clinical cancer research : an official journal of the american association for cancer research | Journament

Journal Ranking

#143 / 33,952
📊 Below Average
Overall Score
43.5/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
32
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 2 days ago

clinical cancer research : an official journal of the american association for cancer research

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
ncbi
Short Name clin cancer res
Abbreviated Name clin cancer res
ISSN 1078-0432
Aim and Scope
URL http://clincancerres.aacrjournals.org
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (11 total)

2019
Validation of Microsatellite Instability Detection Using a Comprehensive Plasma-Based Genotyping Panel.
Willis, Jason;Lefterova, Martina I;Artyomenko, Alexander;Kasi, Pashtoon Murtaza;Nakamura, Yoshiaki;Mody, Kabir;Catenacci, Daniel V T;Fakih, Marwan;Barbacioru, Catalin;Zhao, Jing;Sikora, Marcin;Fairclough, Stephen R;Lee, Hyuk;Kim, Kyoung-Mee;Kim, Seung Tae;Kim, Jinchul;Gavino, Danielle;Benavides, Manuel;Peled, Nir;Nguyen, Timmy;Cusnir, Mike;Eskander, Ramez N;Azzi, Georges;Yoshino, Takayuki;Banks, Kimberly C;Raymond, Victoria M;Lanman, Richard B;Chudova, Darya I;Talasaz, AmirAli;Kopetz, Scott;Lee, Jeeyun;Odegaard, Justin I;
374 views DOI Abstract
2020
Gefitinib and afatinib show potential efficacy for Fanconi anemia-related head and neck cancer.
Montanuy, Helena;Martínez-Barriocanal, Agueda;Casado, José A;Rovirosa, Llorenç;Ramírez, Maria José;Nieto, Rocio;Carrascoso-Rubio, Carlos;Riera, Pau;Gonzalez, Alan;Lerma, Enrique;Lasa, Adriana;Carreras-Puigvert, Jordi;Helleday, Thomas;Bueren, Juan A;Arango, Diego;Minguillón, Jordi;Surrallés, Jordi;
353 views DOI Abstract
2003
Beta-catenin-related anomalies in apoptosis-resistant and hormone-refractory prostate cancer cells
de la Taille A;Rubin MA;Chen MW;Vacherot F;de Medina SG;Burchardt M;Buttyan R;Chopin D;;
Vol. 9 , No. 5 , pp. -
335 views Abstract
2020
What is the real impact of estrogen receptor status on the prognosis and treatment of HER2-positive early breast cancer?
Brandão, Mariana;Caparica, Rafael;Malorni, Luca;Prat, Aleix;Carey, Lisa A;Piccart, Martine;
328 views DOI Abstract
2020
Everolimus, Letrozole, and Metformin in Women with Advanced or Recurrent Endometrioid Endometrial Cancer: A Multi-Center, Single Arm, Phase II Study
Soliman PT;Westin SN;Iglesias DA;Fellman BM;Yuan Y;Zhang Q;Yates MS;Broaddus RR;Slomovitz BM;Lu KH;Coleman RL;;
Vol. 26 , No. 3 , pp. -
327 views Abstract
2001
Classic Kaposi's sarcoma associated with human herpesvirus 8 infection in a 13-year-old male: a case report
Landau HJ;Poiesz BJ;Dube S;Bogart JA;Weiner LB;Souid AK;;
Vol. 7 , No. 8 , pp. -
323 views Abstract
2019
Long noncoding RNA forms a growth promoting complex with HNRNPL in human glioblastoma through stabilization of ACTN4 and activation of NF-κB signaling.
Ji, Jianxiong;Xu, Ran;Ding, Kaikai;Bao, Guoqing;Zhang, Xin;Huang, Bin;Wang, Xinyu;Martinez, Aurora;Wang, Xiuying;Li, Gang;Miletic, Hrvoje;Thorsen, Frits;Bjerkvig, Rolf;Xiang, Lei;Han, Bo;Chen, Anjing;Li, Xin-Gang;Wang, Jian;
316 views DOI Abstract
2019
Predicting the 1p/19q co-deletion status of presumed low grade glioma with an externally validated machine learning algorithm.
van der Voort, Sebastian R;Incekara, Fatih;Wijnenga, Maarten Mj;Kapsas, Georgios;Gardeniers, Mayke;Schouten, Joost W;Starmans, Martijn Pa;Nandoe Tewarie, Rishie;Lycklama, Geert J;French, Pim J;Dubbink, Hendrikus J;van den Bent, Martin J;Vincent, Arnaud Jpe;Niessen, Wiro J;Klein, Stefan;Smits, Marion;
300 views DOI Abstract
2012
Inhibitors targeting mitosis: tales of how great drugs against a promising target were brought down by a flawed rationale.
Komlodi-Pasztor, Edina;Sackett, Dan L;Fojo, Antonio Tito;
Vol. 18 , No. 1 , pp. 51-63
293 views DOI Abstract
2006
Mechanisms underlying the development of androgen-independent prostate cancer
Pienta KJ;Bradley D;;
Vol. 12 , No. 6 , pp. -
244 views Abstract
View All 11 Articles
43
Overall
Below Average
31
35
30
40
32
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

43.5/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

31.0/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

32.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.