Indexed in Journament

range management and agroforestry

EN

Certificate of Indexing
Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
32.2 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #18,226 of 29,339 scored journals (33,995 indexed)
19 Articles
Scores higher than 37.8% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name range management and agroforestry
Abbreviated Name range management and agroforestry

Quality Profile

5 of 12 dimensions measured
Engagement 30.5
Timeliness 0.0
Innovation 42.0
Community Impact 3.6
Content Distribution 75.4
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

7 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left out entirely rather than plotted as zero, and with 5 dimensions measured there is not enough of a profile to draw as a shape.

Show the numbers
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.5 30.2
Accessibility — 17.8
Timeliness 0.0 15.9
Diversity — 28.3
Innovation 42.0 30.1
Community Impact 3.6 11.5
Content Distribution 75.4 88.5
Content Quality — 55.5
Ethics & Transparency — 40.2
Editorial Standards — 33.4
Publication Regularity — 53.2
Geographic Reach — 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (19)

2017
kerja sama studi bidang lingkungan: potret indonesia di terbitan berkala ilmiah sciencedirect
;Himawanto Himawanto
Vol. 13 , No. 2 , pp. 142-154
327 views DOI Abstract
2017
Agroforestry and grassland mapping in two districts of Uttarakhand through geospatial technology
Rizvi, R.
Vol. 38 , pp. 254-258
315 views
2017
kolaborasi internal, domestik dan internasional serta korelasinya dengan sitasi yang diperoleh: analisis publikasi ugm di scopus
;Maryono Maryono;Surajiman Surajiman
Vol. 13 , No. 2 , pp. 166-177
278 views DOI Abstract
2017
evaluasi persiapan perpustakaan stikes 'aisyiyah yogyakarta dalam membangun perpustakaan digital
;Irkhamiyati Irkhamiyati
Vol. 13 , No. 1 , pp. 37-46
258 views DOI Abstract
2016
manajemen risiko sistem informasi perpustakaan (studi kasus di perpustakaan universitas gadjah mada)
;Arif Nurochman
Vol. 10 , No. 2 , pp. 1-13
250 views DOI Abstract
2016
pemanfaatan koleksi repository perpustakaan fakultas mipa ugm menggunakan eprints
;Wiyarsih Wiyarsih
Vol. 11 , No. 2 , pp. 50-61
240 views DOI Abstract
2015
Effects of selective tree species on phytosociology and production of understorey vegetation in mid-himalayan region of himachal pradesh
Gupta, B.
Vol. 36 , pp. 156-163
238 views
2016
persepsi pemustaka dari latar belakang sosial yang berbeda terhadap fungsi perpustakaan (studi di perpustakaan kota yogyakarta)
;Rizki Nurislaminingsih;Partini Partini
Vol. 12 , No. 2 , pp. 159-165
227 views DOI Abstract
2015
strategi pengelolaan unit penunjang universitas perpustakaan universitas gadjah mada 'yogyakarta (strategy of management of gadjah mada university libraries yogyakarta)
;Wahyu Supriyanto;Sunyoto Usman;I Gusti Ngurah Putra
Vol. 2 , No. 2 , pp. -
220 views DOI Abstract
2016
validasi data katalog perpustakaan puspar ugm
;Titik Supanti;Janu Saptari;Fernando Marpaung
Vol. 9 , No. 2 , pp. 32-43
213 views DOI Abstract
2017
kolaborasi internal, domestik dan internasional serta korelasinya dengan sitasi yang diperoleh: analisis publikasi ugm di scopus
;Maryono Maryono;Surajiman Surajiman
Vol. 13 , No. 2 , pp. 166-177
278 views DOI Abstract
2017
evaluasi persiapan perpustakaan stikes 'aisyiyah yogyakarta dalam membangun perpustakaan digital
;Irkhamiyati Irkhamiyati
Vol. 13 , No. 1 , pp. 37-46
258 views DOI Abstract
2017
kerja sama studi bidang lingkungan: potret indonesia di terbitan berkala ilmiah sciencedirect
;Himawanto Himawanto
Vol. 13 , No. 2 , pp. 142-154
327 views DOI Abstract
2017
Agroforestry and grassland mapping in two districts of Uttarakhand through geospatial technology
Rizvi, R.
Vol. 38 , pp. 254-258
315 views
2016
pengaruh soft skill staf perpustakaan terhadap pelayanan prima di perpustakaan fakultas ilmu sosial dan ilmu politik universitas gadjah mada yogyakarta
;Nur Rochmah
Vol. 12 , No. 2 , pp. 144-149
134 views DOI Abstract
2016
menumbuhkan perpustakaan komunitas : study kasus pada taman baca di tk melati ceria school surabaya dan taman baca di tk aisyiah 06 surabaya
;Dewi Puspitasari
Vol. 11 , No. 1 , pp. 9-16
194 views DOI Abstract
2016
persepsi pemustaka dari latar belakang sosial yang berbeda terhadap fungsi perpustakaan (studi di perpustakaan kota yogyakarta)
;Rizki Nurislaminingsih;Partini Partini
Vol. 12 , No. 2 , pp. 159-165
227 views DOI Abstract
2016
pengaruh ketersediaan koleksi buku fiksi terhadap minat kunjung siswa di perpustakaan smk muhammadiyah gamping yogyakarta
;Bayu Widya Hastoro;Sri Rumani
Vol. 12 , No. 1 , pp. 16-24
104 views DOI Abstract
2016
profil literasi informasi pustakawan indonesia
;Arief Wicaksono
Vol. 12 , No. 1 , pp. 1-9
207 views DOI Abstract
2016
keterlibatan penulis dalam artikel pada ”buletin psikologi” universitas gadjah mada
;Pergola Irianti
Vol. 11 , No. 1 , pp. 17-24
203 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
32.2/100 · Poor
Ranked #18,226 of 29,339 scored
(33,995 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.
Journament

Overall Quality Score

32.2/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.5/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

42.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

3.6/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

75.4/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.