Journal of dentistry | Journament

Journal Ranking

#3270 / 33,959
📉 Poor
Overall Score
39.8/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
33
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 2 weeks ago

Journal of dentistry

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus ncbi ulakbim sci
Short Name J Dent
Abbreviated Name j dent
ISSN 1879-176X
Aim and Scope
URL https://www.journals.elsevier.com/journal-of-dentistry
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (19 total)

2019
High fluoride dentifrice for preventing and arresting root caries in community-dwelling older adults: A randomized controlled clinical trial.
León, Soraya;González, Katherine;Hugo, Fernando N;Gambetta-Tessini, Karla;Giacaman, Rodrigo A;
Vol. 86 , pp. 110-117
379 views DOI Abstract
2019
Viscosity of chitosan impacts the efficacy of F/Sn containing toothpastes against erosive/abrasive wear in enamel.
Pini, Núbia Inocencya Pavesi;Lima, Débora Alves Nunes Leite;Luka, Benedikt;Ganss, Carolina;Schlueter, Nadine;
, pp. 103247
310 views DOI Abstract
2019
Effect of different polishing techniques for composite resin materials on surface properties and bacterial biofilm formation.
Kurt, Aysegul;Cilingir, Aylin;Bilmenoglu, Caglar;Topcuoglu, Nursen;Kulekci, Guven;
, pp. 103199
306 views DOI Abstract
2019
Microcavitated (ICDAS 3) carious lesion arrest with resin or glass ionomer sealants in first permanent molars: A randomized controlled trial.
Muñoz-Sandoval, Cecilia;Gambetta-Tessini, Karla;Giacaman, Rodrigo A;
303 views DOI Abstract
2019
Network meta-analysis on the effect of desensitizing toothpastes on dentine hypersensitivity
Hu, M.
Vol. 88 , pp. 0-0
295 views DOI
2019
Effects of different discoloration challenges and whitening treatments on dental hard tissues and composite resin restorations.
Zhao, Xiaoyi;Zanetti, Filippo;Wang, Lin;Pan, Jie;Majeed, Shoaib;Malmstrom, Hans;Peitsch, Manuel C;Hoeng, Julia;Ren, Yanfang;
, pp. 103182
291 views DOI Abstract
2020
Leadership in Dental Practice: a Three Stage Systematic Review and Narrative Synthesis.
Hanks, Sally;Cotton, Debby;Spowart, Lucy;
Vol. 102 , pp. 103480
265 views DOI Abstract
2016
comparative assessment of rice husk ash, powdered glass and cement as lateritic soil stabilizers
;Adebisi Ridwan;Taiwo Kanmodi;Olufikayo Aderinlewo
Vol. 2016 , No. 3 , pp. -
253 views DOI Abstract
2017
numerical simulation of ultrasonic detection for concrete structure based on equivalent offset migration
;Mingshun Hu;Juanjuan Li;Dongming Pan;Shenen Chen
Vol. 2017 , No. 4 , pp. 497-506
240 views DOI Abstract
2016
the effect of degradation processes on the serviceability of building materials of historic buildings
;Jiří Witzany;Tomáš Čejka;Klára Kroftová;Markéta Šmidtová
Vol. 2016 , No. 3 , pp. -
216 views DOI Abstract
View All 19 Articles
40
Overall
Poor
31
35
30
40
33
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

39.8/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.8/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

32.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.