Indexed in Journament

jbi database of systematic reviews and implementation reports

ISSN 2202-4433· EN

Journal Website Certificate of Indexing
Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
32.6 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #15,369 of 29,324 scored journals (34,008 indexed)
36 Articles
Scores higher than 47.5% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name jbi database system rev implement rep
Abbreviated Name jbi database system rev implement rep
ISSN 2202-4433
URL http://www.joannabriggslibrary.org/jbilibrary/index.php/jbisrir/issue/archive

Quality Profile

7 of 12 dimensions measured
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

5 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left as gaps in the shape rather than plotted as zero.

Show the numbers
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.9 30.4
Accessibility 20.0 19.1
Timeliness 0.0 9.2
Diversity 51.9 25.8
Innovation 52.5 27.4
Community Impact 15.7 7.8
Content Distribution 49.0 88.6
Content Quality — 55.5
Ethics & Transparency — 40.2
Editorial Standards — 33.4
Publication Regularity — 53.2
Geographic Reach — 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (36)

2019
Lived experiences of adults with borderline personality disorder: a systematic review protocol.
McDonagh, Teresa;Higgins, Agnes;Archer, Jenny;Galavan, Eoin;Sheaf, Greg;Doyle, Louise;
557 views DOI Abstract
2015
The effectiveness of using non-traditional teaching methods to prepare student health care professionals for the delivery of mental state examination: a systematic review.
Xie, Huiting;Liu, Lei;Wang, Jia;Joon, Kum Eng;Parasuram, Rajni;Gunasekaran, Jamuna;Poh, Chee Lien;
Vol. 13 , No. 7 , pp. 177-212
487 views DOI Abstract
2019
Preventative interventions, protocols or guidelines for trauma patients at risk of cervical collar related pressure ulcers: a scoping review.
Lacey, Lanise;Palokas, Michelle;Walker, Jean;
471 views DOI Abstract
2019
Experiences and perceptions of spousal/partner caregivers providing care for community-dwelling adults with dementia: a qualitative systematic review.
Macdonald, Marilyn;Martin-Misener, Ruth;Weeks, Lori;Helwig, Melissa;Moody, Elaine;MacLean, Heather;
461 views DOI Abstract
2019
Impact of clinical supervision of health professionals on organizational outcomes: a mixed methods systematic review protocol.
Martin, Priya;Lizarondo, Lucylynn;Kumar, Saravana;Snowdon, David;
430 views DOI Abstract
2019
Use of huddles among frontline staff in clinical settings: a scoping review protocol.
Pimentel, Camilla B;Hartmann, Christine W;Okyere, Daniel;Carnes, Sarah L;Loup, Julia R;Vallejo-Luces, Tatiana M;Sloup, Sharon N;Snow, A Lynn;
403 views DOI Abstract
2020
Impact of mobile health interventions during the perinatal period on maternal psychosocial outcomes: a systematic review.
Dol, Justine;Richardson, Brianna;Murphy, Gail Tomblin;Aston, Megan;McMillan, Douglas;Campbell-Yeo, Marsha;
Vol. 18 , No. 1 , pp. 30-55
381 views DOI Abstract
2017
Living with symptoms of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder in adulthood: a systematic review of qualitative evidence.
Bjerrum, Merete B;Pedersen, Preben U;Larsen, Palle;
Vol. 15 , No. 4 , pp. 1080-1153
378 views DOI Abstract
2019
The impact of parent-targeted eHealth educational interventions on infant procedural pain management: A systematic review protocol
Richardson, B.
Vol. 17 , pp. 1589-1599
376 views DOI
2015
The patient experience of patient-centered communication with nurses in the hospital setting: a qualitative systematic review protocol.
Newell, Stephanie;Jordan, Zoe;
Vol. 13 , No. 1 , pp. 76-87
355 views DOI Abstract
2020
Impact of mobile health interventions during the perinatal period on maternal psychosocial outcomes: a systematic review.
Dol, Justine;Richardson, Brianna;Murphy, Gail Tomblin;Aston, Megan;McMillan, Douglas;Campbell-Yeo, Marsha;
Vol. 18 , No. 1 , pp. 30-55
381 views DOI Abstract
2020
Enhancing the verbal handover process for nurses in inpatient orthopedic wards: a best practice implementation project.
Tan, Apphia Jia Qi;Rashasegaran, Ahtherai;Goh, Mien Li;
Vol. 18 , No. 1 , pp. 200-211
212 views DOI Abstract
2020
Reducing contamination of midstream urine samples through standardized collection processes: a best practice implementation project.
Liaw, Yi Qi;Goh, Mien Li;
Vol. 18 , No. 1 , pp. 256-271
145 views DOI Abstract
2019
Men's perspectives on HIV self-testing in sub-Saharan Africa: a qualitative systematic review protocol.
Hlongwa, Mbuzeleni;Hlongwana, Khumbulani;
241 views DOI Abstract
2019
Lived experiences of adults with borderline personality disorder: a systematic review protocol.
McDonagh, Teresa;Higgins, Agnes;Archer, Jenny;Galavan, Eoin;Sheaf, Greg;Doyle, Louise;
557 views DOI Abstract
2019
Information needs and information seeking behaviors of patients and families in acute healthcare settings: A scoping review
Kynoch, K.
Vol. 17 , pp. 1130-1153
274 views DOI
2019
Disaster management in rural and remote primary healthcare settings: a scoping review protocol.
Willson, Katie;Lim, David;
211 views DOI Abstract
2019
Experiences and perceptions of spousal/partner caregivers providing care for community-dwelling adults with dementia: a qualitative systematic review.
Macdonald, Marilyn;Martin-Misener, Ruth;Weeks, Lori;Helwig, Melissa;Moody, Elaine;MacLean, Heather;
461 views DOI Abstract
2019
Use of huddles among frontline staff in clinical settings: a scoping review protocol.
Pimentel, Camilla B;Hartmann, Christine W;Okyere, Daniel;Carnes, Sarah L;Loup, Julia R;Vallejo-Luces, Tatiana M;Sloup, Sharon N;Snow, A Lynn;
403 views DOI Abstract
2019
Experiences of compassion fatigue in direct care nurses: a qualitative systematic review
Salmond, E.
Vol. 17 , pp. 682-753
234 views DOI
Journament Score
32.6/100 · Poor
Ranked #15,369 of 29,324 scored
(34,008 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.
Journament

Overall Quality Score

32.6/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.9/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

51.9/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

52.5/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

15.7/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

49.0/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.