metabolic syndrome and related disorders | Journament

Journal Ranking

#5449 / 33,980
📉 Poor
Overall Score
39.9/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
35
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 1 month ago

metabolic syndrome and related disorders

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Certificate of Indexing
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
ncbi ulakbim
Short Name metab syndr relat disord
Abbreviated Name metab syndr relat disord
ISSN 1557-8518
Aim and Scope
URL https://www.liebertpub.com/loi/met
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (17 total)

2019
Relationship Between Metabolic Syndrome and Beta-Cell Function in Nondiabetic Korean Premenopausal and Postmenopausal Women: 2015 Korean National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey.
Yoon, Hyun;Lee, Jun Ho;Gi, Mi Young;Cha, Ju Ae;Moon, Ae Eun;Seong, Jeong Min;
347 views DOI Abstract
2019
Insulin Resistance Among Pregnant Women in Urban Areas of Arusha Region, Tanzania.
Msollo, Safiness Simon;Martin, Haikael David;Mwanri, Akwilina Wendelin;Petrucka, Pammla;
339 views DOI Abstract
2016
avaliação dos fatores de risco maternos em gestantes admitidas com pré-eclâmpsia grave<br>doi: 10.20513/2447-6595.2016v56n2p25-29
;Nilce Ariane Spencer Santos;Julio Augusto Alves Gurgel;Carla Gurgel Camurça
Vol. 56 , No. 2 , pp. 25-29
310 views DOI Abstract
2012
Effect of a low-fat versus a low-gycemic-load diet on inflammatory biomarker and adipokine concentrations.
Heggen, Eli;Klemsdal, Tor Ole;Haugen, Fred;Holme, Ingar;Tonstad, Serena;
Vol. 10 , No. 6 , pp. 437-42
282 views DOI Abstract
2016
tratamento de grave hemorragia digestiva baixa sem uso de sangue em paciente dependente de hemodiálise: relato de caso<br>doi: 10.20513/2447-6595.2016v56n2p51-53
;Walberto Monteiro Neiva Eulálio Filho;Helder de Melo Sérvio
Vol. 56 , No. 2 , pp. 51-53
278 views DOI Abstract
2015
potencial efeito benéfico da suplementação de colecalciferol na prevenção do diabetes mellitus tipo 1
;Rafaella Gonçalves Ferreira de Oliveira;Renan Magalhães Montenegro Júnior
Vol. 55 , No. 1 , pp. -
252 views DOI Abstract
2018
consequências à criança do uso de drogas durante a gestação: um artigo de revisão
;Raquel da Silveira Kataoka de Paula
Vol. 58 , No. 1 , pp. 45-52
222 views DOI Abstract
2015
convulsão febril: aspectos clínicos e terapêuticos. artigo de revisão
;Sarah Pinheiro de Alencar
Vol. 55 , No. 1 , pp. 38-42
177 views DOI Abstract
2017
perspectivas e principais alterações no dsm-5
;Janaína Bandeira;Eugênio de Moura Campos
Vol. 57 , No. 1 , pp. 15-18
171 views DOI Abstract
2017
reação hansênica reversa associada à síndrome de reconstituição imune
;Karla Linhares Pinto;José Wilson Accioly Filho;Márcia Gonçalves Brasil;Thatiana Catunda Torres Mota;Amanda Maria Menezes Dantas;Alinne Mota Cavalcante;Orisa Santos de Brito
Vol. 57 , No. 2 , pp. 61-64
154 views DOI Abstract
View All 17 Articles
40
Overall
Poor
31
35
30
40
35
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

39.9/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.7/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

34.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.