-type ionization chambers following the recent recommendations on new key dosimetry data.
Pimpinella, Maria;Silvi, Luca;Pinto, Massimo;
Vol. 57 , pp. 221-230
465 views DOI Abstract
2018
Clinical implementations of 4D pencil beam scanned particle therapy: Report on the 4D treatment planning workshop 2016 and 2017.
Trnková, Petra;Knäusl, Barbara;Actis, Oxana;Bert, Christoph;Biegun, Aleksandra K;Boehlen, Till T;Furtado, Hugo;McClelland, Jamie;Mori, Shinichiro;Rinaldi, Ilaria;Rucinski, Antoni;Knopf, Antje C;
Vol. 54 , pp. 121-130
433 views DOI Abstract
2019
3D Monte Carlo dosimetry of intraoperative electron radiation therapy (IOERT).
Alhamada, Husein;Simon, Stephane;Philippson, Catherine;Vandekerkhove, Christophe;Jourani, Younes;Pauly, Nicolas;VanGestel, Dirk;Reynaert, Nick;
Vol. 57 , pp. 207-214
426 views DOI Abstract
2019
Enhancement of linear energy transfer in gold nanoparticles mediated radiation therapy.
Gadoue, Sherif M;Toomeh, Dolla;
Vol. 60 , pp. 22-29
423 views DOI Abstract
2019
Computer-aided diagnosis of congestive heart failure using ECG signals - A review.
Jahmunah, V;Oh, Shu Lih;Wei, Joel Koh En;Ciaccio, Edward J;Chua, Kuang;San, Tan Ru;Acharya, U Rajendra;
Vol. 62 , pp. 95-104
420 views DOI Abstract
2019
Film dosimetry studies for patient specific quality assurance in microbeam radiation therapy.
Ocadiz, Alexandre;Livingstone, Jayde;Donzelli, Mattia;Bartzsch, Stefan;Nemoz, Christian;Kefs, Samy;Pellicioli, Paolo;Giraud, Jean-Yves;Balosso, Jacques;Krisch, Michael;Bräuer-Krisch, Elke;Serduc, Raphaël;Adam, Jean-François;
Vol. 65 , pp. 227-237
409 views DOI Abstract
2020
A quantitative evaluation of deformable image registration based on MV cone beam CT images: Impact of deformation magnitudes and image modalities.
Huang, Yuliang;Li, Chenguang;Wang, Haiyang;Hu, Qiaoqiao;Wang, Ruoxi;Chang, Cheng;Ma, Wenjun;Li, Weibo;Wu, Hao;Zhang, Yibao;
Vol. 71 , pp. 82-87
405 views DOI Abstract
2019
Comparison of two beam angular optimization algorithms guided by automated multicriterial IMRT.
Ventura, Tiago;Rocha, Humberto;da Costa Ferreira, Brigida;Dias, Joana;Lopes, Maria do Carmo;
Vol. 64 , pp. 210-221
394 views DOI Abstract
2020
Intercomparison of dose enhancement ratio and secondary electron spectra for gold nanoparticles irradiated by X-rays calculated using multiple Monte Carlo simulation codes.
Li, W B;Belchior, A;Beuve, M;Chen, Y Z;Di Maria, S;Friedland, W;Gervais, B;Heide, B;Hocine, N;Ipatov, A;Klapproth, A P;Li, C Y;Li, J L;Multhoff, G;Poignant, F;Qiu, R;Rabus, H;Rudek, B;Schuemann, J;Stangl, S;Testa, E;Villagrasa, C;Xie, W Z;Zhang, Y B;
Vol. 69 , pp. 147-163
372 views DOI Abstract
2020
Beamline characterization of a dielectric-filled reentrant cavity resonator as beam current monitor for a medical cyclotron facility.
Srinivasan, Sudharsan;Duperrex, Pierre-André;Schippers, Jacobus Maarten;
Vol. 78 , pp. 101-108
266 views DOI Abstract
2020
Machine learning in quantitative PET: A review of attenuation correction and low-count image reconstruction methods.
Wang, Tonghe;Lei, Yang;Fu, Yabo;Curran, Walter J;Liu, Tian;Nye, Jonathon A;Yang, Xiaofeng;
Vol. 76 , pp. 294-306
337 views DOI Abstract
2020
A quantitative evaluation of deformable image registration based on MV cone beam CT images: Impact of deformation magnitudes and image modalities.
Huang, Yuliang;Li, Chenguang;Wang, Haiyang;Hu, Qiaoqiao;Wang, Ruoxi;Chang, Cheng;Ma, Wenjun;Li, Weibo;Wu, Hao;Zhang, Yibao;
Vol. 71 , pp. 82-87
405 views DOI Abstract
2020
Quality indicators for hyperthermia treatment: Italian survey analysis.
Di Dia, A;Maggio, A;Gabriele, D;Cattari, G;Bresciani, S;Miranti, A;Carillo, V;D'Angelo, S;Dall'Oglio, S;Donato, V;Ferrara, T;Maluta, S;Stasi, M;Gabriele, P;
Vol. 70 , pp. 118-122
321 views DOI Abstract
2020
Intercomparison of dose enhancement ratio and secondary electron spectra for gold nanoparticles irradiated by X-rays calculated using multiple Monte Carlo simulation codes.
Li, W B;Belchior, A;Beuve, M;Chen, Y Z;Di Maria, S;Friedland, W;Gervais, B;Heide, B;Hocine, N;Ipatov, A;Klapproth, A P;Li, C Y;Li, J L;Multhoff, G;Poignant, F;Qiu, R;Rabus, H;Rudek, B;Schuemann, J;Stangl, S;Testa, E;Villagrasa, C;Xie, W Z;Zhang, Y B;
Vol. 69 , pp. 147-163
372 views DOI Abstract
2019
Enhancement of linear energy transfer in gold nanoparticles mediated radiation therapy.
Gadoue, Sherif M;Toomeh, Dolla;
Vol. 60 , pp. 22-29
423 views DOI Abstract
2019
Computer-aided diagnosis of congestive heart failure using ECG signals - A review.
Jahmunah, V;Oh, Shu Lih;Wei, Joel Koh En;Ciaccio, Edward J;Chua, Kuang;San, Tan Ru;Acharya, U Rajendra;
Vol. 62 , pp. 95-104
420 views DOI Abstract
2019
Calculation of k factors for Farmer-type ionization chambers following the recent recommendations on new key dosimetry data.
Pimpinella, Maria;Silvi, Luca;Pinto, Massimo;
Vol. 57 , pp. 221-230
465 views DOI Abstract
2019
3D Monte Carlo dosimetry of intraoperative electron radiation therapy (IOERT).
Alhamada, Husein;Simon, Stephane;Philippson, Catherine;Vandekerkhove, Christophe;Jourani, Younes;Pauly, Nicolas;VanGestel, Dirk;Reynaert, Nick;
Vol. 57 , pp. 207-214
426 views DOI Abstract
2019
Geant4 physics list comparison for the simulation of phase-contrast mammography (XPulse project).
Beaudoux, V;Blin, G;Barbrel, B;Kantor, G;Zacharatou, C;
Vol. 60 , pp. 66-75
296 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
35.9/100 · Poor
Ranked #6,644 of 29,297 scored
(34,015 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.
Journament

Overall Quality Score

35.9/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.7/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

11.4/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

76.1/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.