Indexed in Journament

value in health : the journal of the international society for pharmacoeconomics and outcomes research

ISSN 1524-4733· EN

Journal Website Certificate of Indexing
Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
33.2 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #18,373 of 29,341 scored journals (33,995 indexed)
26 Articles
Scores higher than 37.3% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name value health
Abbreviated Name value health
ISSN 1524-4733
URL https://www.journals.elsevier.com/value-in-health

Quality Profile

6 of 12 dimensions measured
Engagement 31.3
Accessibility 20.0
Timeliness 0.0
Innovation 60.0
Community Impact 10.0
Content Distribution 70.5
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

6 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left out entirely rather than plotted as zero, and with 6 dimensions measured there is not enough of a profile to draw as a shape.

Show the numbers
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 31.3 30.1
Accessibility 20.0 17.9
Timeliness 0.0 19.2
Diversity — 28.8
Innovation 60.0 31.2
Community Impact 10.0 13.4
Content Distribution 70.5 88.4
Content Quality — 55.5
Ethics & Transparency — 40.2
Editorial Standards — 33.4
Publication Regularity — 53.2
Geographic Reach — 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (26)

2019
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis for Influenza Vaccination Coverage and Timing in Tropical and Subtropical Climate Settings: A Modeling Study.
Yue, Mu;Dickens, Borame L;Yoong, Joanne Su-Yin;I-Cheng Chen, Mark;Teerawattananon, Yot;Cook, Alex R;
Vol. 22 , No. 12 , pp. 1345-1354
445 views DOI Abstract
Good research practices for comparative effectiveness research: defining, reporting and interpreting nonrandomized studies of treatment effects using secondary data sources: the ISPOR Good Research Practices for Retrospective Database Analysis Task Force Report--Part I.
Berger, Marc L;Mamdani, Muhammad;Atkins, David;Johnson, Michael L;
Vol. 12 , No. 8 , pp. 1044-52
432 views DOI Abstract
Principles of good practice for budget impact analysis: report of the ISPOR Task Force on good research practices--budget impact analysis.
Mauskopf, Josephine A;Sullivan, Sean D;Annemans, Lieven;Caro, Jaime;Mullins, C Daniel;Nuijten, Mark;Orlewska, Ewa;Watkins, John;Trueman, Paul;
Vol. 10 , No. 5 , pp. 336-47
427 views Abstract
2019
Implications of Nonmarginal Budgetary Impacts in Health Technology Assessment: A Conceptual Model.
Howdon, Daniel D H;Lomas, James R S;Paulden, Mike;
Vol. 22 , No. 8 , pp. 891-897
418 views DOI Abstract
Budget impact analysis-principles of good practice: report of the ISPOR 2012 Budget Impact Analysis Good Practice II Task Force.
Sullivan, Sean D;Mauskopf, Josephine A;Augustovski, Federico;Jaime Caro, J;Lee, Karen M;Minchin, Mark;Orlewska, Ewa;Penna, Pete;Rodriguez Barrios, Jose-Manuel;Shau, Wen-Yi;
Vol. 17 , No. 1 , pp. 5-14
388 views DOI Abstract
2014
Long-term air humidification therapy is cost-effective for patients with moderate or severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease or bronchiectasis.
Milne, Richard J;Hockey, Hans;Rea, Harry;
Vol. 17 , No. 4 , pp. 320-7
383 views DOI Abstract
Good research practices for cost-effectiveness analysis alongside clinical trials: the ISPOR RCT-CEA Task Force report.
Ramsey, Scott;Willke, Richard;Briggs, Andrew;Brown, Ruth;Buxton, Martin;Chawla, Anita;Cook, John;Glick, Henry;Liljas, Bengt;Petitti, Diana;Reed, Shelby;
Vol. 8 , No. 5 , pp. 521-33
382 views Abstract
2020
Costs and Benefits of Alternative Strategies to Control the Spread of Livestock-Acquired Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus From Pig Production.
Jensen, Jørgen Dejgaard;Christensen, Tove;Olsen, Jakob Vesterlund;Sandøe, Peter;
Vol. 23 , No. 1 , pp. 89-95
381 views DOI Abstract
2019
