[rinsho ketsueki] the japanese journal of clinical hematology | Journament

Journal Ranking

#4788 / 33,968
📉 Poor
Overall Score
37.7/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
35
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 2 weeks ago

[rinsho ketsueki] the japanese journal of clinical hematology

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
ncbi
Short Name rinsho ketsueki
Abbreviated Name rinsho ketsueki
ISSN 0485-1439
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (20 total)

2017
indications for suboptimal low-dose direct oral anticoagulants for non-valvular atrial fibrillation patients
;Masahiko Umei, MD;Mikio Kishi, MD;Takahiro Sato, MD, PhD;Akito Shindo, MD;Masayuki Toyoda, MD;Masaaki Yokoyama, MD;Masashiro Matsushita, MD;Satoshi Ohnishi, MD;Masao Yamasaki, MD, PhD
Vol. 33 , No. 5 , pp. 475-482
520 views DOI Abstract
2014
prognostic impact of atrial fibrillation in patients with acute myocardial infarction
;Shunta Tateyama, MD;Takumi Higuma, MD;Tomohide Endo, MD;Shuji Shibutani, MD;Kenji Hanada, MD;Hiroaki Yokoyama, MD;Masahiro Yamada, MD;Naoki Abe, MD;Shingo Sasaki, MD;Masaomi Kimura, MD;Ken Okumura, MD
Vol. 30 , No. 6 , pp. 460-465
450 views DOI Abstract
[Acute myeloid leukemia with sudden onset bilateral lower extremity paralysis caused by disseminated mucormycosis following unrelated bone marrow transplantation].
Itakusu, Kyoko;Inoue, Tomonori;Abe, Masaya;Ueda, Ryo;Sakurai, Aki;Miyazaki, Yukihiro;Nakase, Koichi;Yoshida, Isao;Nawa, Yuichiro;
Vol. 60 , No. 1 , pp. 17-21
334 views DOI Abstract
2019
[Precision medicine for acute myeloid leukemia based on genomic profiling].
Sanada, Masashi;
Vol. 60 , No. 7 , pp. 847-853
279 views DOI Abstract
2019
[Concurrent CALR and SF3B1 gene mutations in a patient with myelodysplastic/myeloproliferative neoplasm with ring sideroblasts and thrombocytosis].
Nakao, Kensuke;Oka, Satoshi;Utsumi, Takahiko;Yamada, Seiko;Kondo, Toshinori;Tohyama, Kaoru;Asagoe, Kohsuke;
Vol. 60 , No. 8 , pp. 915-919
273 views DOI Abstract
1997
[Relationship between the presence of side-holes in bone marrow aspiration needle and the number of harvested bone marrow mononuclear cells]
Tanikawa S;Sakamaki H;Mori S;Akiyama H;Miyamoto H;Tanaka Y;Yoshinaga H;Okamoto R;Maeda Y;Mukaiyama T;Sasaki T;Kaku H;Matsuura Y;Hiruma K;Onozawa Y;Adachi Y;;
Vol. 38 , No. 12 , pp. -
250 views Abstract
2014
ehra/hrs/aphrs expert consensus on ventricular arrhythmias
;Christian Torp Pedersen;G. Neal Kay;Jonathan Kalman;Martin Borggrefe;Paolo Della-Bella;Timm Dickfeld;Paul Dorian;Heikki Huikuri;Youg-Hoon Kim;Bradley Knight;Francis Marchlinski;David Ross;Frédéric Sacher;John Sapp;Kalyanam Shivkumar;Kyoko Soejima;Hiroshi Tada;Mark E. Alexander;John K. Triedman;Takumi Yamada;Paulus Kirchhof;Gregory Y.H. Lip;Karl Heinz Kuck;Lluís Mont;David Haines;Jukia Indik;John Dimarco;Derek Exner;Yoshito Iesaka;Irene Savelieva
Vol. 30 , No. 5 , pp. 327-349
244 views DOI
2016
management of antithrombotic therapy during cardiac implantable device surgery
;Ahmed AlTurki, MD;Riccardo Proietti, MD, PhD;David H. Birnie, MD;Vidal Essebag, MD, PhD, FRCPC, FACC
Vol. 32 , No. 3 , pp. 163-169
243 views DOI Abstract
2017
the inferior displacement of the his bundle and fast pathway in a patient with common type atrioventricular nodal tachycardia: three-dimensional computed tomography analysis
;Kunihiko Kiuchi, MD, FHRS;Koji Fukuzawa, MD;Mori Shumpei, MD;Tatsuya Nishii, MD
Vol. 33 , No. 2 , pp. 147-149
239 views DOI Abstract
2017
[Overview]
Yamaguchi H;;
Vol. 58 , No. 4 , pp. -
238 views Abstract
View All 20 Articles
38
Overall
Poor
31
15
30
40
35
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

37.7/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.6/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

34.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.