journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia | Journament

Journal Ranking

#1719 / 33,954
📉 Poor
Overall Score
39.9/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
35
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 5 days ago

journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus ncbi ulakbim
Short Name j cardiothorac vasc anesth
Abbreviated Name j cardiothorac vasc anesth
ISSN 1053-0770
Aim and Scope
URL https://www.journals.elsevier.com/journal-of-cardiothoracic-and-vascular-anesthesia
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (18 total)

2018
Association of Serratus Anterior Plane Block for Minimally Invasive Direct Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery With Higher Opioid Consumption: A Retrospective Observational Study.
Moll, Vanessa;Maffeo, Carla;Mitchell, Matthew;Ward, Ceressa T;Groff, Robert F;Lee, Simon C;Halkos, Michael E;Jabaley, Craig S;O'Reilly-Shah, Vikas N;
Vol. 32 , No. 6 , pp. 2570-2577
356 views DOI Abstract
2020
Pilot Study Suggests Smartphone Application Knowledge Improves Resident Transesophageal Echocardiography Knowledge: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
Linganna, Regina E;Patel, Samuel J;Ghofaily, Lourdes Al;Mackay, Emily J;Spelde, Audrey E;Zhou, Elizabeth Y;Kukafka, Jeremy D;Feinman, Jared W;Augoustides, John G;Weiss, Stuart;
328 views DOI Abstract
2017
Ultrasound-Guided Paravertebral Catheter Versus Intercostal Blocks for Postoperative Pain Control in Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery: A Prospective Randomized Trial.
Hutchins, Jacob;Sanchez, Jeremy;Andrade, Rafael;Podgaetz, Eitan;Wang, Qi;Sikka, Robby;
Vol. 31 , No. 2 , pp. 458-463
322 views DOI Abstract
2018
Multilevel Thoracic Paravertebral Block Using Ropivacaine With/Without Dexmedetomidine in Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery
Xu, J.
Vol. 32 , pp. 318-324
313 views DOI Abstract
2019
Nutrition in Adult Cardiac Surgery: Preoperative Evaluation, Management in the Postoperative Period, and Clinical Implications for Outcomes
Lopez-Delgado, J.
Vol. 33 , pp. 3143-3162
306 views DOI
2019
Analysis of Conduction Abnormalities and Permanent Pacemaker Implantation After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.
Subramani, Sudhakar;Arora, Lovkesh;Krishnan, Sundar;Hanada, Satoshi;Sharma, Archit;Ramakrishna, Harish;
305 views DOI Abstract
2019
What's Next? Pythagorean Approach in Ultrasound-Guided Thoracic Paravertebral Block.
Rispoli, Marco;Vetrugno, Luigi;Santonastaso, Domenico Pietro;Bove, Tiziana;Bignami, Elena Giovanna;Corcione, Antonio;
304 views DOI
2019
Internet-Based Intraoperative Real-Time Transesophageal Echocardiography in Cardiac Surgery.
Yano, Kiichi;Kanda, Hirotsugu;Iida, Takafumi;Hayashi, Kentaro;Toyama, Yuki;Kunisawa, Takayuki;
279 views DOI
2018
Paravertebral Block for Thoracic Surgery
D'Ercole, F.
Vol. 32 , pp. 915-927
272 views DOI Abstract
1997
Cardiac mechanical energy and effects on the arterial tree.
Muñoz, H R;Sacco, C M;
Vol. 11 , No. 3 , pp. 289-98
272 views Abstract
View All 18 Articles
40
Overall
Poor
31
35
30
40
35
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

39.9/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.7/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

35.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.