Indexed in Journament

Algerian Journal of Biosceinces

ISSN 2716-9375· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
23.0 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #28,010 of 29,312 scored journals (34,012 indexed)
18 Articles
Scores higher than 4.4% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Algerian journal of Biosciences (AJB) aims to establish itself as a platform for exchanging ideas in new emerging trends in biological, Agricultural science. as well as Ecological and Environmental science that needs more focus and exposure and is always committed to publish articles that will strengthen the knowledge of all biologists, researchers, academics and staff. Subject areas covered of Biological Sciences, Agricultural sciences and Environmental science.
Short Name Alger. j. biosciences
Abbreviated Name Alger. j. biosciences.
ISSN 2716-9375
URL http://www.journal.acse.science/index.php/ajb/index
Author Instructions http://www.journal.acse.science/index.php/ajb/Instructions

Quality Profile

6 of 12 dimensions measured
Engagement 30.4
Accessibility 30.0
Timeliness 0.0
Innovation 1.5
Community Impact 3.6
Content Distribution 61.9
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

6 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left out entirely rather than plotted as zero, and with 6 dimensions measured there is not enough of a profile to draw as a shape.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for Algerian Journal of Biosceinces
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.4 30.4
Accessibility 30.0 20.4
Timeliness 0.0 5.8
Diversity 24.4
Innovation 1.5 25.7
Community Impact 3.6 5.8
Content Distribution 61.9 88.6
Content Quality 55.5
Ethics & Transparency 40.2
Editorial Standards 33.4
Publication Regularity 53.2
Geographic Reach 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (18)

2020
Level and Health Risk Evaluation of Heavy Metals and Microorganisms in Urban Soils of Lagos, Southwest Nigeria
Vol. 01 , No. 02 , pp. 51-60
378 views DOI Abstract
2020
Biological control by Plant Growth Promoting Rhizobacteria
Vol. 01 , No. 02 , pp. 30-36
324 views DOI Abstract
2020
Effects of extraction methods on total polyphenols, free radical scavenging and antibacterial activity of crude extracts of Cleome arabica L. growing in Oued Souf region
Vol. 1 , No. 1 , pp. 14-17
317 views DOI Abstract
2020
The Effects of the Fertil Verde Fertilizer on the Growth and Yield of Chili Pepper (Capsicum annuum L) in Southern Algeria
Vol. 1 , No. 1 , pp. 18-23
310 views DOI Abstract
2020
Characterization and acute toxicity evaluation of the MgO Nanoparticles Synthesized from Aqueous Leaf Extract of Ocimum basilicum L
Vol. 1 , No. 1 , pp. 1-6
298 views DOI Abstract
2021
Phytochemistry, In-vitro antioxidant, Microbicidal, Anti-ulcerogenic and Biosafety Potential of Emilia coccinea Aqueous Extract in Animal models.
Vol. 02 , No. 02 , pp. 67-77
295 views DOI Abstract
2021
Diversity and distribution patterns of reptiles in the northern Algerian Sahara (Oued Souf, Taibet and Touggourt)
Vol. 02 , No. 02 , pp. 78-87
294 views DOI Abstract
2021
Phenomenon of partial and total albinism in the Hybrid Sparrows Passer domesticus X Passer hispaniolensis in Algeria
Vol. 02 , No. 02 , pp. 56-58
294 views DOI Abstract
2020
Phytochemical study, nutritive value, antioxidant and anti-inflammatory activities of phenolic extracts from desert plant Calligonum comosum L'Hér.
Vol. 01 , No. 02 , pp. 68-75
287 views DOI Abstract
2020
Microbial soft rot of cultivated fruits and vegetables
Vol. 01 , No. 02 , pp. 37-45
264 views DOI Abstract
2021
The medicinal plants of Bousaada (M’sila, Algeria)
Vol. 02 , No. 02 , pp. 88-92
73 views DOI Abstract
2021
Diversity and distribution patterns of reptiles in the northern Algerian Sahara (Oued Souf, Taibet and Touggourt)
Vol. 02 , No. 02 , pp. 78-87
294 views DOI Abstract
2021
Phytochemistry, In-vitro antioxidant, Microbicidal, Anti-ulcerogenic and Biosafety Potential of Emilia coccinea Aqueous Extract in Animal models.
Vol. 02 , No. 02 , pp. 67-77
295 views DOI Abstract
2021
In-vitro Antioxidant activity, Biosafety, Nociceptive and Anti-inflammatory potential of Acetone Polyherbal (ELNA) Extract in mice
Vol. 02 , No. 02 , pp. 59-66
128 views DOI Abstract
2021
Phenomenon of partial and total albinism in the Hybrid Sparrows Passer domesticus X Passer hispaniolensis in Algeria
Vol. 02 , No. 02 , pp. 56-58
294 views DOI Abstract
2020
Ecodendrometric parameters of some medicinal plants in Aleppo pine forests of northern Sétif (Algeria)
Vol. 01 , No. 02 , pp. 61-67
117 views DOI Abstract
2020
Integration of prior information in Kaplan Meier estimator using Bayesian approach
Vol. 01 , No. 02 , pp. 76-82
107 views DOI Abstract
2020
Synthesis and biological activity of 2-((3-Cyano-4,6-distyrylpyridin-2-yl) thio) acetamide and its cyclized form
Vol. 01 , No. 02 , pp. 46-50
25 views DOI Abstract
2020
Phytochemical study, nutritive value, antioxidant and anti-inflammatory activities of phenolic extracts from desert plant Calligonum comosum L'Hér.
Vol. 01 , No. 02 , pp. 68-75
287 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
23.0/100 · Poor
Ranked #28,010 of 29,312 scored
(34,012 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

23.0/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.4/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

30.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

1.5/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

3.6/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

61.9/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.