inorganic chemistry communications | Journament

Journal Ranking

#245 / 33,855
📉 Poor
Overall Score
38.9/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
37
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 1 week ago

inorganic chemistry communications

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus
Short Name inorganic chemistry communications
Abbreviated Name inorganic chemistry communications
ISSN 13877003
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions
Added by Said Nadeem on Jul 08, 2019

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (42 total)

2015
comparison of the knowledge, attitudes, and perception of barriers regarding adverse drug reaction reporting between pharmacy and medical students in pakistan
;Muhammad Umair Khan;Akram Ahmad;Areeba Ejaz;Syed Ata Rizvi;Ayesha Sardar;Kazim Hussain;Tayyaba Zaffar;Shazia Q. Jamshed
Vol. 12 , pp. -
420 views DOI Abstract
2015
an assessment blueprint for the advanced medical life support two-day prehospital emergency medical services training program in the united states
;Les R. Becker;Matt Vassar
Vol. 12 , pp. -
353 views DOI Abstract
2014
learning style preferences of nursing students at two universities in iran and malaysia
;Abdolghani Abdollahimohammad;Rogayah Ja’afar
Vol. 11 , pp. 30-
344 views DOI Abstract
2016
educational strategies for teaching evidence-based practice to undergraduate health students: systematic review
;Konstantinos Kyriakoulis;Athina Patelarou;Aggelos Laliotis;Andrew C Wan;Michail Matalliotakis;Chrysoula Tsiou;Evridiki Patelarou
Vol. 13 , pp. -
337 views DOI Abstract
2013
medical students’ perception of the educational environment in a medical college in india: a cross-sectional study using the dundee ready education environment questionnaire
;Varun Kohli;Upreet Dhaliwal
Vol. 10 , pp. -
336 views DOI Abstract
2017
clinical empathy in medical students in india measured using the jefferson scale of empathy–student version
;Anirban Chatterjee;Rajkrishna Ravikumar;Satendra Singh;Pranjal Singh Chauhan;Manu Goel;Sun Huh
Vol. 14 , pp. -
335 views DOI Abstract
2018
Unravelling the aggregation induced emission enhancement in Tris(4,7-diphenyl-1,10-phenanthroline)ruthenium(II) complex
Babu E.
Vol. 98 , pp. 7-10
314 views DOI
2015
promoting collaboration and cultural competence for physician assistant and physical therapist students: a cross-cultural decentralized interprofessional education model
;Kathleen De Oliveira;Sara North;Barbra Beck;Jane Hopp
Vol. 12 , pp. -
314 views DOI Abstract
2015
associations of learning style with cultural values and demographics in nursing students in iran and malaysia
;Abdolghani Abdollahimohammad;Rogayah Ja’afar
Vol. 12 , pp. -
302 views DOI Abstract
2015
unmet needs in continuing medical education programs for rural chinese township health professionals
;Yanhua Yi;Virasakdi Chongsuvivatwong;Hutcha Sriplung;Guijie Hu;Edward McNeil;Qiming Feng;Hongxia Zhou;Bo Wei
Vol. 12 , pp. -
297 views DOI Abstract
View All 42 Articles
39
Overall
Poor
31
15
30
40
37
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

38.9/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.8/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

36.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.