Indexed in Journament

value in health : the journal of the international society for pharmacoeconomics and outcomes research

ISSN 1524-4733· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
42.1/100
Journament Score
#3,799
Journament Rank
26
Articles Indexed

About This Journal

Short Name value health
Abbreviated Name value health
ISSN 1524-4733
URL https://www.journals.elsevier.com/value-in-health

Indexings

ncbi

Tools & Certificate of Indexing

Certificate of Indexing
Quality Badge Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's verified indexing scores on your website with our self-contained widget.

One-Line JavaScript Embed:
Advantages: Single-line script, seamless DOM integration, clickable badges linking to full journal profile.
Standard iFrame Embed Code:
Widget Preview:

Publications Per Year

Articles (26)

2019
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis for Influenza Vaccination Coverage and Timing in Tropical and Subtropical Climate Settings: A Modeling Study.
Vol. 22 , No. 12 , pp. 1345-1354
436 views DOI Abstract
Principles of good practice for budget impact analysis: report of the ISPOR Task Force on good research practices--budget impact analysis.
Vol. 10 , No. 5 , pp. 336-47
419 views Abstract
2019
Implications of Nonmarginal Budgetary Impacts in Health Technology Assessment: A Conceptual Model.
Vol. 22 , No. 8 , pp. 891-897
412 views DOI Abstract
Budget impact analysis-principles of good practice: report of the ISPOR 2012 Budget Impact Analysis Good Practice II Task Force.
Vol. 17 , No. 1 , pp. 5-14
377 views DOI Abstract
2020
Costs and Benefits of Alternative Strategies to Control the Spread of Livestock-Acquired Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus From Pig Production.
Vol. 23 , No. 1 , pp. 89-95
373 views DOI Abstract
Good research practices for cost-effectiveness analysis alongside clinical trials: the ISPOR RCT-CEA Task Force report.
Vol. 8 , No. 5 , pp. 521-33
367 views Abstract
2019
United States Valuation of EQ-5D-5L Health States Using an International Protocol.
Vol. 22 , No. 8 , pp. 931-941
360 views DOI Abstract
Using real-world data for coverage and payment decisions: the ISPOR Real-World Data Task Force report.
Vol. 10 , No. 5 , pp. 326-35
357 views Abstract
2020
Costs and Benefits of Alternative Strategies to Control the Spread of Livestock-Acquired Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus From Pig Production.
Vol. 23 , No. 1 , pp. 89-95
373 views DOI Abstract
2020
Increasing the Legitimacy of Tough Choices in Healthcare Reimbursement: Approach and Results of a Citizen Forum in The Netherlands.
Vol. 23 , No. 1 , pp. 32-38
290 views DOI Abstract
2019
Multicriteria Decision Analysis to Support Health Technology Assessment Agencies: Benefits, Limitations, and the Way Forward.
Vol. 22 , No. 11 , pp. 1283-1288
306 views DOI Abstract
2019
Adjusting for Inflation and Currency Changes Within Health Economic Studies.
Vol. 22 , No. 9 , pp. 1026-1032
279 views DOI Abstract
2019
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis for Influenza Vaccination Coverage and Timing in Tropical and Subtropical Climate Settings: A Modeling Study.
Vol. 22 , No. 12 , pp. 1345-1354
436 views DOI Abstract
2019
A Scoping Review of Investment Cases for Vaccines and Immunization Programs.
Vol. 22 , No. 8 , pp. 942-952
335 views DOI Abstract
2019
Implications of Nonmarginal Budgetary Impacts in Health Technology Assessment: A Conceptual Model.
Vol. 22 , No. 8 , pp. 891-897
412 views DOI Abstract
2019
United States Valuation of EQ-5D-5L Health States Using an International Protocol.
Vol. 22 , No. 8 , pp. 931-941
360 views DOI Abstract
2017
theoretical study of the interaction between vanadium oxide and hy-zeolite elucidating loss activity of the catalyst
Vol. 6 , No. 2 , pp. 42-48
169 views DOI Abstract
2016
zinc-chromium oxide catalyst for gas-phase ketonisation of pentanoic acid
Vol. 6 , No. 2 , pp. 1-6
13 views DOI Abstract
42
Overall
Below Average
31
35
30
40
33
50
0
0
0
0
0

Overall Quality Score

42.1/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.8/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

32.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.