Indexed in Journament

İstanbul Hukuk Mecmuası

ISSN 2636-7734· EN

Certificate of Indexing
Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
21.6 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #23,361 of 23,453 scored journals (33,995 indexed)
26 Articles
Scores higher than 0.3% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name İstanbul Hukuk Mecmuası
Abbreviated Name İstanbul Hukuk Mecmuası
ISSN 2636-7734

Quality Profile

5 of 12 dimensions measured
Engagement 30.1
Timeliness 0.0
Innovation 1.5
Community Impact 0.0
Content Distribution 64.4
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

7 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left out entirely rather than plotted as zero, and with 5 dimensions measured there is not enough of a profile to draw as a shape.

Show the numbers
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.1 30.0
Accessibility — 19.5
Timeliness 0.0 33.8
Diversity — 30.1
Innovation 1.5 36.0
Community Impact 0.0 22.8
Content Distribution 64.4 86.4
Content Quality — 54.2
Ethics & Transparency — 39.5
Editorial Standards — 32.5
Publication Regularity — 51.6
Geographic Reach — 30.0

Publications Per Year

Articles (26)

2020
Dünyada ve Ülkemizde Online Uyuşmazlık Çözümleri Bağlamında Online Tahkim ve Uygulamaları
Seda ÖZMUMCU;
Vol. 78 , No. 2 , pp. 431-454
168 views DOI Abstract
2020
COVID-19 (Koronavirüs) Salgını Sürecinde Yapılan İdari Muamelelerin Hukuka Uygunluğu ve İdarenin Sorumluluğu Meselesi
Seyit Rasim DORU;
Vol. 78 , No. 2 , pp. 769-807
160 views DOI Abstract
2020
Dünya Sağlık Örgütü ve Uluslararasi Sağlık Tüzüğü: COVID-19 Örneğinde Uluslararası Hukukta Salgın Hastalıklarla Mücadele
İ̇brahim KAYA;Galip Engin ŞİMŞEK;
Vol. 78 , No. 2 , pp. 983-1007
159 views DOI Abstract
2020
Teletıp, Sağlık Turizmi ve Uzaktan Sağlık Hizmetleri: Mesafeli Sözleşmeler
Yakup Gökhan DOĞRAMACI;
Vol. 78 , No. 2 , pp. 657-710
158 views DOI Abstract
2020
Uluslararası Hukuka Aykırılığı Ortadan Kaldıran Haller Bakımından Devletlerin Uluslararası Sorumluluğu ve COVID-19 Pandemisi Bağlamında Bir Değerlendirme
Ufuk DAL;
Vol. 78 , No. 2 , pp. 1047-1068
152 views DOI Abstract
2020
Taşıma Hukukunda Riziko Alanı İlkesi Bağlamında Nötr Alan ve COVID-19’un Nötr Alan Olarak Değerlendirilmesi
Vural SEVEN;Ahmet BATUHAN;
Vol. 78 , No. 2 , pp. 611-655
140 views DOI Abstract
2020
COVID-19 Salgınının İcra ve İflâs Hukuku Alanına Etkileri
Murat ATALI;Ersin ERDOĞAN;
Vol. 78 , No. 2 , pp. 395-416
140 views DOI Abstract
2020
Vergi Hukukunda Mücbir Sebep ve Hukuksal Sonuçları Üzerine Eleştirisel Bir Yaklaşım ve Öneriler
Esra EKMEKCİ;Gülsen GÜNEŞ;Mahmut KAŞIKCI;Gamze GÜMÜŞKAYA;
Vol. 78 , No. 2 , pp. 1069-1138
140 views DOI Abstract
2020
Bireysel İş Hukuku Açısından Zorlayıcı ve Zorunlu Sebeplere Bağlı Olarak Ortaya Çıkan Çalışma Koşullarının Yeni Koronavirüs (Covid-19) Nedeniyle Gerçekleştirilen Son Yasal Değişiklikler Bağlamında Değerlendirilmesi
Yusuf YİĞİT;
Vol. 78 , No. 2 , pp. 265-297
132 views DOI Abstract
2020
COVID-19 Pandemisinin Zaman Çarteri Sözleşmeleri Üzerindeki Etkilerinin “Off-Hire” Klozu Bağlamında İncelenmesi
Melda TAŞKIN;
Vol. 78 , No. 2 , pp. 333-362
128 views DOI Abstract
2020
Dünyada ve Ülkemizde Online Uyuşmazlık Çözümleri Bağlamında Online Tahkim ve Uygulamaları
Seda ÖZMUMCU;
Vol. 78 , No. 2 , pp. 431-454
168 views DOI Abstract
2020
COVID-19 Salgını Sebebiyle Uygulanan Sokağa Çıkma Kısıtlamalarının 1982 Anayasası’na Uygunluğu
Volkan ASLAN;
Vol. 78 , No. 2 , pp. 809-835
97 views DOI Abstract
2020
Koruma Amacıyla Özgürlüğün Kısıtlanması Kurumunun Ağır Tehlike Arz Eden Salgın Hastalık Hali Bakımından Elverişliliğinin Değerlendirilmesi
Nil KARABAĞ BULUT;
Vol. 78 , No. 2 , pp. 517-561
114 views DOI Abstract
2020
Yargı Alanındaki Hak Kayıplarının Önlenmesi Amacıyla 7226 Sayılı Kanun Geçici Madde 1 ile Getirilen Bazı Sürelerin Durmasına İlişkin Düzenlemenin Smk’daki Hoşgörü Sürelerine Etkisi
Mehmet ERDEM;Fülürya YUSUFOĞLU BİLGİN;
Vol. 78 , No. 2 , pp. 711-736
31 views DOI Abstract
2020
Bulaşıcı Hastalıklara İlişkin Tedbirlere Aykırı Davranma Suçu (TCK md 195)
Recep KAHRAMAN;
Vol. 78 , No. 2 , pp. 737-767
34 views DOI Abstract
2020
COVID-19 Pandemisinin Zaman Çarteri Sözleşmeleri Üzerindeki Etkilerinin “Off-Hire” Klozu Bağlamında İncelenmesi
Melda TAŞKIN;
Vol. 78 , No. 2 , pp. 333-362
128 views DOI Abstract
2020
Uluslararası Hukuka Aykırılığı Ortadan Kaldıran Haller Bakımından Devletlerin Uluslararası Sorumluluğu ve COVID-19 Pandemisi Bağlamında Bir Değerlendirme
Ufuk DAL;
Vol. 78 , No. 2 , pp. 1047-1068
152 views DOI Abstract
2020
Teletıp, Sağlık Turizmi ve Uzaktan Sağlık Hizmetleri: Mesafeli Sözleşmeler
Yakup Gökhan DOĞRAMACI;
Vol. 78 , No. 2 , pp. 657-710
158 views DOI Abstract
2020
COVID-19 Salgını ve Bulaşıcı Hastalıkların Yarattığı Küresel Krizlerle Mücadelede Uluslararası Hukuk
Cüneyt YÜKSEL;Deniz BARAN;
Vol. 78 , No. 2 , pp. 885-934
111 views DOI Abstract
2020
Çekin İbrazında Mücbir Sebepler: COVID-19 Salgını Örneğinde TK M 811 Hükmünün Değerlendirilmesi
Koray DEMİR;
Vol. 78 , No. 2 , pp. 417-430
78 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
21.6/100 · Poor
Ranked #23,361 of 23,453 scored
(33,995 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.
Journament

Overall Quality Score

21.6/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.1/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

1.5/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

0.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

64.4/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.