indications for suboptimal low-dose direct oral anticoagulants for non-valvular atrial fibrillation patients
Clicks: 563
ID: 131607
2017
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Steady Performance
81.0
/100
563 views
408 readers
Trending
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
SteadyRanked #1 of 20 articles by views in [rinsho ketsueki] the japanese journal of clinical hematology
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Background: Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have been developed for stroke prevention in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF). We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients with NVAF who were newly treated with DOACs in a real-world clinical setting.
Methods: We retrospectively analyzed patients with NVAF newly treated with one of three DOACs—dabigatran, rivaroxaban, or apixaban—between January 1, 2013, and December 31, 2015.
Results: A total of 670 patients with NVAF who were newly prescribed one of the three DOACs were analyzed; 74 patients (10.9%) received dabigatran, 290 (43.3%) received rivaroxaban, and 306 (45.8%) received apixaban. Fifteen patients had thromboembolic events, almost half of which were due to discontinuation of DOACs. Six patients had major bleeding, although almost all were discharged with good neurological prognoses. A total of 129 patients were treated with a suboptimal low-dose DOAC; none experienced a thromboembolic event as long as the DOAC was taken regularly, and none of the patients in any of the three DOAC groups had major bleeding events.
Conclusions: With good adherence, the clinical course associated with DOACs is comparatively good. In the future, suboptimal low-dose DOAC therapy may serve as an appropriate choice for some patients with a high risk of stroke and bleeding.
| Reference Key |
md2017journalindications
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | ;Masahiko Umei, MD;Mikio Kishi, MD;Takahiro Sato, MD, PhD;Akito Shindo, MD;Masayuki Toyoda, MD;Masaaki Yokoyama, MD;Masashiro Matsushita, MD;Satoshi Ohnishi, MD;Masao Yamasaki, MD, PhD |
| Journal | [rinsho ketsueki] the japanese journal of clinical hematology |
| Year | 2017 |
| DOI |
10.1016/j.joa.2017.05.008
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.