kritika | Journament

Journal Ranking

#2824 / 33,958
📊 Below Average
Overall Score
40.3/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
30
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
36
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 2 weeks ago

kritika

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
Short Name kritika
Abbreviated Name kritika
ISSN
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (16 total)

2019
Russians, Romanians, or Neither? Mobilization of Ethnicity and "National Indifference" in Early 20th-Century Bessarabia
Cusco, A.
Vol. 20 , pp. 7-38
328 views DOI
2017
bone fracture healing in mechanobiological modeling: a review of principles and methods
;Mohammad S. Ghiasi;Jason Chen;Ashkan Vaziri;Edward K. Rodriguez;Ara Nazarian
Vol. 6 , No. C , pp. 87-100
299 views DOI Abstract
2017
measles virus nucleocapsid protein modulates the signal regulatory protein-β1 (sirpβ1) to enhance osteoclast differentiation in paget's disease of bone
;Kumaran Sundaram;Yuvaraj Sambandam;Srinivasan Shanmugarajan;D. Sudhaker Rao;Sakamuri V. Reddy
Vol. 7 , No. C , pp. 26-32
272 views DOI Abstract
2017
iliac crest histomorphometry and skeletal heterogeneity in men
;Xiaoyu Tong;Inari S Burton;Jukka S Jurvelin;Hanna Isaksson;Heikki Kröger
Vol. 6 , No. C , pp. 9-16
252 views DOI Abstract
2020
altered topological blueprint of trabecular bone associates with skeletal pathology in humans
;Natalie Reznikov;Ammar A. Alsheghri;Nicolas Piché;Mathieu Gendron;Catherine Desrosiers;Ievgeniia Morozova;Juan Manuel Sanchez Siles;David Gonzalez-Quevedo;Iskandar Tamimi;Jun Song;Faleh Tamimi
Vol. 12 , pp. 100264-
247 views Abstract
2016
short-term intermittent administration of parathyroid hormone facilitates osteogenesis by different mechanisms in cancellous and cortical bone
;Kenji Ogura;Tadahiro Iimura;Yuji Makino;Ayano Sugie-Oya;Aya Takakura;Ryoko Takao-Kawabata;Toshinori Ishizuya;Keiji Moriyama;Akira Yamaguchi
Vol. 5 , pp. 7-14
240 views Abstract
2017
sex hormones and quantitative ultrasound parameters at the heel in men and women from the general population
;Konrad Pätzug;Nele Friedrich;Hanna Kische;Anke Hannemann;Henry Völzke;Matthias Nauck;Brian G. Keevil;Robin Haring
Vol. 7 , No. C , pp. 51-56
239 views DOI Abstract
2017
low dose effect of bisphosphonates on hmscs osteogenic response to titanium surface in vitro
;N.R. Alqhtani;N.J. Logan;S. Meghji;R. Leeson;P.M. Brett
Vol. 6 , No. C , pp. 64-69
235 views DOI Abstract
2016
the f-actin modulator swap-70 controls podosome patterning in osteoclasts
;Anne Roscher;Tomoka Hasegawa;Sebastian Dohnke;Carlos Ocaña-Morgner;Norio Amizuka;Rolf Jessberger;Annette I. Garbe
Vol. 5 , pp. 214-221
206 views Abstract
2016
is bone equally responsive to calcium and vitamin d intake from food vs. supplements? use of 41calcium tracer kinetic model
;Tara S. Rogers;Marjorie G. Garrod;Janet M. Peerson;Darren J. Hillegonds;Bruce A. Buchholz;Elieke Demmer;Christine Richardson;Erik R. Gertz;Marta D. Van Loan
Vol. 5 , pp. 117-123
201 views Abstract
View All 16 Articles
40
Overall
Below Average
30
15
30
40
36
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

40.3/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.2/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

36.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.