تحقیقات سلامت در جامعه | Journament

Journal Ranking

#1810 / 33,953
📉 Poor
Overall Score
39.8/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
30
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
34
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 4 days ago

تحقیقات سلامت در جامعه

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
Short Name تحقیقات سلامت در جامعه
Abbreviated Name تحقیقات سلامت در جامعه
ISSN
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (12 total)

2016
Evaluation of Removal and Adsorption Isotherms of Zinc and Copper from Municipal Solid Waste Leachate Using Clinoptilolite Adsorbent
toolabi, ali;allahabadi, ahmad;miri, mohammad;sani, hamidreza karimi;
Vol. 2 , No. 1 , pp. 37-45
349 views Abstract
2017
salt tolerance in rice: focus on mechanisms and approaches
;Inja Naga Bheema Lingeswara Reddy;Beom-Ki Kim;In-Sun Yoon;Kyung-Hwan Kim;Taek-Ryoun Kwon
Vol. 24 , No. 3 , pp. 123-144
344 views DOI Abstract
2016
Evaluation of waste management, manufacturing industries, from an environmental standpoint (Case Study: Savojbolagh city Alborz Province)
nikzad, mashaalah;farzadkia, mehdi;Gholami, Mitra;
Vol. 2 , No. 1 , pp. 1-11
333 views Abstract
2018
estimation of rice evapotranspiration using reflective images of landsat satellite in sefidrood irrigation and drainage network
;Maryam Taherparvar;Nader Pirmoradian
Vol. 25 , No. 2 , pp. 111-116
290 views DOI Abstract
2016
antixenosis and tolerance of rice genotypes against brown planthopper
;Preetinder Singh Sarao;Jagadaish Sanmallappa Bentur
Vol. 23 , No. 2 , pp. 96-103
275 views DOI Abstract
2017
identification of rice accessions associated with k+/na+ ratio and salt tolerance based on physiological and molecular responses
;Inja Naga Bheema Lingeswara Reddy;Sung-Mi Kim;Beom-Ki Kim;In-Sun Yoon;Taek-Ryoun Kwon
Vol. 24 , No. 6 , pp. 360-364
265 views DOI Abstract
2017
assessment of snp and indel variations among rice lines of tulaipanji x ranjit
;Subhas Chandra Roy;Vijaya Bhasker Reddy Lachagari
Vol. 24 , No. 6 , pp. 336-348
259 views DOI Abstract
2017
test of small rna sequencing repeatability in rice
;Sun Hong-zheng;Peng Ting;Zhang Jing;Li Jun-zhou;Du Yan-xiu;Zhao Quan-zhi
Vol. 24 , No. 1 , pp. 56-60
250 views DOI Abstract
2016
assessing silicon availability in soils of rice-growing lowlands and neighboring uplands in benin and nigeria
;S.S. Abe;Y. Yamasaki;T. Wakatsuki
Vol. 23 , No. 4 , pp. 196-202
243 views DOI Abstract
2018
diversity of dsrna viruses infecting rice sheath blight fungus rhizoctonia solani ag-1 ia
;Zheng Li;Liu Chen;Zhang Meiling;Yang Mei;Zhou Erxun
Vol. 25 , No. 1 , pp. 57-60
240 views DOI Abstract
View All 12 Articles
40
Overall
Poor
30
15
30
40
34
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

39.8/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.4/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

33.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.