Indexed in Journament

Frontiers in endocrinology

ISSN 1664-2392· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
39.1/100
Journament Score
#10,509
Journament Rank
89
Articles Indexed

About This Journal

Short Name Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)
Abbreviated Name front endocrinol (lausanne)
ISSN 1664-2392
URL http://www.frontiersin.org/endocrinology

Indexings

scopus ncbi doaj ulakbim sci

Tools & Certificate of Indexing

Certificate of Indexing
Quality Badge Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's verified indexing scores on your website with our self-contained widget.

One-Line JavaScript Embed:
Advantages: Single-line script, seamless DOM integration, clickable badges linking to full journal profile.
Standard iFrame Embed Code:
Widget Preview:

Publications Per Year

Articles (89)

2017
Out-of-Reference Range Thyroid-Stimulating Hormone Levels in Levothyroxine-Treated Primary Hypothyroid Patients: A Multicenter Observational Study
Vol. 8 , pp. -
668 views Abstract
2019
Glycosylation Pattern and Bioactivity of Reference Follitropin alfa and Biosimilars.
Vol. 10 , pp. 503
588 views DOI Abstract
2018
Exposure to Perchlorate in Lactating Women and Its Associations With Newborn Thyroid Stimulating Hormone
Vol. 9 , pp. -
448 views Abstract
2019
Validation of ART Calculator for Predicting the Number of Metaphase II Oocytes Required for Obtaining at Least One Euploid Blastocyst for Transfer in Couples Undergoing Fertilization/Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection.
Vol. 10 , pp. 917
442 views DOI Abstract
2019
Prevalence of Metabolic Syndrome and Its Determinants in Newly-Diagnosed Adult-Onset Diabetes in China: A Multi-Center, Cross-Sectional Survey.
Vol. 10 , pp. 661
440 views DOI Abstract
2019
Pesticides With Potential Thyroid Hormone-Disrupting Effects: A Review of Recent Data.
Vol. 10 , pp. 743
422 views DOI Abstract
2013
Changes In Men’s Salivary Testosterone And Cortisol Levels, And In Sexual Desire After Smelling Female Axillary And Vulvar Scents
Vol. 4 , pp. -
406 views Abstract
2019
Populations Collapses in Marine Invertebrates Due to Endocrine Disruption: A Cause for Concern?
Vol. 10 , pp. 721
390 views DOI Abstract
2015
3D Porous Architecture of Stacks of β-TCP Granules Compared with That of Trabecular Bone: A microCT, Vector Analysis, and Compression Study.
Vol. 6 , pp. 161
382 views DOI Abstract
2019
Identification of a New Theca/Interstitial Cell-Specific Gene and Its Biological Role in Growth of Mouse Ovarian Follicles at the Gonadotropin-Independent Stage.
Vol. 10 , pp. 553
368 views DOI Abstract
2024
Schizophrenia and type 2 diabetes risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Vol. 15 , pp. 1395771
107 views DOI Abstract
2022
Frequency of variants and parental mosaicism in families with inactivating PTH/PTHrP signaling disorder type 2.
Vol. 13 , pp. 1055431
190 views DOI Abstract
2019
Clinical Relevance of Genetic Analysis in Patients With Pituitary Adenomas: A Systematic Review.
Vol. 10 , pp. 837
317 views DOI Abstract
2019
Validation of ART Calculator for Predicting the Number of Metaphase II Oocytes Required for Obtaining at Least One Euploid Blastocyst for Transfer in Couples Undergoing Fertilization/Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection.
Vol. 10 , pp. 917
442 views DOI Abstract
2019
Aging and Imaging Assessment of Body Composition: From Fat to Facts.
Vol. 10 , pp. 861
327 views DOI Abstract
2019
Maternal Photoperiodic Programming: Melatonin and Seasonal Synchronization Before Birth.
Vol. 10 , pp. 901
339 views DOI Abstract
2019
Pesticides With Potential Thyroid Hormone-Disrupting Effects: A Review of Recent Data.
Vol. 10 , pp. 743
422 views DOI Abstract
2019
Identification of a New Theca/Interstitial Cell-Specific Gene and Its Biological Role in Growth of Mouse Ovarian Follicles at the Gonadotropin-Independent Stage.
Vol. 10 , pp. 553
368 views DOI Abstract
39
Overall
Poor
31
35
30
40
34
50
0
0
0
0
0

Overall Quality Score

39.1/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.6/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

34.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.