acta neuropathologica | Journament

Journal Ranking

#4452 / 33,959
📉 Poor
Overall Score
38.3/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
30
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
34
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 2 weeks ago

acta neuropathologica

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus ncbi ulakbim sci
Short Name acta neuropathol
Abbreviated Name acta neuropathol
ISSN 1432-0533
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (438 total)

1970
Permeability of blood vessels and connective tissue sheaths in retina and optic nerve
Yngve Olsson;Krister Kristensson;Yngve Olsson;Krister Kristensson;
Vol. 26 , No. 2 , pp. 147-156
698 views DOI Abstract
2016
Neuroinflammation impairs adaptive structural plasticity of dendritic spines in a preclinical model of Alzheimer’s disease
Chengyu Zou;Yuan Shi;Jasmin Ohli;Ulrich Schüller;Mario M. Dorostkar;Jochen Herms;Chengyu Zou;Yuan Shi;Jasmin Ohli;Ulrich Schüller;Mario M. Dorostkar;Jochen Herms;
Vol. 131 , No. 2 , pp. 235-246
477 views DOI Abstract
1970
Neuron-associated class III β-tubulin isotype, retinal S-antigen, synaptophysin, and glial fibrillary acidic protein in human medulloblastomas: a clinicopathological analysis of 36 cases
T. Maraziotis;E. Perentes;E. Karamitopoulou;Y. Nakagawa;E. C. Gessaga;A. Probst;A. Frankfurter;T. Maraziotis;E. Perentes;E. Karamitopoulou;Y. Nakagawa;E. C. Gessaga;A. Probst;A. Frankfurter;
Vol. 84 , No. 4 , pp. 355-363
381 views DOI Abstract
2019
An update on the CNS manifestations of neurofibromatosis type 2.
Coy, Shannon;Rashid, Rumana;Stemmer-Rachamimov, Anat;Santagata, Sandro;
344 views DOI Abstract
1970
Quantitative immunohistochemical analysis of the distribution of neurofibrillary tangles and senile plaques in the cerebral cortex of nonagenarians and centenarians
P. Giannakopoulos;P. R. Hof;M. Surini;J. P. Michel;C. Bouras;P. Giannakopoulos;P. R. Hof;M. Surini;J. P. Michel;C. Bouras;
Vol. 85 , No. 6 , pp. 602-610
342 views DOI Abstract
1970
Expression of intercellular adhesion molecule (ICAM)-1 by a subset of astrocytes in Alzheimer disease and some other degenerative neurological disorders
Haruhiko Akiyama;Toshio Kawamata;Tatsuo Yamada;Ikuo Tooyama;Tsyoshi Ishii;Patrick L. McGeer;Haruhiko Akiyama;Toshio Kawamata;Tatsuo Yamada;Ikuo Tooyama;Tsyoshi Ishii;Patrick L. McGeer;
Vol. 85 , No. 6 , pp. 628-634
337 views DOI Abstract
2016
Traumatic thrombosis of intracranial arteries and extensive necrosis of the brain developed during reanimation
G. Th. A. M. Bots;W. Kramer;G. Th. A. M. Bots;W. Kramer;
Vol. 3 , No. 5 , pp. 416-427
331 views DOI Abstract
2011
Claudin-1 induced sealing of blood–brain barrier tight junctions ameliorates chronic experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis
Friederike Pfeiffer;Julia Schäfer;Ruth Lyck;Victoria Makrides;Sarah Brunner;Nicole Schaeren-Wiemers;Urban Deutsch;Britta Engelhardt;Friederike Pfeiffer;Julia Schäfer;Ruth Lyck;Victoria Makrides;Sarah Brunner;Nicole Schaeren-Wiemers;Urban Deutsch;Britta Engelhardt;
Vol. 122 , No. 5 , pp. 601-614
316 views DOI Abstract
2014
Neurofibromin specific antibody differentiates malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors (MPNST) from other spindle cell neoplasms
David E. Reuss;Antje Habel;Christian Hagenlocher;Jana Mucha;Ulrike Ackermann;Claudia Tessmer;Jochen Meyer;David Capper;Gerhard Moldenhauer;Victor Mautner;Pierre-Olivier Frappart;Jens Schittenhelm;Christian Hartmann;Christian Hagel;Kathrin Katenkamp;Iver Petersen;Gunhild Mechtersheimer;Andreas von Deimling;David E. Reuss;Antje Habel;Christian Hagenlocher;Jana Mucha;Ulrike Ackermann;Claudia Tessmer;Jochen Meyer;David Capper;Gerhard Moldenhauer;Victor Mautner;Pierre-Olivier Frappart;Jens Schittenhelm;Christian Hartmann;Christian Hagel;Kathrin Katenkamp;Iver Petersen;Gunhild Mechtersheimer;Andreas von Deimling;
Vol. 127 , No. 4 , pp. 565-572
307 views DOI Abstract
1970
Communicating hydrocephalus in rodents treated with β , β ′-iminodipropionitrile (IDPN)
M. G. Fiori;L. R. Sharer;Herbert E. Lowndes;M. G. Fiori;L. R. Sharer;Herbert E. Lowndes;
Vol. 65 , No. 3 , pp. 209-216
306 views DOI Abstract
View All 438 Articles
38
Overall
Poor
30
15
30
40
34
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

38.3/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.5/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

33.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.