Implications of Nonmarginal Budgetary Impacts in Health Technology Assessment: A Conceptual Model.
Clicks: 420
ID: 13223
2019
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Steady Performance
80.2
/100
420 views
307 readers
Trending
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
SteadyRanked #4 of 26 articles by views in value in health : the journal of the international society for pharmacoeconomics and outcomes research
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
This paper introduces a framework with which to conceptualize the decision-making process in health technology assessment for new interventions with high budgetary impacts. In such circumstances, the use of a single threshold based on the marginal productivity of the healthcare system is inappropriate. The implications of this for potential partial implementation, horizontal equity, and pharmaceutical pricing are illustrated using this framework.Under the condition of perfect divisibility and given an objective of maximizing health, a large budgetary impact of a new treatment may imply that optimal implementation is partial rather than full, even at a given incremental cost-effectiveness ratio that would nevertheless mean the decision to accept the treatment in full would not lead to a net reduction in health. In a one-shot price-setting game, this seems to give rise to potential horizontal equity concerns. When the assumption of fixity of the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (arising from the assumed exogeneity of the manufacturer's price) is relaxed, it can be shown that the threat of partial implementation may be sufficient to give rise to an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio at which cost the entire potential population is treated, maximizing health at an increased level, and with no contravention of the horizontal equity principle.
| Reference Key |
howdon2019implicationsvalue
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Howdon, Daniel D H;Lomas, James R S;Paulden, Mike; |
| Journal | value in health : the journal of the international society for pharmacoeconomics and outcomes research |
| Year | 2019 |
| DOI |
S1098-3015(19)30191-3
|
| URL | |
| Keywords | Keywords not found |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.