Indexed in Journament

International journal of offender therapy and comparative criminology

ISSN 1552-6933· EN

Journal Website Certificate of Indexing
Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
40.6 / 100
Journament Score
Below Average
Ranked #7,387 of 29,341 scored journals (33,995 indexed)
43 Articles
Scores higher than 74.8% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol
Abbreviated Name int j offender ther comp criminol
ISSN 1552-6933
URL http://ijo.sagepub.com

Quality Profile

7 of 12 dimensions measured
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

5 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left as gaps in the shape rather than plotted as zero.

Show the numbers
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.6 30.1
Accessibility 20.0 17.9
Timeliness 20.0 19.2
Diversity 55.6 28.8
Innovation 70.0 31.2
Community Impact 10.0 13.4
Content Distribution 69.8 88.4
Content Quality — 55.5
Ethics & Transparency — 40.2
Editorial Standards — 33.4
Publication Regularity — 53.2
Geographic Reach — 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (43)

2008
state of the art about remote laboratories paradigms - foundations of ongoing mutations
;Christophe Gravier;Jacques Fayolle;Bernard Bayard;Mikael Ates;Jeremy Lardon
Vol. 4 , No. 1 , pp. 19-25
383 views Abstract
2019
Pains of Imprisonment Beyond Prison Walls: Qualitative Research With Females Labelled as Not Criminally Responsible.
Mertens, Anouk;Vander Laenen, Freya;
, pp. 306624X19875579
380 views DOI Abstract
2018
Exploring the Impact of an AVRS Curfew Program on Recidivism of Juvenile Probationers in Korea.
Cho, Younoh;Mellow, Jeff;
Vol. 62 , No. 14 , pp. 4425-4444
367 views DOI Abstract
2011
characteristics and educational advantages of laboratory automation in high school chemistry
;Leonid B. Revzin;Igor M. Verner
Vol. 7 , No. S1 , pp. 44-49
365 views DOI Abstract
2018
An Exploratory Analysis of Violent Offending and the Acquired Capability for Suicide in Male Prisoners.
Mandracchia, Jon;Sylvara, Ashley;Wikowsky, Addie;Tieman, Kristen;Smith, Phillip;
Vol. 62 , No. 11 , pp. 3436-3446
357 views DOI Abstract
2008
soa meets robots - a service-based software infrastructure for remote laboratories
;Frank Feinbube;Robert Wierschke;Andreas Rasche;Peter Tröger
Vol. 4 , No. 2 , pp. 24-30
353 views DOI Abstract
2019
The Spatial Effect of Police Foot Patrol on Crime Patterns: A Local Analysis.
Andresen, Martin A;Shen, Jen-Li;
Vol. 63 , No. 8 , pp. 1446-1464
351 views DOI Abstract
2020
Implicit Theories of Child Sexual Exploitation Material Offenders: Cross-Cultural Validation of Interview Findings.
Soldino, Virginia;Merdian, Hannah L;Bartels, Ross M;Bradshaw, Hannah K;
Vol. 64 , No. 4 , pp. 315-334
350 views DOI Abstract
2009
design and verification of application specific integrated circuits in a network of online labs
;A.Y. Al-Zoubi;Michael E. Auer;Danilo Garbi Zutin
Vol. 5 , No. 3 , pp. 25-29
349 views DOI Abstract
2003
An exploration of childhood victimization and family-of-origin characteristics of sexual offenders against children.
Stirpe, Tania S;Stermac, Lana E;
Vol. 47 , No. 5 , pp. 542-55
347 views Abstract
2023
Experiences of Sentencing and the Pains of Punishment: Prisoners' Perspectives.
Atkins, Deirdre;Maguire, Niamh;Cleere, Geraldine;
, pp. 306624X221148127
127 views DOI Abstract
2020
Examining Recidivism in a Prostitution Diversion Program
Koegler, E.
Vol. 64 , pp. 232-248
196 views DOI
2020
Implicit Theories of Child Sexual Exploitation Material Offenders: Cross-Cultural Validation of Interview Findings.
Soldino, Virginia;Merdian, Hannah L;Bartels, Ross M;Bradshaw, Hannah K;
Vol. 64 , No. 4 , pp. 315-334
350 views DOI Abstract
2020
Supervising Employees With Criminal History: An Exploratory Study of Manager Strategies and Perceptions.
Friese, Bettina;Ochoa, Araceli;Garcia, Enedelia;Hildebrandt, Josee;Holmes, Carly;
, pp. 306624X20904699
321 views DOI Abstract
2019
The Spatial Effect of Police Foot Patrol on Crime Patterns: A Local Analysis.
Andresen, Martin A;Shen, Jen-Li;
Vol. 63 , No. 8 , pp. 1446-1464
351 views DOI Abstract
2019
Stressful Life Events and Negative Emotions on Delinquency Among Korean Youth: An Empirical Test of General Strain Theory Assessing Longitudinal Mediation Analysis.
Cho, Sujung;Galehan, Jordan;
, pp. 306624X19873079
326 views DOI Abstract
2019
Pains of Imprisonment Beyond Prison Walls: Qualitative Research With Females Labelled as Not Criminally Responsible.
Mertens, Anouk;Vander Laenen, Freya;
, pp. 306624X19875579
380 views DOI Abstract
2019
Palestinian Women in Terrorism: A Double-Edged Sword?
Erez, Edna;Laster, Kathy;
, pp. 306624X19862429
211 views DOI Abstract
2018
a quasi-experimental design to evaluate the use of pythontutor on programming laboratory session
;Oscar Karnalim;Mewati Ayub
Vol. 14 , No. 02 , pp. 155-164
221 views DOI Abstract
2018
security optimization of wireless sensor networks based on cloud platform
;Rong Shi;Wang Xi
Vol. 14 , No. 02 , pp. 48-59
99 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
40.6/100 · Below Average
Ranked #7,387 of 29,341 scored
(33,995 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.
Journament

Overall Quality Score

40.6/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.6/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

55.6/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

10.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

20.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

69.8/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.