What's the evidence that NICE guidance has been implemented? Results from a national evaluation using time series analysis, audit of patients' notes, and interviews
Clicks: 249
ID: 268423
2004
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Improving Quality
0.0
/100
Combines engagement data with AI-assessed academic quality
Reader Engagement
Emerging Content
8.1
/100
27 views
27 readers
Trending
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Abstract
Implementation of NICE guidance has been variable. Guidance seems more likely to be adopted when there is strong professional support, a stable and convincing evidence base, and no increased or unfunded costs, in organisations that have established good systems for tracking guidance implementation a …
| Reference Key |
ta2004bmjwhat's
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Sheldon TA;Cullum N;Dawson D;Lankshear A;Lowson K;Watt I;West P;Wright D;Wright J;; |
| Journal | BMJ (Clinical research ed.) |
| Year | 2004 |
| DOI |
DOI not found
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
National Center for Biotechnology Information
NCBI
NLM
MEDLINE
humans
pubmed abstract
nih
national institutes of health
national library of medicine
research support
non-u.s. gov't
female
united kingdom
practice guidelines as topic*
guideline adherence*
medical audit
pmid:15514342
pmc524545
doi:10.1136/bmj.329.7473.999
trevor a sheldon
nicky cullum
john wright
quality of health care* / economics
quality of health care* / standards
state medicine / standards*
technology assessment
biomedical
|
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.