Indexed in Journament

BMJ (Clinical research ed.)

ISSN 1756-1833· EN

Certificate of Indexing
Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
40.2 / 100
Journament Score
Below Average
Ranked #2,318 of 29,297 scored journals (34,015 indexed)
21 Articles
Scores higher than 92% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name BMJ
Abbreviated Name BMJ (Clinical research ed.)
ISSN 1756-1833

Quality Profile

5 of 12 dimensions measured
Engagement 30.8
Timeliness 20.0
Innovation 70.0
Community Impact 4.3
Content Distribution 69.5
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

7 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left out entirely rather than plotted as zero, and with 5 dimensions measured there is not enough of a profile to draw as a shape.

Show the numbers
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.8 30.4
Accessibility — 23.1
Timeliness 20.0 3.0
Diversity — 26.4
Innovation 70.0 24.1
Community Impact 4.3 4.4
Content Distribution 69.5 89.3
Content Quality — 55.1
Ethics & Transparency — 40.5
Editorial Standards — 33.0
Publication Regularity — 52.9
Geographic Reach — 30.4

Publications Per Year

Articles (21)

2017
Association between continuity of care in general practice and hospital admissions for ambulatory care sensitive conditions: cross sectional study of routinely collected, person level data
Barker I;Steventon A;Deeny SR;;
Vol. 356 , pp. -
644 views Abstract
2004
Health related virtual communities and electronic support groups: systematic review of the effects of online peer to peer interactions
Eysenbach G;Powell J;Englesakis M;Rizo C;Stern A;;
Vol. 328 , No. 7449 , pp. -
414 views Abstract
1999
Incidence of malaria among children living near dams in northern Ethiopia: community based incidence survey
Ghebreyesus TA;Haile M;Witten KH;Getachew A;Yohannes AM;Yohannes M;Teklehaimanot HD;Lindsay SW;Byass P;;
Vol. 319 , No. 7211 , pp. -
396 views Abstract
2003
Prognostic indicators of early and late death in children admitted to district hospital in Kenya: cohort study
Berkley JA;Ross A;Mwangi I;Osier FH;Mohammed M;Shebbe M;Lowe BS;Marsh K;Newton CR;;
Vol. 326 , No. 7385 , pp. -
375 views Abstract
2000
Educational differences in smoking: international comparison
Cavelaars AE;Kunst AE;Geurts JJ;Crialesi R;Grötvedt L;Helmert U;Lahelma E;Lundberg O;Matheson J;Mielck A;Rasmussen NK;Regidor E;do Rosário-Giraldes M;Spuhler T;Mackenbach JP;;
Vol. 320 , No. 7242 , pp. -
374 views Abstract
1988
Adhesive Escherichia coli in inflammatory bowel disease and infective diarrhoea
Burke DA;Axon AT;;
Vol. 297 , No. 6641 , pp. -
368 views Abstract
2004
What's the evidence that NICE guidance has been implemented? Results from a national evaluation using time series analysis, audit of patients' notes, and interviews
Sheldon TA;Cullum N;Dawson D;Lankshear A;Lowson K;Watt I;West P;Wright D;Wright J;;
Vol. 329 , No. 7473 , pp. -
363 views Abstract
2007
Use of probiotic Lactobacillus preparation to prevent diarrhoea associated with antibiotics: randomised double blind placebo controlled trial
Hickson M;D'Souza AL;Muthu N;Rogers TR;Want S;Rajkumar C;Bulpitt CJ;;
Vol. 335 , No. 7610 , pp. -
360 views Abstract
2010
Implementation and adoption of nationwide electronic health records in secondary care in England: qualitative analysis of interim results from a prospective national evaluation
Robertson A;Cresswell K;Takian A;Petrakaki D;Crowe S;Cornford T;Barber N;Avery A;Fernando B;Jacklin A;Prescott R;Klecun E;Paton J;Lichtner V;Quinn C;Ali M;Morrison Z;Jani Y;Waring J;Marsden K;Sheikh A;;
Vol. 341 , pp. -
355 views Abstract
2005
Randomised controlled trial of intravenous antibiotic treatment for cellulitis at home compared with hospital
Corwin P;Toop L;McGeoch G;Than M;Wynn-Thomas S;Wells JE;Dawson R;Abernethy P;Pithie A;Chambers S;Fletcher L;Richards D;;
Vol. 330 , No. 7483 , pp. -
332 views Abstract
2023
When I use a word . . . Medical slang: gomers and gomerettes.
Aronson, Jeffrey K;
Vol. 382 , pp. 1696
208 views DOI
2023
What next for decolonising health and medicine?
Clark, Jocalyn;Hurley, Richard;Ladher, Navjoyt;Jarvies, Duncan;
Vol. 383 , pp. p2302
141 views DOI
2023
Sharp Scratch episode 89: What's in a name?
Ugwuja, Judith;
Vol. 382 , pp. p2106
119 views DOI
2023
Sixty seconds on . . . ChatGPT
Looi, M.K.
Vol. 380 , pp. p205
126 views DOI
2021
Omicron: we must protect the health and wellbeing of the public health workforce.
Pinho-Gomes, Ana-Catarina;Allen, Alexander;Rae, Maggie;Ryder, Julian;
Vol. 375 , pp. n3123
162 views DOI
2017
Association between continuity of care in general practice and hospital admissions for ambulatory care sensitive conditions: cross sectional study of routinely collected, person level data
Barker I;Steventon A;Deeny SR;;
Vol. 356 , pp. -
644 views Abstract
2015
Patient commentary: social media provides patients with support, information, and friendship
Greene A;;
Vol. 350 , pp. -
272 views Abstract
2010
Implementation and adoption of nationwide electronic health records in secondary care in England: qualitative analysis of interim results from a prospective national evaluation
Robertson A;Cresswell K;Takian A;Petrakaki D;Crowe S;Cornford T;Barber N;Avery A;Fernando B;Jacklin A;Prescott R;Klecun E;Paton J;Lichtner V;Quinn C;Ali M;Morrison Z;Jani Y;Waring J;Marsden K;Sheikh A;;
Vol. 341 , pp. -
355 views Abstract
2010
Why are we copyrighting science?
de Silva V;Hanwella R;;
Vol. 341 , pp. -
151 views Abstract
2007
Use of probiotic Lactobacillus preparation to prevent diarrhoea associated with antibiotics: randomised double blind placebo controlled trial
Hickson M;D'Souza AL;Muthu N;Rogers TR;Want S;Rajkumar C;Bulpitt CJ;;
Vol. 335 , No. 7610 , pp. -
360 views Abstract
Journament Score
40.2/100 · Below Average
Ranked #2,318 of 29,297 scored
(34,015 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.
Journament

Overall Quality Score

40.2/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.8/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

4.3/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

20.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

69.5/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.