United States Valuation of EQ-5D-5L Health States Using an International Protocol.
Pickard, A Simon;Law, Ernest H;Jiang, Ruixuan;Pullenayegum, Eleanor;Shaw, James W;Xie, Feng;Oppe, Mark;Boye, Kristina S;Chapman, Richard H;Gong, Cynthia L;Balch, Alan;Busschbach, Jan J V;
Vol. 22 , No. 8 , pp. 931-941
367 views DOI Abstract
Using real-world data for coverage and payment decisions: the ISPOR Real-World Data Task Force report.
Garrison, Louis P;Neumann, Peter J;Erickson, Pennifer;Marshall, Deborah;Mullins, C Daniel;
Vol. 10 , No. 5 , pp. 326-35
367 views Abstract
2020
Costs and Benefits of Alternative Strategies to Control the Spread of Livestock-Acquired Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus From Pig Production.
Jensen, Jørgen Dejgaard;Christensen, Tove;Olsen, Jakob Vesterlund;Sandøe, Peter;
Vol. 23 , No. 1 , pp. 89-95
381 views DOI Abstract
2020
Increasing the Legitimacy of Tough Choices in Healthcare Reimbursement: Approach and Results of a Citizen Forum in The Netherlands.
Bijlmakers, Leon;Jansen, Maarten;Boer, Bert;van Dijk, Wieteke;Groenewoud, Stef;Zwaap, Jacqueline;Helderman, Jan-Kees;van Exel, Job;Baltussen, Rob;
Vol. 23 , No. 1 , pp. 32-38
308 views DOI Abstract
2019
Multicriteria Decision Analysis to Support Health Technology Assessment Agencies: Benefits, Limitations, and the Way Forward.
Baltussen, Rob;Marsh, Kevin;Thokala, Praveen;Diaby, Vakaramoko;Castro, Hector;Cleemput, Irina;Garau, Martina;Iskrov, Georgi;Olyaeemanesh, Alireza;Mirelman, Andrew;Mobinizadeh, Mohammedreza;Morton, Alec;Tringali, Michele;van Til, Janine;Valentim, Joice;Wagner, Monika;Youngkong, Sitaporn;Zah, Vladimir;Toll, Agnes;Jansen, Maarten;Bijlmakers, Leon;Oortwijn, Wija;Broekhuizen, Henk;
Vol. 22 , No. 11 , pp. 1283-1288
320 views DOI Abstract
2019
Adjusting for Inflation and Currency Changes Within Health Economic Studies.
Turner, Hugo C;Lauer, Jeremy A;Tran, Bach Xuan;Teerawattananon, Yot;Jit, Mark;
Vol. 22 , No. 9 , pp. 1026-1032
292 views DOI Abstract
2019
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis for Influenza Vaccination Coverage and Timing in Tropical and Subtropical Climate Settings: A Modeling Study.
Yue, Mu;Dickens, Borame L;Yoong, Joanne Su-Yin;I-Cheng Chen, Mark;Teerawattananon, Yot;Cook, Alex R;
Vol. 22 , No. 12 , pp. 1345-1354
445 views DOI Abstract
2019
A Scoping Review of Investment Cases for Vaccines and Immunization Programs.
Sim, So Yoon;Jit, Mark;Constenla, Dagna;Peters, David H;Hutubessy, Raymond C W;
Vol. 22 , No. 8 , pp. 942-952
342 views DOI Abstract
2019
Implications of Nonmarginal Budgetary Impacts in Health Technology Assessment: A Conceptual Model.
Howdon, Daniel D H;Lomas, James R S;Paulden, Mike;
Vol. 22 , No. 8 , pp. 891-897
418 views DOI Abstract
2019
United States Valuation of EQ-5D-5L Health States Using an International Protocol.
Pickard, A Simon;Law, Ernest H;Jiang, Ruixuan;Pullenayegum, Eleanor;Shaw, James W;Xie, Feng;Oppe, Mark;Boye, Kristina S;Chapman, Richard H;Gong, Cynthia L;Balch, Alan;Busschbach, Jan J V;
Vol. 22 , No. 8 , pp. 931-941
367 views DOI Abstract
2017
theoretical study of the interaction between vanadium oxide and hy-zeolite elucidating loss activity of the catalyst
;Irineo Pedro Zaragoza;Maricela Arroyo;Benjamín Vargas Arista
Vol. 6 , No. 2 , pp. 42-48
179 views DOI Abstract
2016
zinc-chromium oxide catalyst for gas-phase ketonisation of pentanoic acid
;Mohammed Al-ghamdi;Hossein Bayahia
Vol. 6 , No. 2 , pp. 1-6
23 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
33.2/100 · Poor
Ranked #18,373 of 29,341 scored
(33,995 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.
Journament

Overall Quality Score

33.2/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

31.3/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

60.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

10.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

70.5/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.