Indexed in Journament

american journal of transplantation

ISSN 1600-6135· EN

Journal Website Certificate of Indexing
Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
19.9 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #29,055 of 29,317 scored journals (33,995 indexed)
33 Articles
Scores higher than 0.8% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name american journal of transplantation
Abbreviated Name american journal of transplantation
ISSN 1600-6135
URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/journal/american-journal-of-transplantation

Quality Profile

7 of 12 dimensions measured
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

5 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left as gaps in the shape rather than plotted as zero.

Show the numbers
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.2 30.1
Accessibility 20.0 18.5
Timeliness 20.0 22.4
Diversity 5.6 29.3
Innovation 1.5 32.1
Community Impact 0.0 15.2
Content Distribution 53.5 88.4
Content Quality — 55.5
Ethics & Transparency — 40.2
Editorial Standards — 33.4
Publication Regularity — 53.2
Geographic Reach — 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (33)

2015
Landscape of deceased donors labeled increased risk for disease transmission under new guidelines
Kucirka, L.
Vol. 15 , pp. 3215-3223
352 views DOI
2019
Family and transplant professionals’ views of organ recovery before circulatory death for imminently dying patients: A qualitative study using semistructured interviews and focus groups
Zimmermann, C.
Vol. 19 , pp. 2232-2240
292 views DOI
2018
Mood, body image, fear of kidney failure, life satisfaction, and decisional stability following living kidney donation: Findings from the KDOC study
Rodrigue, J.
Vol. 18 , pp. 1397-1407
284 views DOI
2015
model selection and hypothesis testing for large-scale network models with overlapping groups
;Tiago P. Peixoto
Vol. 5 , No. 1 , pp. 011033-
220 views DOI Abstract
2015
complete bromide surface segregation in mixed nacl/nabr aerosols grown from droplets
;Egill Antonsson;Minna Patanen;Christophe Nicolas;John J. Neville;Safia Benkoula;Alok Goel;Catalin Miron
Vol. 5 , No. 1 , pp. 011025-
215 views DOI Abstract
2014
balanced networks of spiking neurons with spatially dependent recurrent connections
;Robert Rosenbaum;Brent Doiron
Vol. 4 , No. 2 , pp. 021039-
214 views DOI Abstract
2016
engineering sensorial delay to control phototaxis and emergent collective behaviors
;Mite Mijalkov;Austin McDaniel;Jan Wehr;Giovanni Volpe
Vol. 6 , No. 1 , pp. 011008-
200 views DOI Abstract
2016
cold-strontium laser in the superradiant crossover regime
;Matthew A. Norcia;James K. Thompson
Vol. 6 , No. 1 , pp. 011025-
190 views DOI Abstract
2016
emergent hydrodynamics in integrable quantum systems out of equilibrium
;Olalla A. Castro-Alvaredo;Benjamin Doyon;Takato Yoshimura
Vol. 6 , No. 4 , pp. 041065-
171 views DOI Abstract
2018
pseudogap and fermi-surface topology in the two-dimensional hubbard model
;Wei Wu;Mathias S. Scheurer;Shubhayu Chatterjee;Subir Sachdev;Antoine Georges;Michel Ferrero
Vol. 8 , No. 2 , pp. 021048-
168 views DOI Abstract
2024
Coronavirus disease 2019 vaccine mandates and the Owl of Minerva
Hippen, B.E.
Vol. 24 , pp. 9-10
25 views DOI
2019
Building a Braid: Patient, Transplant and Society
Pullen, L.
Vol. 19 , pp. 2395-2396
10 views DOI
2019
Family and transplant professionals’ views of organ recovery before circulatory death for imminently dying patients: A qualitative study using semistructured interviews and focus groups
Zimmermann, C.
Vol. 19 , pp. 2232-2240
292 views DOI
2018
perfect anomalous reflection with a bipartite huygens’ metasurface
;Alex M. H. Wong;George V. Eleftheriades
Vol. 8 , No. 1 , pp. 011036-
91 views DOI Abstract
2018
pseudogap and fermi-surface topology in the two-dimensional hubbard model
;Wei Wu;Mathias S. Scheurer;Shubhayu Chatterjee;Subir Sachdev;Antoine Georges;Michel Ferrero
Vol. 8 , No. 2 , pp. 021048-
168 views DOI Abstract
2018
multiferroic magnetic spirals induced by random magnetic exchanges
;Andrea Scaramucci;Hiroshi Shinaoka;Maxim V. Mostovoy;Markus Müller;Christopher Mudry;Matthias Troyer;Nicola A. Spaldin
Vol. 8 , No. 1 , pp. 011005-
139 views DOI Abstract
2018
thermalization near integrability in a dipolar quantum newton’s cradle
;Yijun Tang;Wil Kao;Kuan-Yu Li;Sangwon Seo;Krishnanand Mallayya;Marcos Rigol;Sarang Gopalakrishnan;Benjamin L. Lev
Vol. 8 , No. 2 , pp. 021030-
108 views DOI Abstract
2018
low-depth quantum simulation of materials
;Ryan Babbush;Nathan Wiebe;Jarrod McClean;James McClain;Hartmut Neven;Garnet Kin-Lic Chan
Vol. 8 , No. 1 , pp. 011044-
14 views DOI Abstract
2018
Mood, body image, fear of kidney failure, life satisfaction, and decisional stability following living kidney donation: Findings from the KDOC study
Rodrigue, J.
Vol. 18 , pp. 1397-1407
284 views DOI
2017
efficient quantum pseudorandomness with nearly time-independent hamiltonian dynamics
;Yoshifumi Nakata;Christoph Hirche;Masato Koashi;Andreas Winter
Vol. 7 , No. 2 , pp. 021006-
139 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
19.9/100 · Poor
Ranked #29,055 of 29,317 scored
(33,995 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.
Journament

Overall Quality Score

19.9/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.2/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

5.6/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

1.5/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

0.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

20.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

53.5/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.