hungarian geographical bulletin | Journament

Journal Ranking

#7672 / 33,981
📉 Poor
Overall Score
37.5/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
32
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 1 month ago

hungarian geographical bulletin

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Certificate of Indexing
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
Short Name hungarian geographical bulletin
Abbreviated Name hungarian geographical bulletin
ISSN
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (33 total)

2017
The evaluation and application of an urban land cover map with image data fusion and laboratory measurements
Mucsi, László;Liska, Csilla Mariann;Henits, László;Tobak, Zalán;Csendes, Bálint;Nagy, László;
Vol. 66 , No. 2 , pp. 145-156
378 views Abstract
2014
research governance and scientific knowledge production in the gambia
;Frederick U. Ozor
Vol. 110 , No. 9/10 , pp. 9-9
370 views DOI Abstract
2016
a broader view of stewardship to achieve conservation and sustainability goals in south africa
;Jaco Barendse;Dirk Roux;Bianca Currie;Natasha Wilson;Christo Fabricius
Vol. 112 , No. 5/6 , pp. 15-15
344 views DOI Abstract
2018
the cranium of sts 5 ('mrs ples') in relation to sexual dimorphism of australopithecus africanus
;Gaokgatlhe M. Tawane;J. Francis Thackeray
Vol. 114 , No. 1/2 , pp. 4-4
312 views DOI
2017
Czech travelogues about Soviet Russia and the Soviet Union – a neglected source for historical geography
David, Jaroslav;Glogarová, Jana Davidová;
Vol. 66 , No. 4 , pp. 295-306
310 views Abstract
2018
Evaluation of debris flow susceptibility in El Salvador (CA): a comparison between Multivariate Adaptive Regression Splines (MARS) and Binary Logistic Regression (BLR)
Rotigliano, Edoardo;Martinello, Chiara;Agnesi, Valerio;Conoscenti, Christian;
Vol. 67 , No. 4 , pp. 361-373
304 views Abstract
2017
understanding the polarisation of environmental and social activism in south africa
;Hannah R. Simon
Vol. 112 , No. 11/12 , pp. 2-2
301 views DOI
2014
open access in south africa: a case study and reflections
;Laura Czerniewicz;Sarah Goodie
Vol. 110 , No. 9/10 , pp. 9-9
296 views DOI Abstract
2018
Preston, C.J. (ed.): Climate Justice and Geoengineering: Ethics and Policy in the Atmospheric Anthropocene
Dékány, Anett;
Vol. 67 , No. 2 , pp. 191-193
273 views Abstract
2017
Islam in Italy: insights from a Europe-Mediterranean perspective
Paradiso, Maria;
Vol. 66 , No. 3 , pp. 251-263
255 views Abstract
View All 33 Articles
37
Overall
Poor
31
15
30
40
32
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

37.5/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.5/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

32.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.