Indexed in Journament

hungarian geographical bulletin

EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
37.5 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #14,181 of 33,995 indexed journals
33 Articles
Accessibility 15
Engagement 31
The Journament Score combines content quality, publication ethics and transparency, editorial standards, publication regularity, accessibility and reader engagement into a single 0–100 figure. It is recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed.

About This Journal

Short Name hungarian geographical bulletin
Abbreviated Name hungarian geographical bulletin

Publications Per Year

Articles (33)

2014
research governance and scientific knowledge production in the gambia
Vol. 110 , No. 9/10 , pp. 9-9
399 views DOI Abstract
2017
The evaluation and application of an urban land cover map with image data fusion and laboratory measurements
Vol. 66 , No. 2 , pp. 145-156
392 views Abstract
2016
a broader view of stewardship to achieve conservation and sustainability goals in south africa
Vol. 112 , No. 5/6 , pp. 15-15
363 views DOI Abstract
2017
Czech travelogues about Soviet Russia and the Soviet Union – a neglected source for historical geography
Vol. 66 , No. 4 , pp. 295-306
344 views Abstract
2018
the cranium of sts 5 ('mrs ples') in relation to sexual dimorphism of australopithecus africanus
Vol. 114 , No. 1/2 , pp. 4-4
334 views DOI
2018
Evaluation of debris flow susceptibility in El Salvador (CA): a comparison between Multivariate Adaptive Regression Splines (MARS) and Binary Logistic Regression (BLR)
Vol. 67 , No. 4 , pp. 361-373
318 views Abstract
2017
understanding the polarisation of environmental and social activism in south africa
Vol. 112 , No. 11/12 , pp. 2-2
318 views DOI
2014
open access in south africa: a case study and reflections
Vol. 110 , No. 9/10 , pp. 9-9
311 views DOI Abstract
2017
potential for identifying plant-based toxins on san hunter-gatherer arrowheads
Vol. 113 , No. 3/4 , pp. 10-10
282 views DOI Abstract
2020
updated account of angola’s remarkable biodiversity
Vol. 116 , No. 1/2 , pp. -
149 views DOI
2020
pleistocene large reptile tracks and probable swim traces on south africa’s cape south coast
Vol. 116 , No. 3/4 , pp. 1-8
206 views DOI Abstract
2018
the cranium of sts 5 ('mrs ples') in relation to sexual dimorphism of australopithecus africanus
Vol. 114 , No. 1/2 , pp. 4-4
334 views DOI
2018
temporal ranges and ancestry in the hominin fossil record: the case of australopithecus sediba
Vol. 114 , No. 3/4 , pp. 7-7
134 views DOI Abstract
2018
Evaluation of debris flow susceptibility in El Salvador (CA): a comparison between Multivariate Adaptive Regression Splines (MARS) and Binary Logistic Regression (BLR)
Vol. 67 , No. 4 , pp. 361-373
318 views Abstract
2017
potential for identifying plant-based toxins on san hunter-gatherer arrowheads
Vol. 113 , No. 3/4 , pp. 10-10
282 views DOI Abstract
2017
understanding the polarisation of environmental and social activism in south africa
Vol. 112 , No. 11/12 , pp. 2-2
318 views DOI
2017
the complex origin of modern humans
Vol. 113 , No. 9/10 , pp. 2-2
145 views DOI
2017
Czech travelogues about Soviet Russia and the Soviet Union – a neglected source for historical geography
Vol. 66 , No. 4 , pp. 295-306
344 views Abstract
Journament Score
37.5/100 · Poor
Ranked #14,181 of 33,995

Overall Quality Score

37.5/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.5/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

32.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.