Indexed in Journament

current diabetes reviews

ISSN 1875-6417· EN

Journal Website Certificate of Indexing
Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
33.9 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #10,627 of 29,297 scored journals (34,027 indexed)
58 Articles
Scores higher than 63.7% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name curr diabetes rev
Abbreviated Name curr diabetes rev
ISSN 1875-6417
URL http://www.eurekaselect.com/587/journal/current-diabetes-reviews

Quality Profile

7 of 12 dimensions measured
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

5 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left as gaps in the shape rather than plotted as zero.

Show the numbers
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 31.0 30.5
Accessibility 20.0 23.0
Timeliness 0.0 3.0
Diversity 50.0 25.9
Innovation 70.0 24.1
Community Impact 10.0 5.7
Content Distribution 47.9 89.4
Content Quality — 55.1
Ethics & Transparency — 40.5
Editorial Standards — 33.0
Publication Regularity — 52.9
Geographic Reach — 30.4

Publications Per Year

Articles (58)

2019
Clinical Predictors of Diabetic Retinopathy Progression; A Systematic Review.
Ghamdi, Abdul Hamid Al;
423 views DOI Abstract
2017
Nutrition Transition and Obesity Among Teenagers and Young Adults in South Asia.
Jayawardena, Ranil;Ranasinghe, Priyanga;Wijayabandara, Maheshi;Hills, Andrew P;Misra, Anoop;
Vol. 13 , No. 5 , pp. 444-451
407 views DOI Abstract
2009
grund- und menschenrechtsschutz durch deutsches bundesverfassungsgericht, kroatischen verfassungsgerichtshof, europäischen gerichtshof für menschenrechte und europäischen gerichtshof
;Marcus Heintzen
Vol. 46 , No. 3 , pp. 493-506
403 views Abstract
2020
Factors influencing adherence among youth with Type-1-Diabetes Mellitus - the Hungarian case.
Nagy, Beáta Erika;Munkácsi, Brigitta;Kovács, Karolina Eszter;
402 views DOI Abstract
2019
Nutritional Interventions and Considerations for the development of low calorie or sugar free foods.
Singh, Jyoti;Rasane, Prasad;Kaur, Sawinder;Kumar, Vikas;Dhawan, Kajal;Mahato, Dipendra K;Malhotra, Sunita;Sarma, Chayanika;Kaur, Damanpreet;Bhattacharya, Jayatee;
359 views DOI Abstract
2016
reflections on the current problems of oversight of administration
;Jacques Caillosse
Vol. 53 , No. 1 , pp. 43-55
337 views Abstract
2015
law and literature movement and the aim of narrative jurisprudence
;Mia Bašić
Vol. 52 , No. 2 , pp. 311-333
337 views Abstract
2012
social and cultural implications multiculturalism / implications sociales et culturelles du multiculturalisme, (ur. matas g. & kostadinov b.), filozofski fakultet u splitu i hrvatsko-kanadsko akademsko društvo, zagreb, 2011. migration, globalization, hibridity: canadian and croatian experiences / migration, globalisation, hybridite: experiences canadiennes et croates (ur. matas g. & kostadinov b.), filozofski fakultet u splitu i hrvatsko-kanadsko akademsko društvo, zagreb, 2011.
;Petar Bačić
Vol. 49 , No. 1 , pp. 223-225
331 views
2013
effect of european legal rules governing the legalization of administrative law proceeding in croatia
;Dario Đerđa
Vol. 50 , No. 2 , pp. 393-427
295 views Abstract
2017
out-of-court dispute resolution in french administrative law
;Daniel Chabanol
Vol. 54 , No. 1 , pp. 13-22
292 views Abstract
2020
Factors influencing adherence among youth with Type-1-Diabetes Mellitus - the Hungarian case.
Nagy, Beáta Erika;Munkácsi, Brigitta;Kovács, Karolina Eszter;
402 views DOI Abstract
2019
Clinical Predictors of Diabetic Retinopathy Progression; A Systematic Review.
Ghamdi, Abdul Hamid Al;
423 views DOI Abstract
2019
Nutritional Interventions and Considerations for the development of low calorie or sugar free foods.
Singh, Jyoti;Rasane, Prasad;Kaur, Sawinder;Kumar, Vikas;Dhawan, Kajal;Mahato, Dipendra K;Malhotra, Sunita;Sarma, Chayanika;Kaur, Damanpreet;Bhattacharya, Jayatee;
359 views DOI Abstract
2018
the marija Šarapova case (related to the croatian legal framework on damages liability)
;Blanka Kačer
Vol. 55 , No. 2 , pp. 369-384
236 views Abstract
2018
institute of exemption of officials in the general administrative procedure act
;Ivan Šprajc
Vol. 55 , No. 2 , pp. 469-496
127 views Abstract
2018
james r. may and erin daly global environmental constitutionalism, cambridge university press 2015., p. 414
;Mia Bašić
Vol. 55 , No. 1 , pp. 273-274
135 views
2018
justin collings democracy guardians: a history of the german federal constitutional court 1951-2001, oxford university press 2015., p. 331
;Vedran Zlatić
Vol. 55 , No. 2 , pp. 525-526
170 views
2017
out-of-court dispute resolution in french administrative law
;Daniel Chabanol
Vol. 54 , No. 1 , pp. 13-22
292 views Abstract
2017
Nutrition Transition and Obesity Among Teenagers and Young Adults in South Asia.
Jayawardena, Ranil;Ranasinghe, Priyanga;Wijayabandara, Maheshi;Hills, Andrew P;Misra, Anoop;
Vol. 13 , No. 5 , pp. 444-451
407 views DOI Abstract
2016
the rights and obligations of administrative courts - the problems in practice
;Bosiljka Britvić Vetma;Vlaho Bassegli Gozze
Vol. 53 , No. 1 , pp. 207-232
246 views Abstract
Journament Score
33.9/100 · Poor
Ranked #10,627 of 29,297 scored
(34,027 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.
Journament

Overall Quality Score

33.9/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

31.0/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

50.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

10.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

47.9/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.